See how high resolution you can generate with SD and also how fast is the generation etc. What is the limit for this card with SD.Just art for the money! I need it and it's upgrade from my old Rysen+3070
What test
I have made many posts about how to use hires fixView attachment 2600558
20min from first txt2img try to final tile upscale. Multiple trials and errors
for testing:
Steps: 30, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 4248416645, Size: 1366x2048, Model hash: 4199bcdd14, Model: revAnimated_v122
Time taken: 1m 5s
Torch active/reserved: 13227/16938 MiB, Sys VRAM: 20536/24564 MiB (83.6%)
No module 'xformers' just stock A1111
View attachment 2600605
Steps: 30, Sampler: Euler a ,1024x1024 txt2img - Time taken: 13.35s
Never use Hi ress. and don't know to set it right![]()
If you want shiny just add "diffused light" or "diffuse glow" or both.. I have not messed with control net yet, it's on my to do list. But other than that, so far hires gives the best image quality with best details imo. It's why I always recommend it and promote it. What makes the big difference is the hires steps. You did not understand me correctly.Hiress.fix looks with more clear detailswhen zoom, but Tile looks more shiny overall.
View attachment 2601018
Meh, you paid too much for the card. I mean, if they are going to charge that price then give the appropriate amount of value. For $1600 it had better become sentient spontaneously and try to take over the planet.... and here is the place and time to brag for my new 13600k + RTX4090![]()
Fun policeMeh, you paid too much for the card. I mean, if they are going to charge that price then give the appropriate amount of value. For $1600 it had better become sentient spontaneously and try to take over the planet.
Yes this is the perfect place, awesome job and thank you for sharing this.Don't know if is correct place, and if someone need it, i've made a little batch file for fast watermark your image and not strip out metadata. Full detail onYou must be registered to see the links
Don't know if is correct place, and if someone need it, i've made a little batch file for fast watermark your image and not strip out metadata. Full detail onYou must be registered to see the links
Yes, you are in right, if someone use your same setting, config etc.. maybe reproduce it, but when you add watermark, more data is written inside png, also time of added watermark is written in.What's the point?
If you preserve the meta data, someone can just reproduce the image without the watermark..?
Not sure I understand the value / use case.