>I take it you're the type of guy who looks at a painting and thinks "Why isn't this a photo instead?".
i like drawings with cute faces and as natural as possible forms (examples: paprika trainer, wizards adventures, what a legend ...disney fem art is also fine with me. bone manor more or less worked . )
>The artstyle looks great
okeish overall. but there are some issues
1st issue is that chars bodies looks ok (or so) excluding sex scenes when things got too ridiculous (at least for mom, clara, becca) yet again i wonder if there was a need for such inconsistency.
2nd issue - surprisingly two male chars are drawn good (like detailed facial features, nothing particularly weird, black dude almost trace-artish), couple of gials (redish schoolgial, and shop one - quite alright, but almost no content)...but most fem chars i dont find appealing enough (so from okeish to tolerable.)
>clearly a lot of people like it.
hard to measure (question could be - how many dont. or have mixed or unidentified feelings. but that math should be of use only for dev) for me it was more like leftover sandbox . im overall ok with it, but those scenes kinda ruined a piece of sandbox experience as lewd scenes are usually rewards upon quest completion and that sort of monstergial art is not rewarding at all.
>Exaggerations add character to a drawing.
no idea how.