CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

1Teddy1

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2018
1,316
2,218
And simply making suggestions + saying they don't have to do it for the game to be enjoyable anyway is a problem?
Telling the Dev to make the game less enjoyable by removing the main reason(seeing the MC's love interest get cucked from him by alpha Futas) some people are even playing the game is a problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crazyhorsebraz

Orphanus

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2019
1,239
1,985
Telling the Dev to make the game less enjoyable by removing the main reason(seeing the MC's love interest get cucked from him by alpha Futas) some people are even playing the game is a problem.
You understood that I said it could be an option, not that it should be done in general, I even said previously I don't wish for changes that take anything away from the people loving the NTR part?
 

ldahl

Newbie
Aug 24, 2022
27
59
Torian alluded to the futas having a different plan for the MC than for the GF being the root of the different treatment. I think it feels more jarring when you're female MC right now as you can't chalk it up to gender, but that's apparently not supposed to be the reason. I guess this sort of thing is going to happen when playing things WIP. We'll see where the story goes eventually.

Surely leaving the GF at home is the "no NTR pls" setting? I.e. equivalent to removing her from the game for that playthrough. I assumed this meant she wouldn't feature in the story at all and events would adapt accordingly. Is this being interpreted as a "let's leave her at home so I can have fun with the futas in peace" thing?

I think the customization options (MC gender and GF presence) seem manageable. The problems appear more to do with the game's early stage of development. Like you could play earlier versions just fine without the GF, the reason it's broken now is that an entirely new GF progression system was introduced for 0.35a without proper checks for her presence. We probably shouldn't read too much into bugs in these alphas in terms of judging (lack of) commitment to certain choices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orphanus

Orphanus

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2019
1,239
1,985
Torian alluded to the futas having a different plan for the MC than for the GF being the root of the different treatment. I think it feels more jarring when you're female MC right now as you can't chalk it up to gender, but that's apparently not supposed to be the reason. I guess this sort of thing is going to happen when playing things WIP. We'll see where the story goes eventually.

Surely leaving the GF at home is the "no NTR pls" setting? I.e. equivalent to removing her from the game for that playthrough. I assumed this meant she wouldn't feature in the story at all and events would adapt accordingly. Is this being interpreted as a "let's leave her at home so I can have fun with the futas in peace" thing?
Leaving the girlfriend at home is fine enough, if my suggestions came across as if I was demanding a change that is on me, but not my intention. All I am saying is that removing her would be a cleaner solution & I was trying to give examples for why I think it would be doable right now + also provide possible ways to adjust the dialogue without adding additional lines (cause that's more work to do for the Dev) but by cutting references to the GF.
My point is simply that just sending her home means there is cheating going on by the MC getting intimate with the other girls, but it's not as if the game was bringing it up in an aggressive manner, as I've said I am thankful the Dev even gives the option at all.

It's likely as you say though, there is a deeper reason for why they try to have both characters present, which is one thing, and the other is that of course the Dev could also just keep things as they are because it fits their vision of the game better than what e.g. me is suggesting and that would be fair as well, of course. Their game, their decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ldahl

ldahl

Newbie
Aug 24, 2022
27
59
Leaving the girlfriend at home is fine enough, if my suggestions came across as if I was demanding a change that is on me, but not my intention. All I am saying is that removing her would be a cleaner solution & I was trying to give examples for why I think it would be doable right now + also provide possible ways to adjust the dialogue without adding additional lines (cause that's more work to do for the Dev) but by cutting references to the GF.
My point is simply that just sending her home means there is cheating going on by the MC getting intimate with the other girls, but it's not as if the game was bringing it up in an aggressive manner, as I've said I am thankful the Dev even gives the option at all.

It's likely as you say though, there is a deeper reason for why they try to have both characters present, which is one thing, and the other is that of course the Dev could also just keep things as they are because it fits their vision of the game better than what e.g. me is suggesting and that would be fair as well, of course. Their game, their decision.
I didn't take it like that. There's a lot you have to read between the lines right now while the story is underdeveloped so I'm sure we're all under slightly different impressions.

Maybe the game should be asking if you have a GF rather than whether you bring her. :) Hard to say without picking the dev's mind. She could indeed still have a role to play, after all. I could certainly also see "being tempted to service/indulge with the futas" being an alternative line to walk instead of the NTR stuff, but hey who knows. We don't know very much about the main story line yet, so eh--just curious to see where Torian is going with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orphanus

Orphanus

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2019
1,239
1,985
I didn't take it like that. There's a lot you have to read between the lines right now while the story is underdeveloped so I'm sure we're all under slightly different impressions.

Maybe the game should be asking if you have a GF rather than whether you bring her. :) Hard to say without picking the dev's mind. She could indeed still have a role to play, after all. I could certainly also see "being tempted to service/indulge with the futas" being an alternative line to walk instead of the NTR stuff, but hey who knows. We don't know very much about the main story line yet, so eh--just curious to see where Torian is going with it.
Good to know, thanks, the exchange beforehand made me wonder if I unintentionally had been harshly negative about the game or something, which I'd be sorry for, cause it wasn't meant to make the Dev feel bad about their so far intriguing work.

Oh yeah there is definitely a good chance the Dev already has certain plans and very good reasons for why there is no choice if the MC has a GF to begin with, I'm writing under the assumption that the option to send her home is indeed meant as simply a "NTR yes/no" toggle and that might be wrong. But even if that is the case and the Dev does it that way because the aim is to make the game accessible to non NTR fans without creating any more additional work if not dead necessary that's ofc a good reason to do it as is.

And I agree, so far things have been kept vague and it's pretty hard to make a guess what everything is about, so my critique around the MC lacking a real personality and the female MC potentially just taking the GFs role simultaneously might be a bit foolish in the long-term.
 

Kohan54

Member
Dec 1, 2021
145
169
Torian alluded to the futas having a different plan for the MC than for the GF being the root of the different treatment. I think it feels more jarring when you're female MC right now as you can't chalk it up to gender, but that's apparently not supposed to be the reason. I guess this sort of thing is going to happen when playing things WIP. We'll see where the story goes eventually.

Surely leaving the GF at home is the "no NTR pls" setting? I.e. equivalent to removing her from the game for that playthrough. I assumed this meant she wouldn't feature in the story at all and events would adapt accordingly. Is this being interpreted as a "let's leave her at home so I can have fun with the futas in peace" thing?

I think the customization options (MC gender and GF presence) seem manageable. The problems appear more to do with the game's early stage of development. Like you could play earlier versions just fine without the GF, the reason it's broken now is that an entirely new GF progression system was introduced for 0.35a without proper checks for her presence. We probably shouldn't read too much into bugs in these alphas in terms of judging (lack of) commitment to certain choices.
Yeah we will see where the things lead when MC will get focus and we will touch on him / her doing girls personal stories.

The whole MC thing is technically in that state since both Male and Female are still in 0.1 we haven't move past that as you say it's work in progress.

Honestly some small scenes in future where our sex matters would be nice for example Tina first scene is getting a small rework so she will offer coffee randomly have her offer it for MC if we're playing Female for example.

Also, it's hence why I'm waiting for 0.4 Samantha or maybe even more I played 0.3 so much that I can wait to devour more content at once in future :) but even so I like some changes like for example relantioship of MC and Futas having impact so looking forward to it already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orphanus

ldahl

Newbie
Aug 24, 2022
27
59
Honestly some small scenes in future where our sex matters would be nice
I'm all for reactivity. As much as possible, really, for any factor that can put an interesting twist and "personalize" a scene. But I get that infinite variations is a lot of work. :p

Also, it's hence why I'm waiting for 0.4 Samantha or maybe even more I played 0.3 so much that I can wait to devour more content at once in future :)
Probably not a bad idea tbh. The Patreon contributor's scenes sneak peek looked good too IMHO, so if you hold off for a couple of versions there'll probably be a fair amount of new scenes in total, in addition to the new systems being ironed out.
 

Ruis0

Newbie
Nov 23, 2017
75
45
Is there a way to simply have both Mc and Gf both be happy sluts for their Futa 'friends with benefits'. Also a bit weird that they prefer the Gf over the female Mc like come on, female Mc should be easy mode and the Futas should hit on both of them almost equally. Also agree that some scenes could also be adapted for the female Mc using the Gf assets for more scenes with her, hope there are scenes with both the GF and FMC sharing a Futa, any of them...
 

Huurn

Member
Game Developer
Apr 7, 2023
266
640
This game is just too damn broken at this point. Loads of errors, some you can ignore, some you can't. A lot of scenes you can't see because they break the game. The progression seems broken too, there's a lot of content that I just can't get to in this version. Noone will fuck the gf no matter how long I play. The dialogue is also very inconsistent, the NPCs seem completely unaware of what they have done or said earlier. A shame, because there is a lot I like about this game, but right now it is just too frustrating to play.
 

Kohan54

Member
Dec 1, 2021
145
169
there's a lot of content that I just can't get to in this version. Noone will fuck the gf no matter how long I play
If you have too high relantioship with girls as MC even if GF hits 100 they won't fuck her because of your relantioship with them.

Dunno about threshold.

Just skip some days at work and don't use cheat to increase your relantioships.
 

Torian_Media

Member
Game Developer
Sep 7, 2021
102
287
So loads of comments on here :) 0.36 will be released today. 0.35a was always going to be buggy as it had a complete rework of the coding. I didn't publicly release as I knew it was going to be buggy, but wanted feedback on the new systems that were implemented. I have been taking on the feedback and there will be a lot of tweaks and bug fixes as well as a few new scenes
 

phupdup

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2019
1,391
1,105
Code:
While running game code:
  File "game/Player Room.rpy", line 938, in script call
    call OH_sex_unseen_roll
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 343, in script
    $ random_event = meanwhile_Darcy_events.get_event()
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 343, in <module>
    $ random_event = meanwhile_Darcy_events.get_event()
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 412, in get_event
    if event.requirements_met():
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 396, in requirements_met
    if not eval(requirement):
NameError: name 'OH_BJ' is not defined
I tried to chase this down but it's a randomly triggered event. Since I was thrown into the console with the traceback and the RNG is non-determinate (not seed based) the rollback gave me a different RNG result and thus no error.

---edit----

But wait.... there's more:

Code:
While running game code:
  File "game/Player Room.rpy", line 953, in script call
    call OH_sex_unseen_roll
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 337, in script
    $ random_event = meanwhile_Anita_events.get_event()
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 337, in <module>
    $ random_event = meanwhile_Anita_events.get_event()
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 412, in get_event
    if event.requirements_met():
  File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 396, in requirements_met
    if not eval(requirement):
NameError: name 'OH_kiss' is not defined
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torian_Media
3.50 star(s) 26 Votes