- Dec 16, 2018
- 146
- 196
Version 3.27.1 and still no cute shopkeeper content, SMH.
Hmmm was curious about the goblin POV facial, and the cock presentation was nice, and the depth of field was cool! but there was no facial, the animation went to the goblins ass? for some reason, then continued all the text explaining the oral and facial while still showing the goblins ass... not sure if that was a glitch or not.You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
(Click the pic to see the gif)
Hayo! New weekly!
This time we've got the Goblin POV/Facial animation, which took some figuring out for the depth of field effect, but now we've got a good approach for it.
Sorry for the small update - I'm working on a huge new encounter featuring multiple characters (the last survey winner, for those wondering), which the editor is being very helpful for, but there's just too much to finish for it (had a pretty rough week) and I'd rather not break it up.
Next up we have that encounter, the first Evoker art, as well as improvements to the Spanking stance.
As always, changelog is below, and convenience download links below that. Support Majalis onYou must be registered to see the links!
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Java [.jar]
MEGA -You must be registered to see the links- Pixeldrain - Workupload
Android [.apk]
MEGA -You must be registered to see the links- Pixeldrain - Workupload
working on it, improving it and adding content is milkin it these days? Damn, so many milk devs around.i hate how much they milk this game they could finish this and start working on a new title
Why is the spanking stance needing so much attention? Frankly I think we're overdue for a full fleshing out of the stance system. Actually having stances come into play, rather than just being for show.You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
(Click the pic to see the gif)
Hayo! New weekly!
This time we've got the Goblin POV/Facial animation, which took some figuring out for the depth of field effect, but now we've got a good approach for it.
Sorry for the small update - I'm working on a huge new encounter featuring multiple characters (the last survey winner, for those wondering), which the editor is being very helpful for, but there's just too much to finish for it (had a pretty rough week) and I'd rather not break it up.
Next up we have that encounter, the first Evoker art, as well as improvements to the Spanking stance.
As always, changelog is below, and convenience download links below that. Support Majalis onYou must be registered to see the links!
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Java [.jar]
MEGA -You must be registered to see the links- Pixeldrain - Workupload
Android [.apk]
MEGA -You must be registered to see the links- Pixeldrain - Workupload
I get your pain. Sometimes you need a cute innocent girl to balance out all of the debauchery.Version 3.27.1 and still no cute shopkeeper content, SMH.
What would that entail, exactly? We're planning to have the Spanking stance having Embarrassment and redden the character's cheeks, which will have effects during sex stances and combat stances.Why is the spanking stance needing so much attention? Frankly I think we're overdue for a full fleshing out of the stance system. Actually having stances come into play, rather than just being for show.
That probably means there's a whole lot of dialogue for this stance that is unused (made for other characters that will spank you), and the stance itself has zero gameplay weight, you just tap the button and spank them. But you have plans for it for some reason.What would that entail, exactly? We're planning to have the Spanking stance having Embarrassment and redden the character's cheeks, which will have effects during sex stances and combat stances.
The reason I am improving it is that it is currently underbaked. Pointing to it being underbaked as a reason not to improve it is completely illogical. Part of the improvement is having enemies use it on you more frequently and taking advantage of the gameplay effects we are adding as part of this enhancement.That probably means there's a whole lot of dialogue for this stance that is unused (made for other characters that will spank you), and the stance itself has zero gameplay weight, you just tap the button and spank them. But you have plans for it for some reason.
Everyone probably skips this stance and goes for Make Out because it has some use. And enemies never use it on you, they hardly ever start Full Nelson, unless you are fighting for very long. And when they do, they have plans other than spanking.
Okay. You asked “why could adding mechanics to spanking seems strange”, I tried to describe why.The reason I am improving it is that it is currently underbaked. Pointing to it being underbaked as a reason...
+++Version 3.27.1 and still no cute shopkeeper content, SMH.
The bigger surprise secret would be she's committing tax fraud.+++
If you could get caught on stealing in General store, then she would ask you to offer your mouth and ass as compensation, the world could be a better place.
I "Absolutely love" how much some of these people bring up " Provide constructive criticism" when at the end of the day that's just a "fine" opinion too so that can also go in the rubbish bin.I "love" how much these people voice their "fine" opinions instead of "providing their constructive criticism" to the designated receptable for it, as in the trashbin.
pretty sure the second vampire gal only does that. but apart from her and goblin i don't remember tbh. i think there is one more. two tops but prolly only one more. cant remember who it was tho... if at allDoes anyone know if any enemies other than the goblin are able to use the seduction skill/stance, and/or present/kneel when horny?
The power of exhausting Hiro through Hand Jobs is an ancient secret that the Enemies need to learn.pretty sure the second vampire gal only does that. but apart from her and goblin i don't remember tbh. i think there is one more. two tops but prolly only one more. cant remember who it was tho... if at all