Dude I read through all the pages (1-61) and the knowledge is really overwhelming. I noticed the discussion on this model and tried some stuff myself. But I want your opinion on this. Do you think the model used in these two are the same?
- Mar 11, 2023
- 46
- 132
oh yeah - my bad! I meant negative embeddingI took a look at his image and he didn't replicate the settings, he was not even using hires..
Negative lora? I didn't see any in the data, only the negative tags.
Did you mean negative embedding? "easy negative" I didn't notice this before.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I was just skimming messages and not really paying attention haha
- Mar 11, 2023
- 46
- 132
I vote yes for same model. It might be a different upscaler, or like photoshop after or something... the top one is just more golden-hour / warm tones
- Jul 4, 2017
- 2,589
- 4,721
2. find and follow some instructions to install the Automatic1111 local install
3. watch instruction videos on how to use stab diff webui
4. maybe download some alternate generative models like AnythingV3 or Kotomix. You get these from Civtai.
5. practice practice practice
6. go deeper by reading through public shared info in places like this:
You must be registered to see the links
Read the first post of this thread, it has lots of info to get you started.
Last edited:
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
First question is what kind of rig do you have? Amount of vram? Just so we know if you are hardware limited or not.
Where did you get it? If it was on civitai or a forum then maybe there are some clues in a comment wich checkpoint etc that was used. Other than figuring out wich checkpoint to use it's a process of working on the prompt, describing what you wish to see in the image and the negative prompt what you don't want to see in the image.
You can go to civitai and look for a checkpoint that has similar sample images and if they have shared the prompt, use it as a starting point. We can help you figuring out the settings and give suggestions about the prompt, but you need to get the ball rolling yourself. Besides it's much more satisfying to do things on your own
*Civitai is having some downtime atm, they are working on getting it up again.
You must be registered to see the links
Last edited:
- Dec 23, 2018
- 608
- 2,555
I wish I could get the photos to show the whole body rather than just the face/upper torso. Sometimes it shows a bit more but very rarely the whole person.
I've tried adding in things like high heels or long legs to try and train it to show full body, but no dice
Prompts in the png, checkpoint is Hyperv1
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
Try to add things like "cropped" "closeup" and anything else you can think of that describes what you don't want in the image and place it in negative prompt. In positive put things you want to see in the image such as "whole body view" "distanced" "zoomed out" or anything else you can think of that describes what you want to see in the image. People often forget to use the negative prompt and is only focusing on the positive tags and misses out on the most powerful way of using the prompt. The most powerful way is to use positive tags and negative for the same visual aspect.
Example
Positive Prompt: Something Small
Negative Prompt: Something Large
Then when you also add weight to it, it's dynamite stuff
Positive Prompt: Something Small:1.2
Negative Prompt: Something Large:1.2
You have put a very big emphasis on "Something Small" .
- Dec 21, 2020
- 1,575
- 3,776
So, about doing fullbody renders. Normally, if get a fullbody, including heels, then the face is messed up. If you get the face right, then the heels won't show. There is a workaround tho - it has been debated somewhere halfway through this thread.
What you do, is send the picture to inpaint, or somesuch, and get the SD to continue the image down from where the original was left off. This way you'll get the rest of the woman. Naturally, there is a gotcha as I think the quality drops notably.
- Oct 20, 2017
- 638
- 708
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
This could also be something to test.
You must be registered to see the links
There is an example for generating a full body character with "Regional Prompt Control".
- Sep 15, 2021
- 1,052
- 4,033
Try a non-square aspect ratio. After all, humans aren't 1:1.
512W x 768H gives good 3/4 length views a lot of the time, 512x960 is more likely to give good full-length shots (with the appropriate prompts).
I wouldn't recommend any more than that due to how SD makes non-1:1 ratio images. You greatly increase the chance of weird bodies.
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
A prompt from civitai that I reworked and I'm using it to try out new things and experimenting.
- Dec 23, 2018
- 608
- 2,555
Here's a strange one for all you folks who like to dive deep into the prompts, how did I get this output from the prompt that I used?
Hyper-realistic (full-length) portrait of a gorgeous whatever it is, Type and color hair, Color of eyes, buxom, voluptuous Type of creature, Location, with a detailed gorgeous face!! Full body, skimpy sexy (Armor or clothing type) (Any additional clothing or items) (topless, Bare Breasts), regal, elegant, lewd, realistic, hyper realistic, highly detailed, depth of field, Detailed and Intricate, Photo, HD, Cinematic, Dynamic Lighting,
I would expect wildly different outputs in each batch I run, but they are all the same medieval warrior women types. Maybe that's the answer to the 'whatever it is'. I just need to put in a command prompt for 'meaning of life, the universe and everything' and see if I get a glowing sparkly 42
Hyper-realistic (full-length) portrait of a gorgeous whatever it is, Type and color hair, Color of eyes, buxom, voluptuous Type of creature, Location, with a detailed gorgeous face!! Full body, skimpy sexy (Armor or clothing type) (Any additional clothing or items) (topless, Bare Breasts), regal, elegant, lewd, realistic, hyper realistic, highly detailed, depth of field, Detailed and Intricate, Photo, HD, Cinematic, Dynamic Lighting,
I would expect wildly different outputs in each batch I run, but they are all the same medieval warrior women types. Maybe that's the answer to the 'whatever it is'. I just need to put in a command prompt for 'meaning of life, the universe and everything' and see if I get a glowing sparkly 42
- Mar 11, 2023
- 46
- 132
"Voluptuous" - and the model was probably trained on fantasy women in skimpy magical armor! HahaHere's a strange one for all you folks who like to dive deep into the prompts, how did I get this output from the prompt that I used?
Hyper-realistic (full-length) portrait of a gorgeous whatever it is, Type and color hair, Color of eyes, buxom, voluptuous Type of creature, Location, with a detailed gorgeous face!! Full body, skimpy sexy (Armor or clothing type) (Any additional clothing or items) (topless, Bare Breasts), regal, elegant, lewd, realistic, hyper realistic, highly detailed, depth of field, Detailed and Intricate, Photo, HD, Cinematic, Dynamic Lighting,
View attachment 2552905
I would expect wildly different outputs in each batch I run, but they are all the same medieval warrior women types. Maybe that's the answer to the 'whatever it is'. I just need to put in a command prompt for 'meaning of life, the universe and everything' and see if I get a glowing sparkly 42
--
To the person that was asking about full body shots, have you tried: 512 x 768, or 512 x 1024 and (full body:1.4) ?
Hey. I'm having this problem when inpainting, there is some weird shadows out of nowhere on boobs or on the entire body.
prompts:
large boobs,natural skin texture, 4k textures, soft cinematic light, adobe lightroom, photolab, hdr, intricate, elegant, highly detailed, sharp focus, ((((cinematic look)))), soothing tones, insane details, intricate details, hyperdetailed, low contrast, soft cinematic light,exposure blend, hdr,, nude, naked, nsfw
Negative prompt: (deformed, distorted, disfigured:1.3), poorly drawn, bad anatomy, wrong anatomy, extra limb, missing limb, floating limbs, (mutated hands and fingers:1.4), disconnected limbs, mutation, mutated, ugly, disgusting, blurry, amputation, (clothes:1.4), monochrome, b&w, shadow
Steps: 60, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 6, Seed: 3068913324, Size: 512x512, Model hash: fe06753eee, Model: uberRealisticPornMerge_urpmv13Inpainting, Denoising strength: 0.6, Conditional mask weight: 1.0, Mask blur: 4
prompts:
large boobs,natural skin texture, 4k textures, soft cinematic light, adobe lightroom, photolab, hdr, intricate, elegant, highly detailed, sharp focus, ((((cinematic look)))), soothing tones, insane details, intricate details, hyperdetailed, low contrast, soft cinematic light,exposure blend, hdr,, nude, naked, nsfw
Negative prompt: (deformed, distorted, disfigured:1.3), poorly drawn, bad anatomy, wrong anatomy, extra limb, missing limb, floating limbs, (mutated hands and fingers:1.4), disconnected limbs, mutation, mutated, ugly, disgusting, blurry, amputation, (clothes:1.4), monochrome, b&w, shadow
Steps: 60, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 6, Seed: 3068913324, Size: 512x512, Model hash: fe06753eee, Model: uberRealisticPornMerge_urpmv13Inpainting, Denoising strength: 0.6, Conditional mask weight: 1.0, Mask blur: 4
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803