- Jun 7, 2024
- 21
- 15
Ren'Py Rogue-like: Evolution [v1.6e] [Oni]
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg anal sex animated big tits bukkake corruption creampie exhibitionism female protagonist footjob groping group sex handjob harem interracial lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf oral sex parody pov romance sandbox spanking stripping superpowers titfuck vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
- Jul 20, 2022
- 337
- 426
Even more proof of this being bull shit there is a panel of her literally drooling over Spider-Man's dick
- Oct 24, 2018
- 566
- 1,253
Bah, I say just ignore whole Thumblr fanfic part and leave it with worst fate imaginable.
Being forgotten because how mediocre bland and sanitized it is.
- Mar 9, 2018
- 3,190
- 9,535
That ain't sanitized it's dirty. Also Shepard you're alive, how is spess?
- Jun 12, 2021
- 93
- 160
Marvel writers don't talk to each other or feel bound by past choices unless specifically instructed by editorial. Marvel's Editor-In-Chief since 2017 has been C. B. Cebulski, perhaps best known for pretending to be Asian and writing as Akira Yoshida during the mid 00s on a handful of Japanese-centric titles.
- Apr 26, 2020
- 1,590
- 5,417
I think they do talk to each other, about how to progress their common ideology, and their values seem to reflect those of their chief.
- Aug 20, 2020
- 325
- 245
When I saw the game developer badge I thought our guy finally leaves his stinky room for some conversation
- Jun 12, 2021
- 93
- 160
The common ideology is "I like having a job in this shit economy" and "I don't want to get fired." Their values are maintaining a good reputation as someone who is easy to work with in an incredibly competitive market.
Everything else is branding set by Marvel/Disney's marketing department based on what they think is the most profitable strategy.
- Apr 26, 2020
- 1,590
- 5,417
It's funny the way you said it, because that's exactly what I meant, vis a vie the same values as their chief
- May 16, 2022
- 321
- 1,348
Chester Bror Cebulski - I mean, IS there a more neckbeard name? Nice to know that White people pretending to be Asian is a-okay.
The implication that she's being impregnated here befuddles me. Do AI's think this is how babby is formed? Who would even be the father here? The beej recipient or the guy splooging off screen? Is it both somehow? Are these the necessary circumstances for a mutant to conceive? This might be more complicated than hare mating dances.
- Oct 24, 2018
- 566
- 1,253
been living 2 hours away from active military conflict for past 2 years, so its been intresting to say the leaast.
But back on topic. i was indeed suprsed by Oni actually just adding in 3 girls in game back to back since me last checking it.
- May 16, 2022
- 321
- 1,348
She's sitting on a dong - just accept that she's sitting on a dong. But if you want real proof of mutantcy/9001-hours-in-drunken-MSPaint, count the fingers.
- Apr 14, 2020
- 2,148
- 8,290
But thats bullshit because none of this turns a profit, Marvel comics hasnt been profitable for years.
- Apr 21, 2017
- 571
- 2,155
Disney didn't buy Marvel Comics for it's profitability, they bought Marvel for it's back catalog of stories. To them it's worth losing a couple of million each year if it means access to 85 years of stories to adapt.
- Apr 26, 2020
- 1,590
- 5,417
6 fingers, its revenge time
I think it would be fair to characterize it as a supreme misunderstanding of market share, not unlike the Lucasfilm purchase
- Apr 14, 2020
- 2,148
- 8,290
Yeah of course, what im arguing against is the point that this is what Disney finds profitable.
The current state of Marvel its entirely its own fault, even if Disney hadnt bought it, it would still be like this.
Everything since civil war should be scrapped.
- Jun 12, 2021
- 93
- 160
This is what Disney finds profitable *as branding.* But keep in mind that the least selling Marvel books out perform the strongest Dark Horse/IDW/etc titles, and that they make up a lot of income from merch, licensing, trades, Marvel Unlimited, etc.
If you want to be very cynical about it, corporate America - with all the metrics, research, and experts they throw millions if not billions of dollars at every year - is making a clear statement about what ideology is winning the culture war with who they decide to pander to, and which ideology is increasingly irrelevant within the marketplace of ideas. And that goes well beyond just Disney.
But in the end the only ideology that matters is Rogue's ass.
If you want to be very cynical about it, corporate America - with all the metrics, research, and experts they throw millions if not billions of dollars at every year - is making a clear statement about what ideology is winning the culture war with who they decide to pander to, and which ideology is increasingly irrelevant within the marketplace of ideas. And that goes well beyond just Disney.
But in the end the only ideology that matters is Rogue's ass.
Last edited:
- Apr 26, 2020
- 1,590
- 5,417
If I wanted to be cynical, I would say corporate period. If I wanted to be passively inflammatory I might make unnecessary specifications about rogues ass.
- May 16, 2022
- 321
- 1,348
Sorry all, I'm gonna be breaking up this quote/reply for easier reading.
Now, if a certain ideology is "winning the culture war", then why is there a war to begin with? Some would have people believe that it's "wacist/sexist neckbeards" vs "University-Enlightened" but...is it really? Why is it then that the post-Endgame projects have all been "critically praised/viewer meh"? Why is it that the people who are being pandered to...aren't spending money but just typing about it on Twitter/X or whatever instead? If I were running a business I would start asking questions to the Marketing folks. Of course, this also calls-in the various whispers that the ideology we're all skirting around like an elephant-in-the-room here is being directly pushed and funded by a very specific person who runs a very profitable company that handles the 401k's and other investments of hundreds of millions (if not billions) of people for his own reasons.
I would also argue that the ideology isn't winning, it's getting pushed back against harder than ever as the regular folk start to understand just what that ideology is all about.
Which isn't saying much as these have always been smaller publications, with Dark Horse & IDW getting most of it's profit from licensing and/or niche titles that appeal to a certain subset of readers. Compare Marvel & DC to pretty much any manga publisher and the money the comics make becomes a joke...which is why Disney is trying to buy-up exclusive rights and control over manga publishers.
I argue against that. When Disney was focused on making a great Marvel product (almost everything up to Endgame) that catered to the comic fans, each movie (save one or two) made profit. Maybe not as much as they COULD have if (roughly guesstimating) $300,000,000 wasn't spent on marketing and advertising along with production, but $1B on $300M is still a good return. After Endgame...what the heck happened? Disney tried to use the Marvel "license to print money" to shore-up its mega-expensive/barely-profitable Disney+. They scaled back on the production (even for movies) and let lesser-known writers and directors in to save money. People who really weren't that good at their profession given their previous works (generally speaking and IMHO).
Now, if a certain ideology is "winning the culture war", then why is there a war to begin with? Some would have people believe that it's "wacist/sexist neckbeards" vs "University-Enlightened" but...is it really? Why is it then that the post-Endgame projects have all been "critically praised/viewer meh"? Why is it that the people who are being pandered to...aren't spending money but just typing about it on Twitter/X or whatever instead? If I were running a business I would start asking questions to the Marketing folks. Of course, this also calls-in the various whispers that the ideology we're all skirting around like an elephant-in-the-room here is being directly pushed and funded by a very specific person who runs a very profitable company that handles the 401k's and other investments of hundreds of millions (if not billions) of people for his own reasons.
I would also argue that the ideology isn't winning, it's getting pushed back against harder than ever as the regular folk start to understand just what that ideology is all about.
This is true.
Last edited: