- Aug 4, 2020
- 2,567
- 3,299
There is a filter and a category bar under the search box.is there any way to actually search on that civitai site?? or is there just filtering by category
I think the problem with generating porn is that it requires two (or more) humans to be in actual contact. This is something that SD inherently struggles with as it has no concept of how human bodies interact.There is a filter and a category bar under the search box.
You still have to bang your head a lot to get results even with the checkpoints that are supposed to do the stuff they say, that's why you rarely will see a good blowjob picture for example.
Some styles are quite easy to get with any checkpoint, and some checkpoints are a little too hostile for porn, so at some point you have to compromise and see what thing is harder to get, usually the porn part is harder to get in a stylistic checkpoint than a style in a porn checkpoint.
There are blowjob specific checkpointsThere is a filter and a category bar under the search box.
You still have to bang your head a lot to get results even with the checkpoints that are supposed to do the stuff they say, that's why you rarely will see a good blowjob picture for example.
Some styles are quite easy to get with any checkpoint, and some checkpoints are a little too hostile for porn, so at some point you have to compromise and see what thing is harder to get, usually the porn part is harder to get in a stylistic checkpoint than a style in a porn checkpoint.
check out the scripts. I just learned about it by Naytahn in the URPM discord. You can use it to generate a grid with images comparing different parameters that you set ex prompt or step or CFG etc.Do you guys keep 2 or 3 SD tabs open in your browser to alternate different variations of prompts? For me that's key to keep tracking of things, I don't know if there is a more sophisticated way... Looking at the prompts from the pictures I generate is not the best, am I losing some kind of log function?
I tried them already, the interracial is decent, the other so so. I even tried one paizuri model a couple days ago and it was a total pain to use, not easy to get any results at all.There are blowjob specific checkpoints
You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 2396017
You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 2396033
When I said 'porn' I just meant erotic, nude hot poses, other than just standing pretty girls. Putting a sex picture together that looks alive is another monster, we will get there for sure, but it's really hard.I think the problem with generating porn is that it requires two (or more) humans to be in actual contact. This is something that SD inherently struggles with as it has no concept of how human bodies interact.
It's seen some pictures of that sort of thing, but it tends to get itself really confused and merges people into one another.
It's looking more and more like the best way to go is having trained models (LoRAs probably) for each position and / or type of intercourse and using those in addition to a model that handles nudity well.
I use the scripts for generating that kind of grids, even tried the x/y/z scripts, they are good when you already have a concept and want to get the best looking picture for a final release.check out the scripts. I just learned about it by Naytahn in the URPM discord. You can use it to generate a grid with images comparing different parameters that you set ex prompt or step or CFG etc.
Prompt matrix
View attachment 2396098
X/Y/Z plot (steps)
View attachment 2396108
X/Y/Z plot (Sampler)
View attachment 2396110
I have a GPU with 3Gb of VRAM and I can generate images without problems (as long as I keep the resolution at 512x512 or its equivalent aspect ratio) The key is in the parameters of the 'webui.user.bat' file. Right-click and select 'Edit'. The content of the file will appear in the Windows notepad. Look for the line of code 'set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=' and after the equals sign write the following: "--medvram --opt-split-attention" without "". Save the file and run the .bat again. It works like this for me and I haven't had any problems, unless I want to raise the resolution to more than 512x512. I hope it helps you if you still haven't solved it.well, looks like this ain't for me folks... --xdeformers and --lowvram was not enough...
F
View attachment 2355177
Who can find a black woman close to this prompt:
View attachment 2396136
Strangely I have such slim pickings, I can't even. And the end result is no where near what the prompt is suggesting. I.e. from time to time there are pretty ones, but nobody close to the prompt.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I did some testing.That prompt looks a bit suspicious in relation to the resulting image. You can fake that stuff by putting it in img2img and change the prompt text and then generate with 0 denoising. It's possible that he just got very lucky or did something else that doesn't show up in the meta data. Or Idk..Who can find a black woman close to this prompt:
Strangely I have such slim pickings, I can't even. And the end result is no where near what the prompt is suggesting. I.e. from time to time there are pretty ones, but nobody close to the prompt.
May be the guy just took some random pic and put it in img2img with some prompts, that will never give you the original picture using txt2txt from zero.I did some testing.That prompt looks a bit suspicious in relation to the resulting image. You can fake that stuff by putting it in img2img and change the prompt text and then generate with 0 denoising. It's possible that he just got very lucky or did something else that doesn't show up in the meta data. Or Idk..
Did some rounds with tweaking in between.
"beautiful black young woman from Africa with (beautiful face), (((enormous breasts))), plump figure, big hips, small waist, thick thighs, big afro hair, large hoop earrings.
posing for a picture on the street smiling hands in the air.
she wears (((tight Yellow long-sleeved shirt))) and (((tight black jeans))).
the location is (street, evening, depth of fields). digital painting, hyperrealism"
The result:
View attachment 2396503
There are of course more tweaking and improvements to be made.
Mr-Fox fr34ky gents, that's my prompt, sorry I didn't mention it.I did some testing.That prompt looks a bit suspicious in relation to the resulting image. You can fake that stuff by putting it in img2img and change the prompt text and then generate with 0 denoising. It's possible that he just got very lucky or did something else that doesn't show up in the meta data. Or Idk..
I thought the style looked familiar.. Derrrp.. completely misread your post..
I didn't understand the post completely eitherI thought the style looked familiar.. Derrrp.. completely misread your post..