FYI you can do this yourself with a save editor (I used
You must be registered to see the links
), just grab your save from appdata/LocalLow folder.Really good game, hope to see more of this!
Really good game, hope to see more of this!
Cheats for 0.0.5;
F8 for XP and 1000 Gold
F9 for corruption cleansing
F10 for +50 points to every stat
I tried and it worked but I am not giving any promises for bugs it may cause.
You must be registered to see the links
F8 for XP and 1000 Gold
F9 for corruption cleansing
F10 for +50 points to every stat
I tried and it worked but I am not giving any promises for bugs it may cause.
The new area is to the north of the first swamp area. Just go north of the merchant and keep moving to the north. You can find one of the new enemies there and the new boss is hidden near/in(?) one of the big trees.
Maybe we should consider using MelonLoader to allow easier mods for this game, mods that wouldn't necessarily need to be updated with each patch.
Never make a suggestion again
Holy hell this game has potential.
Being able to aim with the mouse makes fighting way easier. If people don't want to download tools or modify the save data, you can also close and open the game if you get caught without being able to struggle out. Game auto-saves on level transitions and when you get a status effect, so doing so right after being caught resets the encounter.
Being able to aim with the mouse makes fighting way easier. If people don't want to download tools or modify the save data, you can also close and open the game if you get caught without being able to struggle out. Game auto-saves on level transitions and when you get a status effect, so doing so right after being caught resets the encounter.
Go slurp your slop somewhere else.
And since you surely feel so superior trying to shoot down people calling you out, here's a more detailed critique from someone who actually tried using some AI art generation for personal purposes as well as works with AI in my place of employment:
On the personal preference side - AI art is uninspired and in 99.9% of cases ends up all looking more or less the same across every use of it. Sure, one woman is going to be a brunette another a blonde, but they all look the same. Skin, eyes, expression - it all ends up looking fake and plastic-y. The quality is also questionable, with a lot of art out there having major graphical or anatomical mistakes (or needing an excessive amount of re-prompting to fix them nullifying any time/effort saving). Not only that, but photorealism is pretty much the only thing AI can do decently if at all, and that is not the be all and end all of graphic design. There are hundreds if not thousands of examples across visual media showing that good art direction and stylization can be a thousand times more effective and pleasant to engage with than 4k HD ultra-realistic ray-traced images.
But more fundamentally, on the ethics side: the tools you mention have been licensed, and the people contributing to them were either compensated or decided to make them available for free by their own choice. AI models on the other hand, are swallowing training data from everywhere with no questions asked, no credits, no compensation and no oversight or way to protect or take back data that is found to be stolen. When you're using an asset pack, someone chose to make it available for you to use. When you're using AI generation, there are dozens if not hundreds of artists who either didn't want or don't even know that their work was used to train it. It's no different than just finding pictures you like online and using them, AI just gives you the legal ambiguity for people whose work was stolen to not be able to tell you to stop or call you out on it. Legal ambiguity, by the way, that is exploited by millionaires and corporations directly benefiting from having their services used in place of artists that they used to provide it.
And before you say that plenty of other things in our lives is built on the backbone of unethical or "icky" practices - I absolutely agree. But contrary to popular belief, it is absolutely valid to call this shit out regardless if you're engaging with some other "injustice". Sure, I'm not 100% that the smartphone I have doesn't have some material or component made in a sweatshop somewhere, but you won't catch me dead or dying using an apple product and I steer clear from companies that are known for violating ethics or human rights when possible. At the same time, those things have already happened and changing them is hard - especially for an individual: I'll happily engage with some call for change, but it's honestly delusional to think that me not buying the product that millions of people do changes anything. AI on the other hand is still evolving, as is the legal and ethical environment around it. So the widespread boycott of AI art is more likely to have an appreciable effect on how companies create or use AI tools as well as what legislation is going to eventually be put in place regarding it.
Also according to the save file, there's dog and midget (lol) semen, so possibly those'll be the next enemies
You don't even need that. The saves are held in plain old text and can be modified with any editor that supports proper json formatting like notepad++
Ignore them; all they know about AI is image generation. And it's when these experts start making games that we end up with disgusting AI slop.
Maybe next update we could get feral stuff like wolves or dogs? i love the knotting scenes and i think it should be great to see here
XZIZ
New Member
- Jan 7, 2023
- 11
- 62
- 116
I'm all for Ai to help developers and coders make art for their games or mods, or an artist to make code, "IF" the coder or developer doesn't do Art or doesn't have an artist to help, same idea for the artist, like some mod makers, they know how to code, but they don't do art.
In diogaoo's case, he doesn't need Ai for Art, because he IS Art, and I think Ai art would ruin this game's style.
In diogaoo's case, he doesn't need Ai for Art, because he IS Art, and I think Ai art would ruin this game's style.
GreenPotato
Newbie
- Oct 2, 2018
- 27
- 32
- 224
Well, I think "game over" screen is fine for this game, because as I understand, the developer is trying to make a "roguelike" with inheritable stat points through saves.
That's very good and a logical idea for a game like this. If the developer will not remove the "game over" screen, then I hope to see a mechanic where you need to save your previous heroine from the "monster nest" to stop more monster production. That would be in theme.
Thronico
Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 170
- 632
- 301
Am I shit, or is the timing for the basic attack combo fucking brutal as all hell?
Edit: You gotta reduce the stat penalties for the pregnancy system, mate. You can't do anything but wait lmao
Edit edit: What is up with the Spider's attack? I get that the solution is to run away until they get tired, but the actual grapple is frustrating as all hell, not to mention the time punishment if you get like 10 eggs laid
Got a game over due to the restore potion being insanely undertuned. Game has a fantastic foundation and art, but needs rebindable controls, better scaling, and better itemization, otherwise it'll be more frustrating than arousing to play in the long-run.
Edit: You gotta reduce the stat penalties for the pregnancy system, mate. You can't do anything but wait lmao
Edit edit: What is up with the Spider's attack? I get that the solution is to run away until they get tired, but the actual grapple is frustrating as all hell, not to mention the time punishment if you get like 10 eggs laid
Got a game over due to the restore potion being insanely undertuned. Game has a fantastic foundation and art, but needs rebindable controls, better scaling, and better itemization, otherwise it'll be more frustrating than arousing to play in the long-run.
Last edited:
Combo is basically unusable until you get the perk that eliminates the timing req IMO. The timing is waaay to finnicy.