Sukme
Well-Known Member
- Dec 21, 2017
- 1,350
- 1,476
- 351
Get close enough, put the faint dot in the middle of the screen on the door(will turn white) , press "E".
i dont get it, is the game over once you order the cable on sunday or what am i supposed to do?
BlackenedAngel
Newbie
- May 27, 2023
- 29
- 41
- 99
Yeah, that's as far as you can go for now.
Whats the point in releasing something thats this early stage and low on content
This is basically just a very slow intro sequence
This is basically just a very slow intro sequence
IllumiNaughty
Newbie
- Aug 5, 2017
- 30
- 46
- 135
There are plenty of games here that are "in development" and you should know this considering how long you've been here. So why even say this in the first place?
HumbleBumbleBee
Member
- Jul 24, 2024
- 147
- 278
- 92
for some reason f95zone keeps attracting the most of angry, bitter individuals and keeps turning good-natured people into arrogants snobs here. I kinda hope this game thread would get spared from it but winning the jackpot in lottery is more likely than that.
Sukme
Well-Known Member
- Dec 21, 2017
- 1,350
- 1,476
- 351
Like the art style...bit buggy. Played 1st version and it froze after Aunt showed you the room then left(couldn't unpack/move). Played 2nd and it froze getting the chips. Loaded new fix still froze, deleted the saves and game and loaded a new game and its back to freezing after Aunt shows you the room.
- Oct 22, 2023
- 265
- 488
- 196
Hi everyone, amazing update as always! The game is progressing well and makes me want to discover more and more! Quick question: was I the only one stuck at the grocery store? I was able to collect everything except the apple; it was impossible to pick up.
This early access apologist shit is so annoying. Theres is no game here, no content.
Its pre-alpha internal testing shit that completely wastes your time.
The answer is patreon money, obviously.
I see a promising opening scene. I hope there will be some H content in the next update, as there is none in the current version.
The game might be in a very early stage of development, but there is effort being put in it. This doesn't look like a cash grab. It's free anyway, so why get mad?
So many completely braindead (or more likely shills from the dev's discord) goons are giving it 5 stars for a nearly contentless demo. Who are you people that do this? Why?
The review system is utterly pointless without some kind of ACTUAL moderation of it. Reviews shouldn't even be open for this.
The review system is utterly pointless without some kind of ACTUAL moderation of it. Reviews shouldn't even be open for this.
I disagree with you. It is obvious that a 5 star rating for this demo is not comparable to the 5 stars of a complete and structured game. Each review is based to the category.
Probably to avoid wasting time, a "demo" or "alpha" tag should be added so as to improve the distinction.
There are no shills of the programmer. This game (or rather, DEMO) is undoubtedly original. Something innovative and intriguing. The developer deserves the compliments he receving. Those who put 5 stars are hoping that this startup becomes something concrete as soon as possible.
The emotions transmitted by the programmer must be recognized and rewarded, even if it is for a banal prototype.
The purpose of a review is to inform. 5 stars for literally nothing is a joke - a complete inversion of the purpose, delivering severely wrong information and making people think there is something worth their time here. It is a lie. Any 5 star review for an empty, buggy demo is a lie. This demo is not original at all. It is a generic VN played in first person. Walking simulators are not new.
"those who put 5 stars are hoping" - proving my point. They are basing their review off their own imagination, not reality. They are lying. "The emotions transmitted by the programmer must be recognized" - that's what comments are for. Only actual results deserve high reviews. A review is not to jerk off the developer. A review is to inform consumers.
As for the actual quality of reviews - the number of reviews is much higher than average. The quality of reviews is much lower than typical as well. Multiple extremely generic and short "I like it 5 stars" type bullshit reviews indicate shills.
HumbleBumbleBee
Member
- Jul 24, 2024
- 147
- 278
- 92
Prove your point and cast your own review into it for the game only. Ignore the meta of how people review. You're just pointing out how flawed direct democracy is even without politics.
Don't forget to start with a disclaimer what version you played as you type out your review
ChudBuddy
Member
- Apr 18, 2023
- 276
- 483
- 196
The vaginal sex tag fooled me into edging myself into what amounts to blue balling myself.
Yeah, TECHNICALLY the tag isn't lying but come on, add a big ALPHA VERSION or something in the title.
Agree with the Alpha Tag.
The vaginal sex tag fooled me into edging myself into what amounts to blue balling myself.
Yeah, TECHNICALLY the tag isn't lying but come on, add a big ALPHA VERSION or something in the title.
Dev, had it if you don't want to unleash the wrath of the players