Squark ⚧❤️

Conversation Conqueror
Jun 16, 2017
7,102
7,885
when updtae release?
Considering that it's 45% as of today... You can figure the rest out yourself.

It's about frigging time Rhonda got an update. Good stuff, Cookie.
I'd still love to see Vee joining Diane's farm.

The post titled "Multiple Endings or Linear Stories?" sounds interesting. (Yes I know it's almost a month ago now, but anyway)
I suggest a kind of multiple ending shot.
What I mean is one core ending and a small epilogue piece for each of the characters - but just the one you went with.
This would make a harem ending a fuckton of work, if Cookie's going with that angle.
 
Last edited:

j4yj4m

Forum Fanatic
Jun 19, 2017
4,159
6,112
What I mean is one core ending and a small epilogue piece for each of the characters - but just the one you went with.
I guess there's a good chance we may get something like that for the school girls once the dating system and the prom are implemented. Maybe not a full "epilog" but a somewhat unique prom sex scene which hopefully gets a little bit of additional dialog. For everybody else my hopes aren't that high, though. Maybe for Debbie if we are lucky... but that's just me guessing.
This would make a harem ending a fuckton of work, if Cookie's going with that angle.
I doubt the harem stuff will ever be really conclusive. You'll probably be able to invite some school girls to the beach house where you can unlock a few scenes depending on who is there and on which furniture you've bought, but that's it. As you say, everything else seems just impossible given what we know about the development process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squark ⚧❤️

PePeTheCoCk

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2020
1,833
9,174
Private forum, private rules. 1st amendment works in public/govt ruled places, this isn't. A mod/admin can delete/mod/ban you on a whim for anything and everything, and it'd be legal for them to do so : they own the place, they make the rules
Partly true.
Private rules (House right) can be implemented to a certain limit... (facebook, youtube etc can't do everything they want)
Already experienced multiple times that f95zone is open for critics, complains & negative/positive reviews.
Which is awesome cause this means this site is for diversity of opinions.
 

ZenGarden

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2017
1,696
3,217
Partly true.
Private rules (House right) can be implemented to a certain limit... (facebook, youtube etc can't do everything they want)
Already experienced multiple times that f95zone is open for critics, complains & negative/positive reviews.
Which is awesome cause this means this site is for diversity of opinions.
Actually, not true at all:
" Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "
"Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech" merely means there can be no Federal statute stopping you from saying whatever you want, whenever you want, except for Libel/Slander, Incitement, Prurience and Invasion of Privacy (per later Supreme Court rulings). It says NOTHING about there being private OR public consequences for your statements.
If F95 wants to ban this comment as off-topic, or any post of their choosing for any reason whatsoever, that's totally their right.
</rant>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gamesman01

401Grem

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2017
1,793
1,571
Actually, not true at all:
" Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "
"Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech" merely means there can be no Federal statute stopping you from saying whatever you want, whenever you want, except for Libel/Slander, Incitement, Prurience and Invasion of Privacy (per later Supreme Court rulings). It says NOTHING about there being private OR public consequences for your statements.
If F95 wants to ban this comment as off-topic, or any post of their choosing for any reason whatsoever, that's totally their right.
</rant>
It also says nothing about states, cities, or municipalities, least of all private properties, restricting speech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PePeTheCoCk

ZenGarden

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2017
1,696
3,217
It also says nothing about states, cities, or municipalities, least of all private properties, restricting speech.
Any state, city, municipality, county, parish or (whatever those divisions in Alaska are) law that restricts speech or assembly, or imposes a religion, would be struck down as unconstitutional, so it technically does.

My point is the government can't stop you from saying anything, but private rules can, and are subject to their own conditions, bylaws and penalties.
 

401Grem

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2017
1,793
1,571
Any state, city, municipality, county, parish or (whatever those divisions in Alaska are) law that restricts speech or assembly, or imposes a religion, would be struck down as unconstitutional, so it technically does.

My point is the government can't stop you from saying anything, but private rules can, and are subject to their own conditions, bylaws and penalties.
I agree fully, just saying that the constitution only specifically restricts congress
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZenGarden

Swinglow

Newbie
May 18, 2020
49
101
Got a whole family of girls preggers at the same time.
One of them having maybe the most wholesome storyline in the game.
Forcing her family members to lie to her.
hospital, labor, birth, same time.
I am dirt.

....10/10 would breed again.
 
4.00 star(s) 366 Votes