- Aug 6, 2017
- 5,827
- 6,290
well they still got 2 weeks, and bunch of wallpaperswhere's the Abandoned tag?
You must be registered to see the links
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
well they still got 2 weeks, and bunch of wallpaperswhere's the Abandoned tag?
where's the Abandoned tag?
It takes a period of 18 months between content released for Abandonedwell they still got 2 weeks, and bunch of wallpapers View attachment 2391181
You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 2391180
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
yep so far they are updating at least once a month, with wallpapers if nothing else, so wont happen any time soon.It takes a period of 18 months between content released for Abandoned
Alternately it takes 3 months between communication.
So that post dated January means it CANNOT be abandoned until April 25th if they say nothing more until then
And it will probably only have 400 renders (including animations)well they still got 2 weeks, and bunch of wallpapers View attachment 2391181
You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 2391180
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
i guess we will have to see, as long as it will beAnd it will probably only have 400 renders (including animations)
well they still got 2 weeks, and bunch of wallpapers View attachment 2391181
You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 2391180
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
yeah i wouldnt mind for those games that takes for ever to have special tag, at least would be easier to recognize when go thru list, tho this one last update took 14 month to come and rest were round average 7View attachment 2391364
I still have in mind these rules! so a game without an update for more than 6 months needs a such tag! maybe not the "abandoned" tag indeed but at least a tag that says it's on hold for x reason! it's in Pending for x reasons! or
on standby...
Apparently you forget that means Dev update not contentView attachment 2391364
I still have in mind these rules! so a game without an update for more than 6 months needs a such tag! maybe not the "abandoned" tag indeed but at least a tag that says it's on hold for x reason! it's in Pending for x reasons! or
on standby...
The f*ck do you care if the game has the abandoned tag or not?View attachment 2391364
I still have in mind these rules! so a game without an update for more than 6 months needs a such tag! maybe not the "abandoned" tag indeed but at least a tag that says it's on hold for x reason! it's in Pending for x reasons! or
on standby...
saying that the game is in development is not enough and is not precise.The f*ck do you care if the game has the abandoned tag or not?
I mean devs have said that the game is in development and that the update will be out in 5-6 months. Why put a "on hold" or "abandoned" tag when apparently the game is in development? that would only bring confusion
saying that the game is in development is not enough and is not precise.
Either the releases are provided consistently or they are not!
claiming that the game is still in development and making 1 release per year is not accurate.
Therefore it's correct, in my view, to have such tags that will allow providing details on the frequency of the release! a kind of release scale! it exists and it's used a lot in the world of game development.
Actually, 1 content release per year is still technically "in development". It's just not fast enough. And therein lies the key advantage of consumers in the capitalist markets: don't buy it. Dropping financial support for those kinds of 'ruses' sends a louder message than complaining on development forums does. Taking money away from the service provider is the most powerful right you can exercise.saying that the game is in development is not enough and is not precise.
Either the releases are provided consistently or they are not!
claiming that the game is still in development and making 1 release per year is not accurate.
Therefore it's correct, in my view, to have such tags that will allow providing details on the frequency of the release! a kind of release scale! it exists and it's used a lot in the world of game development.
There are no 'Roberts Rules of Orders' here, just general guidelines that F95 and its moderators adhere to. Perhaps you should seek a different forum to vent your frustrations that Radiant's status is not accurately described to your satisfaction.saying that the game is in development is not enough and is not precise.
Either the releases are provided consistently or they are not!
claiming that the game is still in development and making 1 release per year is not accurate.
Therefore it's correct, in my view, to have such tags that will allow providing details on the frequency of the release! a kind of release scale! it exists and it's used a lot in the world of game development.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAjust general guidelines that F95 and its moderators adhere to.
Well, at least according to the image they used for their progress report that the only character I am interested in might finally get some content... So yipee for me, lol.well they still got 2 weeks, and bunch of wallpapers View attachment 2391181
You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 2391180
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.