- Oct 13, 2016
- 70
- 221
I hope the dev doesn't listen to any of this.
Okay, fair enough, how would you like things to be done though?I hope the dev doesn't listen to any of this.
I'd like the dev to make the game they want to make.Okay, fair enough, how would you like things to be done though?
And simply making suggestions + saying they don't have to do it for the game to be enjoyable anyway is a problem?I'd like the dev to make the game they want to make.
Telling the Dev to make the game less enjoyable by removing the main reason(seeing the MC's love interest get cucked from him by alpha Futas) some people are even playing the game is a problem.And simply making suggestions + saying they don't have to do it for the game to be enjoyable anyway is a problem?
You understood that I said it could be an option, not that it should be done in general, I even said previously I don't wish for changes that take anything away from the people loving the NTR part?Telling the Dev to make the game less enjoyable by removing the main reason(seeing the MC's love interest get cucked from him by alpha Futas) some people are even playing the game is a problem.
It's not a "problem" to make suggestions, this is just bad advice, hence my suggestion that the dev ignore all of it.And simply making suggestions + saying they don't have to do it for the game to be enjoyable anyway is a problem?
Which is of course okay, I don't agree with it obviously but sure.It's not a "problem" to make suggestions, this is just bad advice, hence my suggestion that the dev ignore all of it.
Leaving the girlfriend at home is fine enough, if my suggestions came across as if I was demanding a change that is on me, but not my intention. All I am saying is that removing her would be a cleaner solution & I was trying to give examples for why I think it would be doable right now + also provide possible ways to adjust the dialogue without adding additional lines (cause that's more work to do for the Dev) but by cutting references to the GF.Torian alluded to the futas having a different plan for the MC than for the GF being the root of the different treatment. I think it feels more jarring when you're female MC right now as you can't chalk it up to gender, but that's apparently not supposed to be the reason. I guess this sort of thing is going to happen when playing things WIP. We'll see where the story goes eventually.
Surely leaving the GF at home is the "no NTR pls" setting? I.e. equivalent to removing her from the game for that playthrough. I assumed this meant she wouldn't feature in the story at all and events would adapt accordingly. Is this being interpreted as a "let's leave her at home so I can have fun with the futas in peace" thing?
I didn't take it like that. There's a lot you have to read between the lines right now while the story is underdeveloped so I'm sure we're all under slightly different impressions.Leaving the girlfriend at home is fine enough, if my suggestions came across as if I was demanding a change that is on me, but not my intention. All I am saying is that removing her would be a cleaner solution & I was trying to give examples for why I think it would be doable right now + also provide possible ways to adjust the dialogue without adding additional lines (cause that's more work to do for the Dev) but by cutting references to the GF.
My point is simply that just sending her home means there is cheating going on by the MC getting intimate with the other girls, but it's not as if the game was bringing it up in an aggressive manner, as I've said I am thankful the Dev even gives the option at all.
It's likely as you say though, there is a deeper reason for why they try to have both characters present, which is one thing, and the other is that of course the Dev could also just keep things as they are because it fits their vision of the game better than what e.g. me is suggesting and that would be fair as well, of course. Their game, their decision.
Good to know, thanks, the exchange beforehand made me wonder if I unintentionally had been harshly negative about the game or something, which I'd be sorry for, cause it wasn't meant to make the Dev feel bad about their so far intriguing work.I didn't take it like that. There's a lot you have to read between the lines right now while the story is underdeveloped so I'm sure we're all under slightly different impressions.
Maybe the game should be asking if you have a GF rather than whether you bring her. Hard to say without picking the dev's mind. She could indeed still have a role to play, after all. I could certainly also see "being tempted to service/indulge with the futas" being an alternative line to walk instead of the NTR stuff, but hey who knows. We don't know very much about the main story line yet, so eh--just curious to see where Torian is going with it.
Yeah we will see where the things lead when MC will get focus and we will touch on him / her doing girls personal stories.Torian alluded to the futas having a different plan for the MC than for the GF being the root of the different treatment. I think it feels more jarring when you're female MC right now as you can't chalk it up to gender, but that's apparently not supposed to be the reason. I guess this sort of thing is going to happen when playing things WIP. We'll see where the story goes eventually.
Surely leaving the GF at home is the "no NTR pls" setting? I.e. equivalent to removing her from the game for that playthrough. I assumed this meant she wouldn't feature in the story at all and events would adapt accordingly. Is this being interpreted as a "let's leave her at home so I can have fun with the futas in peace" thing?
I think the customization options (MC gender and GF presence) seem manageable. The problems appear more to do with the game's early stage of development. Like you could play earlier versions just fine without the GF, the reason it's broken now is that an entirely new GF progression system was introduced for 0.35a without proper checks for her presence. We probably shouldn't read too much into bugs in these alphas in terms of judging (lack of) commitment to certain choices.
I'm all for reactivity. As much as possible, really, for any factor that can put an interesting twist and "personalize" a scene. But I get that infinite variations is a lot of work.Honestly some small scenes in future where our sex matters would be nice
Probably not a bad idea tbh. The Patreon contributor's scenes sneak peek looked good too IMHO, so if you hold off for a couple of versions there'll probably be a fair amount of new scenes in total, in addition to the new systems being ironed out.Also, it's hence why I'm waiting for 0.4 Samantha or maybe even more I played 0.3 so much that I can wait to devour more content at once in future
If you have too high relantioship with girls as MC even if GF hits 100 they won't fuck her because of your relantioship with them.there's a lot of content that I just can't get to in this version. Noone will fuck the gf no matter how long I play
While running game code:
File "game/Player Room.rpy", line 938, in script call
call OH_sex_unseen_roll
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 343, in script
$ random_event = meanwhile_Darcy_events.get_event()
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 343, in <module>
$ random_event = meanwhile_Darcy_events.get_event()
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 412, in get_event
if event.requirements_met():
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 396, in requirements_met
if not eval(requirement):
NameError: name 'OH_BJ' is not defined
While running game code:
File "game/Player Room.rpy", line 953, in script call
call OH_sex_unseen_roll
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 337, in script
$ random_event = meanwhile_Anita_events.get_event()
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 337, in <module>
$ random_event = meanwhile_Anita_events.get_event()
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 412, in get_event
if event.requirements_met():
File "game/Meanwhile.rpy", line 396, in requirements_met
if not eval(requirement):
NameError: name 'OH_kiss' is not defined