FacelessVixen

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2017
1,368
5,372
yet still bunch of twitter losers crying bcs she is to sexy.
I like to think that more reasonable people of the terminally online population have moved to bluesky, so getting their general consensus seems more viable. Even before Muskrat, Twitter for at least the past 16 years has been that group of special needs kids that scared me out of playing Yu-Gi-Oh! or mentioning anything nerdy in high school.

But then again, we peaked with MySpace. Tom just wanted to be everyone's friend and for us to have a good time, and the goth and emo girls were hot and in the same age range as I was.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 

armond

Well-Known Member
Apr 26, 2020
1,861
6,467
I like to think that more reasonable people of the terminally online population have moved to bluesky, so getting their general consensus seems more viable. Even before Muskrat, Twitter for at least the past 16 years has been that group of special needs kids that scared me out of playing Yu-Gi-Oh! or mentioning anything nerdy in high school.

But then again, we peaked with MySpace. Tom just wanted to be everyone's friend and for us to have a good time, and the goth and emo girls were hot and in the same age range as I was.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: leathermax

JacksHoff

Member
Jul 15, 2018
351
398
I think it's highly unethical to use AI to produce so-called art in general and especially with the aim to plagiarize an artist (although I hardly label Oni as such when I look at what he does today). Just my opinion.
why is it unethical for art but no programing or loading trucks? the robot can't do anything unless we command it to so even it's art is by a man. on top of that there's enough complaints from 1 decade alone of his at that he isn't changing[doreen] that ai especialy for an individual can change. 2022_03_02_19_31_22_Batman_Beyond_S02E07_Once_Burned_VLC_media_player.jpg
 

Lulu66638

Member
Jul 5, 2017
163
388
why is it unethical for art but no programing or loading trucks? the robot can't do anything unless we command it to so even it's art is by a man.
1) Because of how the AI were fed: with art collected on the internet without its creators knowing it and even less approving it. There is a name for that kind of thing: theft, hence me calling AI use for artistic purpose unethical since it's built upon mass-thievery of authentic artists.

2) You said it yourself, AI doesn't really deserve the "intelligence" in its name: the user is the one doing the thinking. But using your imagination to come up with an original idea is but the first step into making art: after that, you have to realize your concept. This implies mastering the tools of the trade, whatever art you're doing; with an AI, you skip this part by literally automating the executive process. The moment you stop actually involving yourself in the realization of your idea and get an automaton on it, you go from art to product*, hence me calling pics generated by AI so-called art.

*: to make it clear, I'm not a Luddite. I simply don't call whatever is mass-produced in factories (at our command too... ) art - and I don't think anyone does. There is a reason why handmade things are more valued...
 
Last edited:

asha32

New Member
Nov 7, 2019
5
2
this game used to make my Xiaomi incredibly hot and laggy (version 0.9xxx something) and now years later I gave it a shot (v1.6) on my M1 air and game started slowing down an hour or so in and I was confused for a bit and then realized it was also incredibly hot to the touch
never change RogueLike Evo...
 

JacksHoff

Member
Jul 15, 2018
351
398
1) Because of how the AI were fed: with art collected on the internet without its creators knowing it and even less approving it. There is a name for that kind of thing: theft, hence me calling AI use for artistic purpose unethical since it's built upon mass-thievery of authentic artists.

2) You said it yourself, AI doesn't really deserve the "intelligence" in its name: the user is the one doing the thinking. But using your imagination to come up with an original idea is but the first step into making art: after that, you have to realize your concept. This implies mastering the tools of the trade, whatever art you're doing; with an AI, you skip this part by literally automating the executive process. The moment you stop actually involving yourself in the realization of your idea and get an automaton on it, you go from art to product*, hence me calling pics generated by AI so-called art.

*: to make it clear, I'm not a Luddite. I simply don't call whatever is mass-produced in factories (at our command too... ) art - and I don't think anyone does. There is a reason why handmade things are more valued...
the only hand a value is job
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lulu66638
4.40 star(s) 160 Votes