I m starting to suspect that they meant ai cg = shit.
- Jan 3, 2021
- 1,151
- 3,755
Nope. We have machinma. We have cheap and mostly free access to easy 3D models. Nobody needs to be a good illustrator to generate images. Failing that, text adventures are still a thing and still an option. If someone is cool with choosing the artistically bereft option of cutting corners with AI, I'm going to assume they cut other corners as well (stole code, plagiarized writing, etc.). Basically anybody worth their artistic salt will put in the actual work; everyone else is a grifter.
- May 12, 2020
- 167
- 107
Very missleading to have another location to unlock only to find that it's either locked behind a paywall or part of the next release but then why bother even saying that a 3rd option is WIP?? I feel scammed not to mention the fact that it's AI (which I don't mind most of the time as a image generation tool but as the only artistic option kinda sucks)
- Oct 11, 2023
- 188
- 529
A lot of people prefer 2d art. Also didn't you prove my point that we need better stories and better gameplay
- Jan 6, 2019
- 6
- 7
Look when I'm enjoying a porn game, it's mostly played with one hand, and my executive functions are pretty limited. This game actually combines a simple, yet dopamine hacking mechanic and combines with some very enjoyable art.
By having animated facial expression by hand I assume, this developer solves a big issue of static / ai-generated art. The lifeless-ness. Having an inherent cheat menu thorugh using an autoclicker program, is also nice.
Although unlocking stuff in the game really isn't too bad, and the male orgasm bar, prevents you from getting athritis basically.
By having animated facial expression by hand I assume, this developer solves a big issue of static / ai-generated art. The lifeless-ness. Having an inherent cheat menu thorugh using an autoclicker program, is also nice.
Although unlocking stuff in the game really isn't too bad, and the male orgasm bar, prevents you from getting athritis basically.
Last edited:
- Jan 3, 2021
- 1,151
- 3,755
How? Who cares what other people prefer? If your goal is to explicitly please an audience and not yourself, you've already failed as a creative. Not that you can't also enjoy what you make, but if profit is your driving factor rather than genuine enjoyment or a personal drive to tell your story or share your craft? You're already fucked. If you really care that much, you'll make your own art (even if it's 'bad', it is still yours, and communicates something about you are a creator), or hire actual people to make actual art. Pawning it off to an incontrollable black-box randomizer fueled by global art-theft because it is the 'easy' option is what complete hacks do. Not real creatives. Not anyone who actually gives enough of an actual fuck to put in the time, effort, and energy to make anything else worthwhile.
99.99% of the games we see here on F95 using generative AI are low-effort slop, created by people looking to skim revenue off of horney dipshits for as little work as possible. They often copy the style of other artists, sometimes even making cheap imitations of whole other games (pretty sure there are at least 2 cheap AI copies of Summertime Saga currently floating around). Anyone grifting with generative AI simply doesn't have the creative wherewithal to be busting out this superior 'gameplay' or 'story' you're looking for. Why would they? Generative AI is the path of least resistance. Hell, how many of them have AI generated scripts that are AI translated into multiple different languages for their first release? Quite a few.
If you think that hacks using generative AI actually care about the end product, I have a sunken bridge in Florida to sell you...
It's porn. Nobody cares about artistic nonsense, creative effort or whatever people mad at AI seethe about, save for said grifters who want to make art for living and are cucked by AI since in the end it doesn't really matter to the average person. In good hands AI has potential like any other tool, be it DAZ or whatever. AI just lowers the bar of entry so any dumbass can make a "game" or whatever else medium. While "ai cg" tagged games should always be taken with a grain of salt, they shouldn't be dismissed entirely, as some can be pretty decent, and it's not 99.99% bad like you say. As for the revenue, check your address bar lmao
Got a fairly genuine malware-warning when trying to launch this game. Beware!
I have no idea how to play this game. Genuinely. Am i supposed to tap? You Lost? What am i supposed to do?
- Nov 1, 2020
- 855
- 660
Maybe there is one on that dr Murph game and they accidentaly did this in the first place. I played this game. For one luckily there is no scat. i am not a fan. It also does defently not fit in this game.
- Jan 3, 2021
- 1,151
- 3,755
Good god, you call actual artists grifters, use 'cuck' as a pejorative, all while defending generative AI as a 'tool'. I bet you vote Republican. Can I also interest you in a submerged bridge in Florida?
When you ovrclick you "cum" and lose restarting the level with upgrades maintained. you can buy pills or injections to stop the "cum meter" from overfilling.
i think the guys fighting over AI cg are missing the point. I m more bothered by the fact that the only full line of text in the game is:"please support etc etc ." AIcg being a tool supporting an idea, writing or effort is fine by me but AI cg being the whole thing bothers me.
See, I don't hate the idea of AI in itself, but AI has only just started to become useable in games and what not. The ones trying to use it now are clearly cash grabbing, the smart ones are bidding their time. Give it a year or even two and I guarantee you won't be able to tell the difference at all and that's when we're going to start seeing alot more polished games that you won't care were created with AI because the story, art, and etc will be good enough to disregard it.