- Apr 27, 2017
- 7,737
- 8,323
Honestly, everyone should just look at it as "Well that person posts a lot..." and then give it no more thought."well-known member" is a very subjective term here. I don't think many here understand the Double entendre possible.
Just because you have a certain amount of comments and reactions is like giving participation trophies to every team.
As I'm sure most of us know, the ratio of comments to reactions is the standard to go by, not in all cases, but in most.
Forum titles relating to post count have always been arbitrary things that are pretty meaningless.
So, take big loads of money/influence/favours and review according to how big the backhand is/was?We don't need or want critics of their own personal uninformed opinion of someone else's hard work.
Google how to be a movie critic
Gotta say, that's a pretty elitist stance to take... Which is usually the stance the majority of people ignore immediately as being too biased to believe, much like many movie critics. Especially when the most prevelant of mainstream critics have been coming off as nothing more than mouth-pieces and shills for studios/agendas for a long, long time.