EDIT >>> The biggest thing to me was how they complained about basically everything in the game, and then threw out some bogus rating of 4 out of 5.. Like we would even care...LOL
Ratings are getting more and more "bogussy" lately.
Low rating because X didn't liked how the dev replied to someone else, or high ratings because Y found his best friend playing and they fapped thogether. Some mediocre games gets all good ratings just because the dev is well know, while games with potential are immediately crucifyed because the dev is absolutely unknown.
When doing a rating, it should be a balance of logic between being absolutely objective, and personal taste.
Now, back to drama...
He wasn't really being offensive.
Sure, he played only one aspect of the game and missed a lot, but didn't say anything wrong.
There's "futa" in ToA? No, not really, he's right (sure, the "futa" term has been generalized lately, that's why he brings the issue)
There's dom actions? Not that many. (sure, it has been asked a lot. But evidently this is his first approach to the game, how's he's going to know?)
Is there any hint in the title or the presentation, about what is exactly the approach (mostly sub)? Nope. (sure, it says "androgyny" in the title, which might mean anything)
He just made his opinions, which anyone can do. Of course, opinions based on a limited way of view, but still valid.
And then he made a review, which is kinda rushed on, considering what he actually played. But still seemed to enjoy the game, and kept somewhat objective.
C'mon.
Just let's point him in the right direction if needed, and be patient!