If you feel entitled to whine about the game's developer having a different opinion than yours then TheByQ is entitled to whine about you having a different opinion than him. Or you can both just scroll past the content you don't like.
There's a difference between having a different opinion and calling a game garbage just because it doesn't cater specifically to your fetishes.
If I saw a game called "town bicycle simulator" with tags "lots of sex", "dick in vagina", "gangbangs and creampies for 7 weeks straight", "kilometers of cock in pussy" people would call me stupid if I started whining that it's too much sex and the game is garbage because it plays the exact same as every other game with similar name and tags.
So why is it so common to do the opposite and go to a thread of a game with a title clearly implying exhibitionism, and with the "exhibitionism" tag, and complain that, as unbelievable as it sounds, the game is about exhibitionism, and not about being the city's free sex toy?
When I'm looking for a game about exhibitionism and see a game not about exhibitionism I just... move on, instead of, idk, complaining that a trainer game plays like every other trainer game, and then I finally find a game that actually shows proper exhibitionism, and not just "sex in public except it barely even counts as public because the only difference between it and sex in a private bedroom is a still image background", there's tons of people whining and moaning that they aren't the target audience of the game not targeted at them.
Which is annoying because it's already incredibly difficult to find a good game with actual proper exhibitionism, because a majority of the games tagged as such only have maybe one or two scenes in one route in which you have sex in the aforementioned barely-public spot and the "exhibitionism" part is not even a secondary theme but a mere coincidence. And people go to these very rare games and demand they be exactly like the vast majority of games