- Jun 10, 2017
- 11,060
- 16,448
Absolutely not. They, sometime, debate over the definition of "country of origin" as stated by the Bern Convention, because the said definition is outdated. It wasn't updated with the rise of internet, and now there's ambiguity because a site can be physically located in more than one country, while the owner be in yet another one. But that's all lawyers debate about.[...] that's something lawyers and men of law still debate over.
Everything is clear since the 70's (if my memory don't betray me) and both the establishment of the Bern Convention and adjustment of countries laws to take count of it. Even the definition of fair use isn't subject to debate. It can't goes over the main rights of the owner, and making money with the creation of someone else goes over them.