I mean...yeah, time travel is obviously more unbelievable than incest. But if you play a game about time travel, you have to extend your suspension of disbelief accordingly or playing the game would make no sense. But you would still want the characters to act and behave somewhat believable even if the premise of the whole story is by default unrealistic and/or unbelievable.
When Tiffany and Valerie talk about how Tiff was saved by a guy looking exactly like MC, they both reference that something else happened and Tiffany doesn't want to elaborate more than that, and by how they react to it, I think it implied that it was how Tiffany thanked her savior *very* gratefullyPart 2 includes the party - and Tiffany will be there.
I'm hoping that some sexy time in the past (a grateful Tiffany wants to show the MC that she appreciates what he did for her, perhaps even egged on by Scarlett) will trigger memories in the present, paving the way for 2019 Tiffany to pursue the MC/be more open in her desires to have sexy time with him.
We have to see how these encounters work - are there ripples from past encounters that carry into the present?
I'm hopeful!
Cheers!!
so lewd content with Tiffany is in MC's future, but in Tiffany's past xD whether the content is very extensive or not might be linked to a choice to be on hher path or not, but it's 100% sure that something did happen.
Good lord! If Scarlett's top was any tighter not only would her tits pop out happy to breathe some air, they'd be registered as WMDs 
All the women lusting after the MC, some (possibly all) to the point of being willing to share him as long as they get a turn, isn't exactly believable, if we're talking realism and not story logic.
My point was exactly: "How much would incest bother you and infringe on your suspension of disbelief."
That's never going to happen because the game is on Patreon..
Seems unlikely to be where the dev gonna go with the story, he can't anyway because of patreon and as you just stated it's not something that can be addressed with a patch. Especially since the baby makings and pregnancies would be player involved with choice made in game not just backstories stuff. There is also other thing that won't work if he go that way anyway, the twins with Scarlett are a good example, they are 18 but we go 20 years back in the past in which she won't get pregnant with them in more than over a year, the game will never go for as long as a in game year.
It's impressive that you can think those two thoughts consecutively without giving yourself whiplash.
It's a game about time travel, I'm not certain you understand how to think 4th dimensionally.
We know now 100% that it is possible to travel to different points in time, the other Darci proves that not only can you go back to more than just X number of years in the past but that at least two versions of you can be there at the same time. That alone nukes a lot of people's old theories.
Not necessarily. If Darci-A went back to 1999 and then stayed there, she could age twenty years and then go back and save Darci-B and the Main Character. Don't think that's what happened, but it's possible.
Not really, because this time with the Mc was the first time Darci went back in time. Another version of her couldn't have gone back before the version of her with Mc if it is fixed to X-number of years in a parallel sense. So, to travel back to before herself and wait would also mean that she was traveling back to different point in time just as much as if she had found a way to travel relatively free though time. The two Darcis means that time travel is more fluid than the early time travel moments made it seem in at least some way. The fixed 20 years or so that everyone had previously been assuming must be false, though the true way it works is still unknown. However it plays out though, the door is open to all manner of time travel shenanigans.
I'll stop now.
Okay, so going along with a scenario I don't really believe in... It is the first time Darci went back in time, but that wouldn't mean that the other Darci would have had to travel back further. If Darci originally went back in time on the same mission but there wasn't an older Darci to rescue them, it could have had a different result. Like, say, the Main Character dying. Darci is still able to save her mom, but the only way to save the MC is by hunkering down and waiting. She goes back in time for the second time right before the Darci we know goes back her first time (the boom we heard before the MC used the time machine) and waits for the moment to intervene. No breaking the 20 year rule.
I suppose something like that is possible, the only thing would be that I don't think sword-Darci looks 20 years older than current Darci, but it is possible I suppose. Though the idea of loop variants would be a whole new can of worms.
You had time traveling Darci before that. Remember the shit-ninja. That was totally Darci throwing shit on Shelby.
