I read your post, your post was wrong and a mess of incoherent nonsense, so I made a general, simple response to what little of it wasn't inane babbling.are you trying to be objectively upsetting or are you not aware of what i said that you just ignored? Your first sentence was what I just hit on and second about what I just said about what will happen is a round about way of how YES if the work is worth it can or wont suffer. People who get paid more are more likely to improve quality so don't lie you cant discount motivation ok. Then you throw hypotheticals like 300 people who may or may not do more work in different time. Your right BUT only as much as you think so yes I guess if you look at what some games on here can do then I suppose naivety is what drives me to fix what you are trying put out as half truth. So before you reply to me again i suggest you think really hard about what I said and stop "arguing agreeing" about how I just laid out a more reasonable thing to do when a dev doesn't make you happy ok? I know how people think making his work about money is just a narrative to bash him and I think that is wrong and in some cases justified based on other works that were here just as long his( DC) and never completed. harem is a prime example the rpgm game which seems to be abandoned and that had earned way less than DC. some games on here you can compare and all of which vary even if they earn less or more. so based on what i said some are happy about what they are making and some not look em up dont use money as a go to argument.