- May 11, 2020
- 10,543
- 15,975
Snugglepuff sorry Im not native englishspeaker sometimes i get it wrong or express me wrong please have patience with me
No worries man, that's why I added the explanation of "argument".Snugglepuff sorry Im not native englishspeaker sometimes i get it wrong or express me wrong please have patience with me
The only one who "labelled" you, was you. Your own actions showed your label for all to see.as you mentioned there are many games here and I don't have to waste mine here with you or anyone trying to label me
the opinion of others about me does not interest me because no one here really knows anyoneNo worries man, that's why I added the explanation of "argument".
Even many native English speakers don't understand how their own language works!
The only one who "labelled" you, was you. Your own actions showed your label for all to see.
Even many native English speakers don't understand how their own language works!
It does interest you though. You do care what others think of you, because you attempted to admonish me for highlighting your selfishness, and then made a point of continuing to imply that I'm beneath your notice... As you continue to endeavour to appear "above it all" even now.the opinion of others about me does not interest me because no one here really knows anyone
I'm not having a good day and so that I don't lose my temper and say something that causes me to be warned, I'm going to stop here, have a good timeIt does interest you though. You do care what others think of you, because you attempted to admonish me for highlighting your selfishness, and then made a point of continuing to imply that I'm beneath your notice... As you continue to endeavour to appear "above it all" even now.
Here's a free tip.
If you imply you're not going to waste your time on this thread any more, then actually follow through on that instead of behaving like a toddler having a tantrum.
You failed to understand what I said. I'll reword it.That's literally the definition of on topic.
No, that discussion wouldn't be off topic, according to what I argue the topic of the thread is. That conversation would be on topic, in that it arose out of a discussion of the game, relates to the development of the game, and could have ramifications for the future content of the game.That's not a "discussion" though. That's making comments about it.
If it turns into an actual discussion - talking about Patreon/PayPal censorship - then it's off topic.
I mind it in any case. I don't like it when rules are poorly defined and then arbitrarily enforced.I wouldn't mind so much if when it happened, they exercised their discression and authority in a responsible manner.
I understood you the first time. I just didn't agree with you. I still don't agree with you.I explained what I said, and when/why something is off topic... I've done it again above. Maybe you'll get the idea a second time with different wording.
I would argue that my interpretation of what subjects are on topic in this thread is more nuanced and expansive than yours, while yours is more simple and restrictive. If so, then it would be incorrect for you to call my argument an oversimplification. If so, then your opinion of my opinion would be mistaken.An opinion based on a convenient over-simplification of what you believe constitutes being on topic... Which is a mistaken opinion.
You are correct. I got from Zorlun (cannot remember if in pubilic post or PM, but I think was a public post), that Patreon did not forbid only "married", the "step something" was also forbidden, at least for Zorlun - it does not means someone else may be able/lucky to get through with it, but that, is a different matter.I could be wrong but I thought in the patreon friendly version, Anthony and Myriam never actually married and only lived together - as patreon doesn't differentiate between step-moms and moms when it comes to ic content. Both are forbidden.
Nope. In the original story, both kids where the kids of Anthony and Myriam, who were married.I think both kids were always from previous relationships on both sides, I don't think the back story was changed in that sense, as someone else said, Patreon don't see the difference between real incest and perceived incest (between step relations).
Nope.Before Patreon stuck their nose in, I'm fairly certain that Myriam and Anthony were married and they both brought children in to the marriage, so we knew from the start that Katherine was Myriam's daughter and Marc was Anthony's son.
I and the incest crew thank you very much for your work, without it many would have given upYou are correct. I got from Zorlun (cannot remember if in pubilic post or PM, but I think was a public post), that Patreon did not forbid only "married", the "step something" was also forbidden, at least for Zorlun - it does not means someone else may be able/lucky to get through with it, but that, is a different matter.
About the incest patch update, tomorrow.
I would have played it, regardless, but I definitely prefer it with incest.I and the incest crew thank you very much for your work, without it many would have given up
ofc I did and that dont answer for shit yo my past tense question as I had both working together last time I playedHasn't been incest in the base game or Prometheus Patch version for quite some time.
If you bothered to actually look at the OP though...
View attachment 2317204
The WT and Incest patch have never worked together, they both modify the same files. The gallery mod and incest work together though. Maybe you thought they did, but once you apply one, then copy over the next it replaces the same files.Last time I played there was walkthrough and incest so that not option right now? Kinda unplayable after getting used to it
Please notice, the walkthrough mod and this patch are not compatible, because both modify the code
It answers your question precisely, and you didn't have both mods working together.ofc I did and that dont answer for shit yo my past tense question as I had both working together last time I played