- Apr 19, 2019
- 60
- 83
I agree with you whole-heartedly. I think of it in the same vein as fictional murder, that is to say if fictional/virtual murder doesn't promote and/or cause actual murder, then fiction/virtual underaged sex doesn't promote and/or cause underaged sex.It's basically literature. So it's just fiction, fantasy, not real.
Lawmakers may disagree. Cloudflare and other providers may disagree. Therein lies the problem. It doesn't matter how we feel. There is potential that this stuff gets F95 in trouble and possibly shut down. The powers that be aren't really interested in discussing the finer points of morality.
The issue is really with visual depictions of underaged sex. Purely written sexual content involving fictional minors, in the US at least, is perfectly legal. You can go on Amazon right now and buy a copy of "Lolita". If you buy a loli doujin manga, however, now you're in a weird gray area. Some US states ban it alltogether and possession can get you in trouble. Other states are okay with it as long as it doesn't run afoul of obscenity laws, which require such works to have "artistic value". Artistic value is a difficult thing to define, so whether you're in trouble for possession of "obscene content" involving minors is often at the personal whim of some judge, if you're unlucky enough to end up in front of one.
Last edited: