Case in point, cool. What you said is a perfect example of that. All you did was reply by saying "nope" which is just as helpful as saying "bad update". Nothing descriptive or constructive. There weren't any examples or anything. Just for the sake of discussion if you want to bring more to the table for people to work with, you want to add more to what you say instead of making simple unbacked statements. Otherwise if I had any interest in continuing this discussion, I'd have to fish out all the reasoning from you. This isn't even relevant to SS anymore, it's necessary just to carry out basic discussions in any game.
You could've said it was bugged which is a valid point on the technical side albeit it has nothing to do with the plot, but almost all updates have bugs. It'll also be fixed shortly. Otherwise the story has been decided in the votes, and everything being worked on is clearly laid out for all the patreon members
well.. i vsnt b answering the same question over and over now, can i?
just because you havent seen any, doesnt mean it isnt there.
looks like you havent seen the discussion over loss scenes, or over the time it took to just remake the same old scenes, nor the bugs nor anything ¬¬
so whats the point? Ppl that want to defend the update wont read it anyway lol..
not to mention, when DC was talking about making a new Diane and Jenny update, i was still a patrn.. And me and the majority said " no need for a character overhaul.. just add new scenes".. many ppl voted for her and Diane because of that.. When they noticed that wasnt the case, they stopped voting for it.. Thats why you can see a HUGE drop in votes for debbie and erik's mom.
basically everything wrong has already been mentioned.
YOu will see numerous coments talking about that..
but ppl defending the update rely on 3 basic arguments:
1- "No, you're wrong. Its a good update!"
2- "Thats because the update was rushed because ppl kept whining!"
3- "If you dont like it, dont support it!"
lol
