_SomeOneElse_
Newbie
- Jul 12, 2021
- 31
- 41
- 142
OT but nethertheless .. Imho it might seems like it, but there are huge differences in access and transparency.[..]
Ultimately I see AI as like Wikipedia was to Encyclopedias. It is an inevitable change and too useful of a tool. It is now a matter of regulating it, so that it can be harnessed like any tools that have been developed in modern times like GMO.
Wikipedia was and is created by people how contribute and review contributions. Everyone can see the history of chances and when and what was changed. The access is free and if someone can speak (read) more than one language, even more can be accessed or cross referenced. In generell an article reference the sources of it content / claims.
In comparison, the new "AI" tools are created by companies, the training data is selected (often pirated) by the company, so these companies will/can influence how these tools answer to our prompts. It is not transparent what was learned or skipped, changes are hidden if it just a service behind an api in the cloud. Many tools require payment or the payment is the uses of the tool and created/edited data itself. An references to the data that was used to answer our prompts is often not provided / possible.
jm2c