blademaster89
Active Member
- Aug 4, 2017
- 758
- 802
- 339
The men who get labelled chauvinist, patriarchal, domineering and egotistic pigs are ones who cheat on their wives and belittle them as inferior human beings even if those wives do put effort into taking care of the house, the marriage and performing all kinds of tasks, instead of just sitting around on their ass all day.
So as long as your wife does contribute to your household, you treating her in manner MC's wife treats his lazy ass would indeed deserve all those labels. If your wife does act the way MC does, then your treatment might be warranted, but without knowing the details people would likely presume that yeah, you're one of those dudes who do it because they're assholes.
Interesting. Since you initially overlooked the second paragraph and focused on the first, let me reiterate for clarity: Would it still be warranted if I could afford to maintain a house with a pool and a live-in maid, yet treated my wife as equivalent to a maid? Especially considering she works as a freelance programmer and remains holed up in her office all day? But since I see no money coming in, I presume she is a lazy arse, freeloading off me. And because she does not commute to an office like I do, instead working from home, I further assume she should have time to tidy up the house—since, after all, she is at home all day, merely lounging about, neither working nor learning.
Now, let’s consider another hypothetical scenario: My wife is a full-time homemaker, her sole responsibility being to make our house feel like a home to return to—no drama or unnecessary complications. Yet, she does the exact opposite. What then? Or suppose she does make our house feel like a home, maintaining peace, but is undeniably lazy. Would my approach still be justified, particularly given that I earn enough to provide for my family single-handedly?
Where, then, does our main character stand in this scenario?