- Mar 10, 2018
- 170
- 444
why the fuck was my theory of Nat potentially being autistic deleted i was talking about the game, reason given "take it somwhere else" where the fuck else am i supposed to take it
I see both Jasmine and Alexa as insanely smart girls who are both fun, playful, and mischievous but I don't think I'd call either of them immature. They tease the MC in a playful way, but I don't think either of them have really shown any emotional immaturity or lack of respect for Jake.Good choices. I like Allie and Maggie too. But they are kinda boring for me. I like fun girls like Jasmine.
Btw... why do you think Jasmine needs 5 more years to be wifey material? She's not mature enough for you?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I see both Jasmine and Alexa as insanely smart girls who are both fun, playful, and mischievous but I don't think I'd call either of them immature. They tease the MC in a playful way, but I don't think either of them have really shown any emotional immaturity or lack of respect for Jake.
What I would consider immature is a girl who slides the "girlfriend" talk into conversation even after her FWB (of 2~3 months) has said he's not ready for a relationship yet... and then gets so upset by when he doesn't take her to the Ball that she fucks off to Canada. I think that would be pretty immature.
Yeah I really don't get why that post was deleted because you made some interesting points about your interpretation of the character. How is that theory off topic while the spy theory is fine to be discussed?why the fuck was my theory of Nat potentially being autistic deleted i was talking about the game, reason given "take it somwhere else" where the fuck else am i supposed to take it
why the fuck was my theory of Nat potentially being autistic deleted i was talking about the game, reason given "take it somwhere else" where the fuck else am i supposed to take it
For once I'll risk the mods wrath on this. It's bullshit and not at all off-topic. The mod in question didn't even have the damn balls to let us know who it was who nuked the thread, choosing to delete everything anonymously so you can't message them to question their decision. Pathetic.Yeah I really don't get why that post was deleted because you made some interesting points about your interpretation of the character. How is that theory off topic while the spy theory is fine to be discussed?
don't really know, however i can understand the other stuff being deleted, however my theory being deleted makes no sense, thought we where allowed to discuss character interpretations? you get more mad theories in the BIK topic which don't get deleted, so why here? even now people are still talking about the theory of nat being a spy, why are they not being told to "take it eslewhere?Yeah I really don't get why that post was deleted because you made some interesting points about your interpretation of the character. How is that theory off topic while the spy theory is fine to be discussed?
yeah i don't give a shit if i get banned, why the fuck was my theory singled out?For once I'll risk the mods wrath on this. It's bullshit and not at all off-topic. The mod in question didn't even have the damn balls to let us know who it was who nuked the thread, choosing to delete everything anonymously so you can't message them to question their decision. Pathetic.
This site gets worse at times, utterly draconian and dictatorial at times depending on the mods whims who seemingly can act with impunity and without question.
V only does that if you take the girl that intentionally antagonizes her... for the other two she's upset but understanding.What I would consider immature is a girl who slides the "girlfriend" talk into conversation even after her FWB (of 2~3 months) has said he's not ready for a relationship yet... and then gets so upset when he doesn't take her to the Ball that she fucks off to Canada. I think that would be pretty immature.
yeah its bullshit.They also edited the message I replied to you.
View attachment 3830817
It was a pretty good theory, though.
She's bad at it, because it's her first time in the field. Plus she also wants the D badly.yeah its bullshit.
thank you I think its more interesting then her being a spy, she pretty bad at it, if she is a spy.
The annoying thing there/here is, there is really no actual evidence at all to support this theory that is going around like wildfire. So yours was as good as any imo to explain how she acts (and far more logical for that matter).yeah its bullshit.
thank you I think its more interesting then her being a spy, she pretty bad at it, if she is a spy.
she's pretty bad at it
She's simultaneously the worst spy you've ever seen, who leaves absolutely no trace of being one.there is really no actual evidence at all
nah shes autistic, you would be able to read my theory but some idiotic mod deleted the postShe's simultaneously the worst spy you've ever seen, who leaves absolutely no trace of being one.
Way to lend credibility to the theory.
The best friend's wife could be the reason Nat knows so much about the mc. Nat wasn't spying for the research the wife was telling her about him because she could be trying to set the two of them up. The reason the information slips is because the wife doesn't want him to know that she was trying to set the two up. (Or she was telling Nat about him to help complete her degree/they are in the same field of science.) I also mix up who tells me things at times so I can see Nat doing that too.The annoying thing there/here is, there is really no actual evidence at all to support this theory that is going around like wildfire. So yours was as good as any imo to explain how she acts (and far more logical for that matter).
What, you mean the "subverting expectations" that Hollywood is trying to push yet fail spectacularly? In the process alienating fans?If this were a Hollywood script or a novel and the writer was trying to tell an engaging story and keep the audience interested to the final page/screen, 99% chance the spy/bad guy is Jasmine. No way it's the obvious Nat or possibilities like Maggie or Alexa. It's the one you're not expecting.
Are these Devs creating mystery and suspense?
Or are they just putting the story out there?
maybe get some money?No money for the gauges what now?
How is it possible? Even if you lose the race before, you get enough money to buy gauges.No money for the gauges what now? It seems to lock you up if you don't have the cash
Someone's hacked your bank account. (Probably Alexa ).