The correct answer is - payment system. There are differences between patreon's and subscriber's partners. Steam is more convenient in terms of payment.
Yup, you named it FROM YOUR HEAD. Thats not rules, thats YOU UNDERSTANDING of them. Or my. Ore someone elses. See any difference? We can disbilieve some creators claims, BUT their rules IS in fact ambiguous where they should be crystal clear with dozens of examples(coz its their income).
And whats more - several days ago those clowns changed their rules again. This time its about consent. Now all those imaginary characters must consent before going further. So - yes, that patreclowns is indeed decided to shoot their dick off.
Again, they aren't going to get any $$$ from Steam until after they rework the game and IF it gets approved by Steam. That means ZERO income until the possibility. They could start up a Subscribestar and start getting income thereafter WHILE working on the Steam rework. I know exactly what I'm saying, they can get payment near immediately on Subscribestar and may never get anything on Steam, and even if they did - it will take many months (more likely over a year or more) before that possibility even exists on Steam.
That's not hard to understand or figure out.
Two,
off the top of my head is a phrase that means that the facts are easy to see and it is obvious to anyone who takes a moment to consider.
Patreon's guidelines are not as ambiguous as some fans and creators seem to believe. They perceive them as ambiguous because they are guidelines they wish didn't exist, in most cases. You can make excuses, but you are only betraying your own intent and not the intent of the rules that are put forth. I am not saying they aren't written for some interpretation - because, yes, yes they are - that's what guidelines are for, to give a little leeway for content which might otherwise be not allowed outright for consideration for retention due to artistic intent, etc.
Uberpie knew incest was off the table, he'd already been reviewed, reprimanded and had to rework the game in the first few months of initial development. And yet, he drops an image in the game with has a mother seducing her son through a snap.
Uberpie knew bestiality was off the table, and is why there was no content with Max (and maybe the horse?). And yet, he attempted to push the boundaries with Max getting hot under Mary and Tiffany's dresses in the kitchen in one of the recent updates. While not direct bestiality, the implication was made and it was for the glorification and sexualization of those scenes, which Patreon states right up front they consider with all content they review.
Patreon DID NOT recently change their rules about consent. That rule has been in place since at least 2018. It's the reason why an even more popular game removed sleepsex from one scene back around 2018, because it was against Patreon policy.
Uberpie knew that nonconsensual sex was off the table, but has mind control with Mary and outright rape of Clara in the game - both prime examples of what Patreon does not allow unless there is some context in which it makes it allowed -that's the leeway I'm talking about. However, for sexual gratification, it is not allowed.
I could go on, but as you can see, Uberpie poked the bear and the bear poked back.
Please, don't try to blame me for situations that may or may not happen in your head. Or are you trying to change subject and blame someone else for patreon's inadequate actions?
From what I see, they decide to start another cleaning crusade for some reason. Any formal reasons will be created on the run.
Oh
My
God
Yeah, I'm done. Feel free to get the last word.
