The main problem of that scene has always been its context. The scene itself is and has always been fine in itself, but the fact MC basically jumps into her bed (at least the first few times) while she's asleep and without any hint that he may be invited, is certainly questionable. As said, I'd expect that context to be changed.
I do not see here, no problem. After all, MC does not force Jenny into anything.
Thats because this scene was always done before the story writing of jenny was established as an update/patch. DC added this scene as others as ppl grew impatient of yet another girl they can watch but not fuck. In order to sell the game he simply added some fuck scenes.
You don't open the .rpa file. You put it in the game folder. I quote:
It's is extremely creepy at first, to say the least, which in itself would be somewhat out of character, too. As said, the story design of Jenny is pretty bad right now anyway and thus I'm happy that they'll change it. Thus this whole context will change anyway.
Well, Erik's/June's story will almost certainly change to that degree. DC said that he wasn't really happy with it a long time ago - though I have no idea how excatly he wants to handle it, now most/all choices will be removed. When it comes to Helen, we'll see. I'd personally not expect that her story will change a lot, but who knows.
That could possibly be said about the sofa and telescope scene but this scene has been part of her actual story. I personally don't really care if it stays or goes. The compromise to let it stay without reworking it is probably the best they can do. They won't have to spend any time on it and still those who like it will be happy.
I think you misunderstood me in my last post. Jenny didn't have a story until now. The whole point of the "Jenny Update" is to explain those scenes that are in the game with a story. DC always added sex scenes and afterwards explained them with a story update.
Well, she's got her basic story going (her becoming a cam girl with MC's help etc.) and that story is going to stay.
Well, until Roxxy he always released shorter updates which resulted in inclomplete stories. It basically meant that a character would get a basic story (like Erik, Mia, Daine and Jenny as well) which then had to be revised in another one or two updates. That did result in pretty bad updates which is why he went from ~50/60 day releases to 100/120 days.
Which is why i said he always established sex scenes first and then made the story. Jenny becoming a cam girl is not a story its a filler at best to not fuck her brains out with no context at all.
I think you've got it a little backwards. Back when the bigger part of Jenny's story writen in 0.12 (almost 2 years ago) the game wasn't meant to be this big and updates as complete as Roxxy weren't intended to happen. She was meant to get a normal second update which would have added an end to her story and that likely would have been it for the biggest part. So what we see now was meant to be a good part of her content and you can't judge it by today's standards. It's important to remember how much the game and its scale have changed in the last 2 years. Now DC has got the space to do 3 to 4 months updates which certainly wasn't something he would have dreamed of 2 years ago.
So I take it, that you interfered in DC's personal business, and posed this to this person, without DC's knowledge, request or approval?
Like I said. Too busy. Also his art isn't that close to DC, maybe you should get your eyes checked, dude.
I think that the point that Yggalf is making is that Jenny's story was never truly complete and her rework will make it more complete from a story background. Let's also remember that the Patreon rule change also affected her story by forcing her specific update to about now. That certainly gives DC more room to make her more complete, but as it stands, her character suffered in the game with very unclear intentions on how to progress without some janky character progression. (No, I'm not going to say it's rapey or not. It was just tedious and out of character.)
