treetoto

Member
Jul 29, 2017
189
170
The art is garbage, but the concept is pretty neat. It needs more options and content for people who aren't bottoms, but I'm sure that will be fixed as the game is finished. And it could do with an option for changing the dick size of enemies, because WEW LAD.
I make of point of trying to understand people from both sides of an argument. That being said could you list so other artist who draw shemales/futanari so that we can have a point of reference.

because at this point its like you are saying (your favorite) 'restaurant' is trash and then leaving. and if you added that you were comparing it to (i don't know; Gordon Ramsey approved) '5 star restaurant' we could understand your view of things.

That being said futa-on-male games is hard enough to find as it is and comparatively *cough* sex and fantasy and Hard Love *cough* is (imo) way worst looking than this game
 

mr_tao

Member
Apr 21, 2019
371
366
eh, I wouldn't bother much: it's just a matter of personal taste and Majalis's style IS peculiar enough.

(I also personally dislike how they keep the character way too clothed and without enough naked tits even though I generally like their style)
 

TheIronclad

New Member
Mar 1, 2020
6
16
I make of point of trying to understand people from both sides of an argument. That being said could you list so other artist who draw shemales/futanari so that we can have a point of reference.

because at this point its like you are saying (your favorite) 'restaurant' is trash and then leaving. and if you added that you were comparing it to (i don't know; Gordon Ramsey approved) '5 star restaurant' we could understand your view of things.

That being said futa-on-male games is hard enough to find as it is and comparatively *cough* sex and fantasy and Hard Love *cough* is (imo) way worst looking than this game
Why do they have to be shemale/futanari artists? Art quality isn't tied to content, but I see what you're getting at. The art is sloppy and bulbous looking. My boyfriend sent me a pic from the game, and I legitimately thought it was scat porn because of how grody the penis looked. I don't really follow many shemale/futanari artists, but I follow plenty of gay porn artists, for example;
  • Melanpsycholia
  • SteamedEggZ
  • 2n5 (Though they draw shemales as well as males.)
These are artists whom I consider to have better art than Majalis.
 

taglag

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2019
1,304
1,070
I give this nice trolling attempt 5/7
I agree a troll, trying to stir up a ridiculous brander so they can laugh at how they manipulated the topic.

I find the art almost perfect in the Anime style of Girly boy look.

Which in that genre I have always seen the Anime Girlyboy as one hundred percent girl, except for having a mostly small, and useless penis. Not a vivisected and silicone enhanced creation, but a natural event that formed a young person into an Androgynous individual.

A unique game that so many troll's just love to invade.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheIronclad

smegmaboyo

Member
Apr 16, 2019
132
245
I agree a troll, trying to stir up a ridiculous brander so they can laugh at how they manipulated the topic.
[...]
A unique game that so many troll's just love to invade.
I like the art but I fail to see how "I like XYZ about the game but ABC is shit." is a troll opinion. Frankly I'll take this over "bro am I gay for jacking off to Hiro" any day.
 

TheIronclad

New Member
Mar 1, 2020
6
16
I agree a troll, trying to stir up a ridiculous brander so they can laugh at how they manipulated the topic.

I find the art almost perfect in the Anime style of Girly boy look.

Which in that genre I have always seen the Anime Girlyboy as one hundred percent girl, except for having a mostly small, and useless penis. Not a vivisected and silicone enhanced creation, but a natural event that formed a young person into an Androgynous individual.

A unique game that so many troll's just love to invade.
I'm a "troll" because I have different opinions?

Okay, buddy.

The art is a far cry from the worst I've seen, but it is by no means "perfect."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Assblasta9k

treetoto

Member
Jul 29, 2017
189
170
agreed, he might have come out a little strong, but he did voice a perfectly valid opinion: he doesn't like the art-style.
I agree that Majalis work is more bubble-ly and way out of proportion characters (while I don't understand how you pictured scat from one of the images), however thats just a stylize way of creating sexy character where (i guess currently) thicc is king.

For references check: , & , , , and so on...

looking at the artists(latest 10 images maybe) you've provided, wouldn't you just be more favorable to art with more normal(realistic) characteristics.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

For those at home the current argument is; opponent says Majalis art is bad because the proportions are skewed and bulbous-ie, and one of the in-game dick images he saw looked sorta turd like(probably Urka or Selkie, if i had to guess).

Counter argument: Porn is weird as it always has been, 'thicc is king' is still popular, and this will probably end with both sides disagreeing because art (especially) doesn't cater to everyone and everyone can have there own opinions.

Also if you find something with an aggressive trap(josuo seme) I'd would love a link to it cause that is way rarer that futa stuff.
 

Dexter1927

Member
Aug 7, 2019
155
238
Counter argument: Porn is weird as it always has been, 'thicc is king' is still popular, and this will probably end with both sides disagreeing because art (especially) doesn't cater to everyone and everyone can have there own opinions.
That moment when you gatekeep art for the sake of human proportion even if you are in a fantasy world... i mean you can love or hate something, vanilla icecream is not shit just because you don't like it, and pineapple on pizza is still pizza even if i would burn your house to the ground if you like it, i just don't care and live my life better like this

He literally came in broke the rules, why justify it with 2 pages of replies? troll or not just ignore it and move on.

On another note any news from JohnDupont about a guide update?
We are the whiteknight of Alis and we will fight till the neckbeard army is totally defeated, like the dog fight for the hand who feeds him xD even if the feed is a porngame i guess?

And no no updates so far, feels like he totally forgot about it
 
  • Like
Reactions: cumboy

Fuzzcat

Active Member
Oct 27, 2017
624
664
The art is a far cry from the worst I've seen, but it is by no means "perfect."
So then, it's not "garbage" ;)

Now, stepping aside the booing-crow, and the trollish-crying accusattions and/or whiteknighting... you're not that [/] wrong.

The art is not grabage, no, but it is great neither.
But, like the previously mentioned Adjatha, it does his job.
Have in mind, half trap-stuff fans like skinny, loli-like traps. The other half like soft, feminine traps. Those are who this game aims.
This game is not a generic "build your character", in which you can RP your way in (and out. Or both!). It's mostly focused in a specific line/path, and if tehre's some dom content and customization, it's because fans (read donors) asked for it.

Aside of personal tastes, you might be accustomed to more "solid" characters, if you tend to look more gay content. Alis characters are notoriously soft and round, it's basically his personal brand. Even Urka, who I guess to be strong and though, looks soft.

But, following your critics... Alis draws soft, round characters, because, as hard it might sound to say, she can't draw muscled or "solid" characters, she's simply not good at it. Just do a google search for old art, and you'll see that her artworks focuses mostly in soft and chubbyness, and whenever there's something remotely masculine, it is a mess (at which point, yes, I do agree that it can be considered "garbage").
So, why try to do something she's not good, and might not even like or interest her, when she's good at what she likes, and gets them (as Maj-Alis team) a good, faithful fanbase?

But yeah, aside -again- of personal tastes like chubbyness or roundness, some things are simply bad. Like really bad.
I just can't understand how after all this time, there's not a single hand drawn correctly. Most are missing thumbs, or have the wrong angle and look like they're broken at the wrist.
The chubby cocks? Well, that's nothing wrong, they do exist, but I agree that there could be some more variety (in shapes and looks). I think the only different one (that is not a beast cock) is the Harpy one, the rest are all the same (and I've said it before, the description doesn't seems to match the art, and neither the technical description. I dunno, Selkie for example, seems to have a massive baby-arm dick, but the tech description is merely an average 8 inch cock or so.).
I avoid the centaur encounter, because I can't stand the friggin mess of picture. Everything is completely wrong there, and I'm not talking about bestiality.

But again, is not really a matter of being perfect artwork, because there's no such thing.
It does his job, since we want mostly cute, feminine characters, and she's really good at it, just like Adjatha is a terrible artist (like, REALLY bad, and he/she is highly praised), but does a good job of giving fans a big load of tits and asses.
 

Geralt_of_Trivia

Active Member
Jan 27, 2019
829
2,183
So then, it's not "garbage" ;)

Now, stepping aside the booing-crow, and the trollish-crying accusattions and/or whiteknighting... you're not that [/] wrong.

The art is not grabage, no, but it is great neither.
But, like the previously mentioned Adjatha, it does his job.
Have in mind, half trap-stuff fans like skinny, loli-like traps. The other half like soft, feminine traps. Those are who this game aims.
This game is not a generic "build your character", in which you can RP your way in (and out. Or both!). It's mostly focused in a specific line/path, and if tehre's some dom content and customization, it's because fans (read donors) asked for it.

Aside of personal tastes, you might be accustomed to more "solid" characters, if you tend to look more gay content. Alis characters are notoriously soft and round, it's basically his personal brand. Even Urka, who I guess to be strong and though, looks soft.

But, following your critics... Alis draws soft, round characters, because, as hard it might sound to say, she can't draw muscled or "solid" characters, she's simply not good at it. Just do a google search for old art, and you'll see that her artworks focuses mostly in soft and chubbyness, and whenever there's something remotely masculine, it is a mess (at which point, yes, I do agree that it can be considered "garbage").
So, why try to do something she's not good, and might not even like or interest her, when she's good at what she likes, and gets them (as Maj-Alis team) a good, faithful fanbase?

But yeah, aside -again- of personal tastes like chubbyness or roundness, some things are simply bad. Like really bad.
I just can't understand how after all this time, there's not a single hand drawn correctly. Most are missing thumbs, or have the wrong angle and look like they're broken at the wrist.
The chubby cocks? Well, that's nothing wrong, they do exist, but I agree that there could be some more variety (in shapes and looks). I think the only different one (that is not a beast cock) is the Harpy one, the rest are all the same (and I've said it before, the description doesn't seems to match the art, and neither the technical description. I dunno, Selkie for example, seems to have a massive baby-arm dick, but the tech description is merely an average 8 inch cock or so.).
I avoid the centaur encounter, because I can't stand the friggin mess of picture. Everything is completely wrong there, and I'm not talking about bestiality.

But again, is not really a matter of being perfect artwork, because there's no such thing.
It does his job, since we want mostly cute, feminine characters, and she's really good at it, just like Adjatha is a terrible artist (like, REALLY bad, and he/she is highly praised), but does a good job of giving fans a big load of tits and asses.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

TLD: your opinion is valid, but your critique seems to be based on a misconception and thus seems unfair and/or misinformed
 

mickjag

Newbie
Jul 24, 2019
52
90
So I had about year long hiatus from this game. Is there a lot of new stuff or should I just wait another few months before trying it again?
I know there's a lot of new art but how about story progression?
 

mr_tao

Member
Apr 21, 2019
371
366
So I had about year long hiatus from this game. Is there a lot of new stuff or should I just wait another few months before trying it again?
I know there's a lot of new art but how about story progression?
story-mode did progress a little

character events in free running mode have expanded massively
 
  • Like
Reactions: mickjag

Fuzzcat

Active Member
Oct 27, 2017
624
664
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

TLD: your opinion is valid, but your critique seems to be based on a misconception and thus seems unfair and/or misinformed
Let's keep it within "spoiler" hush-hush, because some people thinks that the only think worth talking about ToA is just sharing links. *roll eyes*

Anyways:

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

TLD: your opinion is valid, but your critique seems to be based on a misconception and thus seems unfair and/or misinformed

Well... considering I was very specific, that I only mentioned facts and point-on critics (with a constructive approach), that I never talked about style or what she likes to do or what I'd like to see, that your artistic knowledge (and comparisons) are wrong and totally off comparison (basically, unfair)... seems like it is you who are misunderstanding, starting from what you read and interpreted of what I've said, going thru your lack of knowledge, which leads to a completely wrong in every point opinion you did (since there's not a single fact)... basically, a misinformed reply. *shrug*
 
4.40 star(s) 155 Votes