johndoe19
Member
- May 31, 2019
- 256
- 504
- 308
1) I didn't want to assume if that was a statement or an opinion on your part. However, you have now clarified and just like before, you are entitled to your opinion whether i agree or not.1)Yea, that's clearly an opinion, and I wouldn't posit it as anything else. Describing something as great, i.e., "Sushi is great" can usually be inferred to be an opinion.
2)Thanks for recognizing that opinions differ on this point. You posited the situation as "Imagine if..." so I answered in kind.
3)Inferring the descriptor of "small peepee" to be not literal, but reinforcing symbolism for "insecure" is a natural step, just as 'small-hearted' or 'pusillanimous' can be inferred to not literally be representations of the size of one's heart or whatever one considers to be a soul. I'm not sure where you're inferring insecurity on my part.
Sorry if you feel I impose self-insertion on you, but you do seem to imply that you do so with your hypothetical pregnant mother situation. I don't know what creators expect of me when consuming their work, and I understand that many consumers choose to self-insert and have no problem with that. I'm not sure how not wanting to self-insert into a work of fiction in which horrific violence is occurring is "stupid". I'm merely asking people who choose to self-insert into works of fiction or depictions of fictional scenarios not to do so, and imagine it from that perspective, same as you ask people to imagine their mothers in a pregnancy porn film.
I'm not putting this on you, and sorry if it seems like I do, but many people who post on here about disliking or hating fetishes like NTR, BDSM, sharing, MM group sex, do so extremely emotionally and while belittling people who like or aren't bothered by those fetishes. Interpreting that as insecurity is not belittling but merely interpreting an emotional response as insecurity, like a guy who spends time talking about how tough he is and how inadequate he perceives other men to be.
3) You seem to be more comfortable than i in making assumptions when interpreting something, which is fine. When someone says something and there is multiple interpretations, I tend to go with the safest one and that is usually the most literal one. But either way, i do see how it could not be so literal and me saying i have a big peepee was more of a joke to mix in with my disagreement.
I impose self insertion on my self if anything, so no apology needed. To clarify, I am not saying that not inserting yourself into those works of fiction is stupid. But you said self inserting into those genres of work would be a nightmare so why do it. While i understand, i disagree at the same time. for me, relating to the protagonist of a action movie makes me enjoy it more, or for the horror movie makes me more scared. Being able to relate and put yourself in the shoes of the characters makes a story more enjoyable or engrossing to a lot of people. But vice verse, it can also ruin a story as well if they don't like the content, ntr for example. Asking a person who enjoys things that way to not do so, is no trivial thing like you try to put it. I think a takeaway from that is that people enjoy things in different ways and to respect that.
I actually agree with your last paragraph almost if not completely. But you must admit, just as there are people that will demean you for liking ntr, there are people who will do the same for not liking it. As for me, I dislike ntr myself and avoid it whenever I can in these games. But I also understand it is a fetish and even though it is not for me, other people still enjoy it. The only time i myself will belittle someone who likes ntr is when they do what you yourself dislike, otherwise i remain respectful.
Last edited:
