It's not about the assets.. well, for me at least..
Use AssetRipper from GitHub (can't post link, haven't reach 3 posts yet lol, google it.)
Use it... Point it out to the .assets file you have installed from the game (in this particular game, the file that stored the actual in game "picture" is called "sharedassets1.assets" (the file is located inside the _Data folder) after you select it you should see a green button that says "View Loaded Files", you don't have to view it, just export (click the tab on the upper left) and click "Export All Files", Select a folder you want to export the assets to, and then click "export primary content", it should export all the assets from the game to the selected folder.
Honestly, this is complete crap. Games are what games are for. I can find regular PNG art on some Twitter, a TON of such art.
I haven't tried it, but if the protection is at least decent, then it won't work.
Well, there's a leaked Windows version, so if you are curious and aren't a Mac user like I am you could give it a shot.
I took a spin through the Patreon page for free members and the Discord. Don't see any announced date. The current version is still in pre-alpha, so I imagine that it's still gonna be a while before a full public version drops.
I think I'll pass. Porn indie games with integrated anti piracy solutions are messy, sometimes leaving behind traces in windows registry. Fortunately, there are other fish in the sea, so to speak. If, somewhere down the line, the dev goes back to how it was before, or the protection turns out to be unintrusive I might play this again. Still, best of luck to anyone trying it.
It’s just starting to seem to me that the author puts “alpha” out of habit. These are the most common, playable builds, they have nothing that accompanies the alpha versions. Technically.
I think public releases are scheduled weeks after the chapter is finalized. This is a pre-alpha of an unfinished chapter, so the earliest we can expect it is mid October.
I don't think it would be the case, it could behave like that in theory (the author of the method just want an "elegant way" of giving access to authorized user when offline without taking up another memory, but in this particular case its cached in the user's phone)
Was that.. a slang? You really shouldn't do that in international forum.. I thought you were insulting me..
