- Oct 27, 2017
- 624
- 664
Why not?
Considering he'd like more dom options, he probably likes butt stuffing on others.
Maybe he got attracted by the artwork, like most do.
Maybe he likes dickgirls, because he prefers feminine looks (gynephilia).
Searching for tags also might had lead him here. None of the tags is "almost submissive content" or "butt-stuffed yourself".
If not because we already know the game for quite some time, the name and tags could match most other games with anal-dickgirls-monstergirls-rpg-male protagonist.
It just happens that ToA works contrary to 90% other games out there: instead of putting your dick into NPCs, slaves, enemies, monsters, your family, your mount, a flowerpot and/or your backpack, things get to be the inverse.
There's no real way of telling just by the header and preview pics.
So, let's say you like big butts, feminine looks, and if there are going to be cocks around, better if girls have them.
Well, you see the header and you're sold.
Nothing says "you're going to be target of the amorous affections"
Hum...I didn't see it as "negative or biased".
Negative and biased would have been "I didn't liked this or that, because everyone is gay and I don't like gay".
Usually, negative AND biased also means being wrong and /or judgemental.
The only wrong thing he got was considering some portions incomplete, because he saw them from just one side. Which weren't wrong in a sense, just...incomplete.
The guy simply described what he found, and what would like as option.
If anything, he just wanted more options, without having seen what's already there.
sheesh, another wall-text... wtf is wrong with me?
