- Jun 10, 2017
- 10,391
- 15,305
A team leader don't need to be a dedicated person. At work I'm team manager, but it's my role, not my job. My job is senior programmer. And in top of that I double as a guy who manage a team, because my boss trust me, or perhaps because I'm grumpy enough to make them go straight. They are all grown men perfectly capable, but sometime someone have to say stop, or to correct the direction they are taking.Only that there are teams large and small and not every project needs a dedicated person for the task.
But well, as you said, you aren't without leadership, so it solve this issue.
There's no shame in the fact to be amateur. To limit to my field of expertise, I know some who produce better code than me.I would also be carefull not to call small time dev's amateurs. Some take pride in their independence.
But anyway it's not the devs that were amateur in my sentence, but the studio ; and it was amateur by opposition to professional. Most teams on the scene are amateurs, not because they do average job, but because they lack of professionalism (no versioning system, for some we know that they also had no backup, no real lead, no unitary tests, and so on). It's amateur but, as I said, this doesn't mean that they can't do better than professional.