Unity Spicy Quest: To Deep Infinity and Beyond [v0.05a] [Wrong Animal Games]

[ukulele]

Hey Ruer27,

I want to make it absolutely clear that all of my illustrations are hand-drawn by me without the use of AI.
Since I'm working on this project solo, I always try to find efficient ways to manage my workload. This includes reusing certain elements like weapons or props by copying them into different compositions. That’s exactly what happened in this case.
Large-scale, detailed illustrations take a lot of time. I try to focus on the important parts and simplify less essential areas to keep my workflow manageable.
As I’ve already stated, I draw in my own way and continue to develop my style over time. If others believe they can do it better that’s perfectly fine. But I stand by my work even if there are flaws in anatomy or perspective.
Unfounded accusations like this are harmful and discourage open, creative sharing. I''m happy to answer genuine questions, but I ask people to differentiate between personal style, reuse of assets, and actual AI-generated content.

Best regards!

PS: In case you didnt notice the helmets, clouds, and spaceships were simply duplicated. Only the background was mirrored.
These are simple but effective techniques I use to achieve the best possible results with limited time.
There will always be people who don’t like my work and thats perfectly fine. But there are also those who appreciate it and they’re the ones I want to focus on.
I hope you're one of them

View attachment 5092903

It's easy,

Announce and host a drawing stream to prove your mettle. If you do not, people will believe what they will.

 

[kuraiken]

It's easy,

Announce and host a drawing stream to prove your mettle. If you do not, people will believe what they will.

To be fair, people will believe what they will.
If someone really wants to disbelieve, they can argue after the stream:
- "Being able to draw does not mean someone didn't use AI art. So okay, you can draw. But you also used AI art."
- "You asked/payed someone else to draw for you on the stream."
- "You didn't actually draw that. You prerecorded it being drawn by someone else, then replayed it on stream."

Just out of curiosity - if they were to actually do a drawing stream, would you in turn then sub to their patreon if it turns they were drawing the images?

What personally would absolutely convince me would be the layered files of say, two of the images, so you can see the seperate layers of the original images (not just a small cross-section of a part of the image). AI draws everything at once on a single layer, so being able to show how the original images are composites of multiple layers is a pretty clear sign that it was drawn by a human.

 

[Ruer27]

An artist can change the design of the monster between sketch and the line art.

I'm getting mixed results. There are discrepancies, and there are some of the pixel boxes that can come from AI, but they could also be the result of the avif format and compression.

Testing of AI Detectors is not exactly definitive:

Spoiler: decopy AI

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Spoiler: undetectable AI

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Spoiler: wasitai

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Spoiler: sightengine

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Other elements that suggest it may not be AI are the way eyes are designed (very clear and simple design) and the usage of simplistic colors instead of complex gradients. (Shadow color, highlight color, not sophisticated gradients)
The general design of the characters armor (helmets, chest piece) is mostly congruous and simple and lacks the nonsensical additions AI does on the detail level.

But I'm also not exactly familiar with the current state of AI trickery.
From what I see, I'd hesitate to call it AI Art, despite some incongruencies.

You don't understand the way he made differend head structure for every leazzardmen is very unlikely. The best way scenario you will draw 2 different head structures (anatomy wise) and just change the proportions. The problem with the scetch is that it isn't the scetch he had 3 different scetchs in the begining + that is clearly a thumb anomaly here

That is how the correct thumb should look like everyone can compare to his own self hope it helps to understand how AI fuckerd i up

 

[ThaWulf]

To be honest some of the images have parts that look pretty AI, but then parts look if not drawn by hand, at least fixed by hand drawing. If it's one dude, wouldn't be surprised if they use AI to fill stuff in, and then focus on the main characters for their drawing. Or draw one enemy then use AI to duplicate multiple copies. This might throw AI detectors off I would assume.

None of that is an issue, I've played some games that are really good, and use AI to make up for the lack of artistic talent or lack of funds by the creator. But creators need to be up front about this kind of stuff.

 

[Ruer27]

To be fair, people will believe what they will.
If someone really wants to disbelieve, they can argue after the stream:
- "Being able to draw does not mean someone didn't use AI art. So okay, you can draw. But you also used AI art."
- "You asked/payed someone else to draw for you on the stream."
- "You didn't actually draw that. You prerecorded it being drawn by someone else, then replayed it on stream."

Just out of curiosity - if they were to actually do a drawing stream, would you in turn then sub to their patreon if it turns they were drawing the images?

What personally would absolutely convince me would be the layered files of say, two of the images, so you can see the seperate layers of the original images (not just a small cross-section of a part of the image). AI draws everything at once on a single layer, so being able to show how the original images are composites of multiple layers is a pretty clear sign that it was drawn by a human.

They are 100% use Ai and when edit images

To be honest some of the images have parts that look pretty AI, but then parts look if not drawn by hand, at least fixed by hand drawing. If it's one dude, wouldn't be surprised if they use AI to fill stuff in, and then focus on the main characters for their drawing. Or draw one enemy then use AI to duplicate multiple copies. This might throw AI detectors off I would assume.

None of that is an issue, I've played some games that are really good, and use AI to make up for the lack of artistic talent or lack of funds by the creator. But creators need to be up front about this kind of stuff.

The issue is that the dude is set that it is 100% hand drawn and Ai isn't used

 

[Ruer27]

To be honest some of the images have parts that look pretty AI, but then parts look if not drawn by hand, at least fixed by hand drawing. If it's one dude, wouldn't be surprised if they use AI to fill stuff in, and then focus on the main characters for their drawing. Or draw one enemy then use AI to duplicate multiple copies. This might throw AI detectors off I would assume.

None of that is an issue, I've played some games that are really good, and use AI to make up for the lack of artistic talent or lack of funds by the creator. But creators need to be up front about this kind of stuff.

That is how the correct thumb should look like everyone can compare to his own self hope it helps to understand how AI fuckerd i up

Like for real

 

[kuraiken]

That is how the correct thumb should look like everyone can compare to his own self hope it helps to understand how AI fuckerd i up

Like for real

I genuinely don't know what that is meant to show?
Where's the issue?

 

[KingRocket]

I'm not an artist, but as someone who browsed enough art on Pixiv and such, I would say that these drawing definitely feel like it been hand-edited after being made by A.I.
The quality of the art is strange, with the suspected edited parts to be more amateur-ish. They also got that shiny, glossy look that are typical of A.I.

But hey, I am not here to diss on A.I.
And if Dev truly drew these and that we are wrong, then simply prove it.
I'll be happy to be proven wrong.

 

[Ruer27]

I genuinely don't know what that is meant to show?
Where's the issue?

Top part of the thumbed got doubled and shifted other parts

So the correct one is:

3 surfaces and 2 connection points
But we got:

4 surfaces and 3 connection points simply cause one part was doubled


A bit more specific:
Correct

WTF?

 

[xibao99]

<incoherent meltdown>

Not sure if you're more in need of a shrink, a hand surgeon, or an art teacher. The first post you made had a point, this one's illuminati on the dollar bill conspiracy level

 

[Ruer27]

Not sure if you're more in need of a shrink, a hand surgeon, or an art teacher. The first post you made had a point, this one's illuminati on the dollar bill conspiracy level

A person asked me to show what exactly is wrong with a thumb - I explained. Not every one knows anatomy apparently

 

[xibao99]

Not every one knows anatomy aparantly

I thought you were trying to prove it's AI art, not that the guy's a real artist who makes subtle mistakes on one of like 5 background alien characters

 

[Ruer27]

I thought you were trying to prove it's AI art, not that the guy's a real artist who makes subtle mistakes on one of like 5 background alien characters

That is not a mistake that people make and I'm serious: humans mess up proportions, perspective, but would never accidently double some body parts + every other background alien character like this have a correct thumb structure. You don't draw much do you? If so then I can understand why we have different reaction and that is fine. I won't waste more time on proving it is AI, for me it is obvious everyone else think what they want or ask someone more trustworthy in AI art subject

 

[xibao99]

It's obvious to me that this is almost or entirely cleaned/traced AI too, you're just not showing any evidence of a doubled body part there. Clearly you draw too much yourself, seeing as your "correct" thenar eminence looks like a cancerous cyst that's jutting out of the palm at an odd angle. You actually made it worse than it was:

Seeing as you didn't take any issue with the much more blatantly malformed hypothenar eminence either, or the stub of a pinkie finger, I don't wanna imagine what your own hand looks like if that's the reference

 

[Ruer27]

It's obvious to me that this is almost or entirely cleaned/traced AI too, you're just not showing any evidence of a doubled body part there. Clearly you draw too much yourself, seeing as your "correct" thenar eminence looks like a cancerous cyst that's jutting out of the palm at an odd angle. You actually made it worse than it was:

Seeing as you didn't take any issue with the much more blatantly malformed hypothenar eminence either, or the stub of a pinkie finger, I don't wanna imagine what your own hand looks like if that's the reference

This is clearly a part of thumb's phalange with a nail which got pushed downward instead, this means it got doubled and I just puted it in the correct place. I didn't draw anything except the line: I used parts of original image
Edit: eng isn't my native language so had todo some editing

 

[Dr.Games]

To be fair, people will believe what they will.
If someone really wants to disbelieve, they can argue after the stream:
- "Being able to draw does not mean someone didn't use AI art. So okay, you can draw. But you also used AI art."
- "You asked/payed someone else to draw for you on the stream."
- "You didn't actually draw that. You prerecorded it being drawn by someone else, then replayed it on stream."

Just out of curiosity - if they were to actually do a drawing stream, would you in turn then sub to their patreon if it turns they were drawing the images?

What personally would absolutely convince me would be the layered files of say, two of the images, so you can see the seperate layers of the original images (not just a small cross-section of a part of the image). AI draws everything at once on a single layer, so being able to show how the original images are composites of multiple layers is a pretty clear sign that it was drawn by a human.

Hey kuraiken,

nowadays it's really hard to believe that there are still artists out there who draw their works completely by themself but yes, they exist. Hello!
the idea of Spicy Quest came to me back in 2016. That time I started writing the story, lore and short stories about the world of Spicy Quest. I had many starts with the project and many failed. But after a lot of time, sweat and tears I finally managed to release my first version 0.01 in 2022.
My old artworks can still be found on DeviantArt. Since I learned how to hold a pencil i never let it go. Drawing became a part of my life. Over the time I teached myself my personal drawing style and I still use it today. For some people the pictures are good for others… well, you can see.
There are no artists who work for free because we also need to buy food. Just like me.
The picture people are "nicely" discussing here, I spent more than 100 hours on it. I will not give away my work for free just to impress some people who don’t even respect what I do.

If you really interested in my work, you are welcome to join my Patreon community.
From Tier 4, you will get full behind-the-scenes insights, sketches, concepts, tools I use, and how the ideas for my artworks was born and created.

Best regards!

 

[Jash83]

With everyone splitting hairs putting this art under the microscope to try and determine whether it's AI-drawn or not, I think we might have lost sight of the more important question: does it look any good or not?

I think it does.

And seriously, the reason AI art generally sucks so much is that, aside from the visible fuck-ups, it all has a distinctive "AI art look" that makes it all look samey and interchangeable. This doesn't have that look at all.

 

[Fazed]

View attachment 5094662
This is clearly a part of thumb's phalange with a nail which got pushed downward instead, this means it got doubled and I just puted it in the correct place. I didn't draw anything except the line: I used parts of original image
Edit: eng isn't my native language so had todo some editing

Take a rest brother. AI zealots are cringe. Artists are people and people make mistakes.

 

[xibao99]

View attachment 5094662
This is clearly a part of thumb's phalange with a nail which got pushed downward instead, this means it got doubled and I just puted it in the correct place. I didn't draw anything except the line: I used parts of original image
Edit: eng isn't my native language so had todo some editing

While I still think it's a pretty obscure argument, I see what you meant now and in the previous posts with the numbers. I think the best proof is in this guy's weaselly posts. He says he takes 100 hours for one pic, but completely redraws almost the exact same pose for a cumshot? Radically changes the angle of the guy's stomach for no apparent reason, and redraws the dick with like 10 extra nutsack creases for the hell of it?

Spoiler: pics

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Talks about how he makes extensive use of duplication etc, but you couldn't point out a SINGLE instance (I dare you to try) where any two things or body parts or anything else are actually the same - or altered in a way that wouldn't require completely redrawing them? Ruer27's wisdom:

Spoiler: quote

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

And this was all 100% hand drawn by the same guy who prior to generative AI getting good, could only pull off identical full frontal and 3/4 angles with static poses for character sprites that only sometimes seem to have a resemblance to the AI generated CG, style and quality wise?

Spoiler: pics

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

inb4 "this is early art from 2016", these are both from right here in the previews. I'm 100% willing to believe that someone could improve as much in around a year as his

You must be registered to see the links

page seems to suggest, though. I just don't buy it here. The rift in quality between

You must be registered to see the links

and

You must be registered to see the links

is enormous... and if you look at the rest of the gallery, you might agree it's also inconsistent. Anyway, compare these character sprites above to the CG. The picture with the marines at least matches in the style of rendering (look at the lips), as do the brown chick's scenes:

Spoiler: pics

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

The handjob pic earlier? Completely different style. Compare the simple shading on the CG above or the character sprites to the panorama with the marines, or the demons, or the other CGs. This one below a bit of both and a bit of neither. Compare the two green aliens and the two asari-looking freaks to the rest of the faces, look at the teeth and the reflections.

Spoiler: pic

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

I'm seeing 3 types of pictures overall: ones he drew himself (all character standing sprites), ones he traced and edited likely from a model he taught on his own art (brown chick's CG, some of the faces in the futa advertisement, the big panorama with the marines), and then the ones where he gave up and just took generic AI output and processed, traced, vectorized, whatever.

Take a rest brother. AI zealots are cringe. Artists are people and people make mistakes.

Fortunately all he's gotta do to fix it is add the missing tag.

 

[ecroose]

do i get to fuck a big dicked deathclaw or have a harem of big dicked deathclaw?