- Oct 22, 2017
- 1,414
- 2,526
Yeah of course, but no one is gonna share it with you til the end of the month.any change log for upcoming update?
Yeah of course, but no one is gonna share it with you til the end of the month.any change log for upcoming update?
With SU being a one man show, and its relative size we need to stay pretty lean on things we add. Sound was something we immediately removed as it doesn't add that much value in comparison to animations or other things. Now with any future projects such as our Newgrounds game and any other project afterwards sound will be included.So I know there are no plans to include any voice acting, which is a decision I agree with. But will there ever be -any- sound? A couple royalty free background musics and royalty free menu sound effects go a LONG way to improving the atmosphere.
Yet you are here posting. Must not be that bad of a game or update schedule if people like you keep coming back huh?One page ago, "lmao people will complain about milking"
This page "hey uh, you're not getting anything really this two month cycle because of...uh...stuff. B-but later! Yeah later you'll get something. Please pay two months for one release with nothing noticeable added. Thenk."
Work is being done, what Haseo was trying to do was not spoil what was going on. Last months build was "a buggy piece of shit" (not my words but the community) so what do we do? We go and fix a bunch of stuff in order to remedy that. SR7 tackled animations this month, he worked on several with the expectation that he could finish them. Unfortunately they are not up to snuff (due to the community not wanting a buggy piece of shit). Remember the doing X instead of Y thing I mentioned as #2 complaint. I wasn't laughing when I posted that comment, I was being sarcastic, meaning that those comments were going to come irregardless of the content or production value of what we put out.One page ago, "lmao people will complain about milking"
This page "hey uh, you're not getting anything really this two month cycle because of...uh...stuff. B-but later! Yeah later you'll get something. Please pay two months for one release with nothing noticeable added. Thenk."
Wow $20 just to vote!!?Hey, Haseo and Smokey,
I've noticed you guys have reached a bit of a plateau for your monthly income on Patreon and I have a suggestion. The $20 and $50 patrons don't receive anything more than gratitude and from what I've seen on here, a lot of people are usually upset with what SR7 decides to work on for each new build. Why not develop a voting system? SR7 can come up with a sheet of characters and their content that needs to be developed and voters can decide on who and what they want for the next build. It can be a point based system with $20 patrons having their votes count as 1 point and $50 patrons having their votes count as 3. It might not bring in any new patrons, but some of the insider (maybe even basic level) patrons would probably bump up their monthly contributions for that kind of offer.
Obviously, the voting system would need to be refined a bit more to match SR7's workload and it would have to meet certain time limits so that he can have his full agenda before starting on each build, but maybe you can run the idea past him and see if it's something you guys think would work.
At least it's better than giving $20 and receiving no more than those who give $10.Wow $20 just to vote!!?
Thats a bargain
Thats a good point but everyone who pledged should be able to vote not just the higher tierAt least it's better than giving $20 and receiving no more than those who give $10.
It'd be a point based system, so maybe those that pledge at $5 and $10 could vote, but those that pledge more would have greater weight with their votes. It seems only fair that those willing to pledge $50 should have much more say than those only pledging $5. Still, this is only a suggestion and a rough draft at best. It would need some refinement, and that's considering the SR7 team even likes the idea at all.Thats a good point but everyone who pledged should be able to vote not just the higher tier
Yeah i agree with you but they rather go with yearly update than a voting systemIt'd be a point based system, so maybe those that pledge at $5 and $10 could vote, but those that pledge more would have greater weight with their votes. It seems only fair that those willing to pledge $50 should have much more say than those only pledging $5. Still, this is only a suggestion and a rough draft at best. It would need some refinement, and that's considering the SR7 team even likes the idea at all.
Yeah, but the whole point of the voting system isn't just to make the whole process more consumer friendly. It's also to try and get them more money, which will help them build their team. They've been hovering around $9600-$9800 a month for quite a while now and that's still quite a ways off from their goal of $11,000. This system adds extra incentive for people to pledge more. People who want a say/greater say in what content they want at the end of the two months will shell out more and the SR7 team's monthly income increases. This should lead to the team growing and, hopefully, newer/better content coming out.Yeah i agree with you but they rather go with yearly update than a voting system
Unless they offer more, they are stuck with figuring out ways to get new patrons to pledge money as their only way of increasing their monthly income.Good luck trying to get some creative control out of Sunsetriders7's hands.
They could increase their worktime by making it a tree month updateUnless they offer more, they are stuck with figuring out ways to get new patrons to pledge money as their only way of increasing their monthly income.