Create and Fuck your AI Slut -70% OFF
x

Ren'Py The Lewdest House [v0.2.31c Public] [Cathornero Games]

4.70 star(s) 90 Votes

Lewyn Collins

Engaged Member
Nov 16, 2021
3,263
3,945
387
Around 24 public updates in 33 months... some quick math and... an average of one public update every 41 days, some are some extra fixes, so lets it round to new content every 45 days, good enough?
I know western, 2D hand drawn porn games sadly come and go, so I can only say "trust me on this one, bro", but after 2 and a half years, I think I can also add "play the game and check for yourself how much we worked since launch!"
That's honestly fantastic, I'm surprised about that work ethic. An update once every 45 days (more or less), means that you actually deliver. Can be more or less depending on the month, but you don't just dissapear for years and come back with a minor bugfix, like others do. I also finished this update already, and I am liking what I see. Just, a little piece of advice:
Careful with the lolis. F95Zone is very biased with this thing. They don't mind a 9 year old looking guy fucking girls, but the opposite... Well, just be careful.
 

xxxavier

Newbie
Nov 21, 2019
47
113
174
skillissue, that's the cheat, it's for those who struggle with the valentine's event.


Hmm, according to OP, you can submit games to the list. I may do it later myself, but anyone feel free to do so.


You are right, in chapter 4, I will make pubes optional per girl, so right now I'm drawing them without it until I draw the alts and make the option available. It won't be a simple "turn pubes on/off" button, but an actual in-character dialog choice, so some girls will either have a bush or not by default.


If the last update you played had a lower number than 0.2.31, then yes (for example, 0.2.29), this one is 0.2.31c, this means it has all the content from 0.2.31 + some fixes.


Around 24 public updates in 33 months... some quick math and... an average of one public update every 41 days, some are some extra fixes, so lets it round to new content every 45 days, good enough?
I know western, 2D hand drawn porn games sadly come and go, so I can only say "trust me on this one, bro", but after 2 and a half years, I think I can also add "play the game and check for yourself how much we worked since launch!"


Thank you!! glad you like it!
Hi! By bush you mean full bush? Or trimmed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: merleved
Jan 27, 2022
45
145
109
If it’s any consolation to the people turned off by the twins, so far their content is sparse and avoidable, so the game is still worth a try right now.

Any chance you guys might consider making Lola and Lana optional as well? I know it's all in the realm of fiction and I don't judge anyone who's into it, but I'm not really fond of the idea of spending 2 chapters seducing and fucking girls that look and act like 7-year-old girls (even if they are stated to be 18 years old for legal reasons).
Also they confirmed Lola and Lana will share a chapter so it’s just one, but I understand that’s besides the point (especially considering there will no doubt be more scenes before and especially after their main chapter.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fran265

Fran265

Newbie
Dec 27, 2018
38
91
169
If it’s any consolation to the people turned off by the twins, so far their content is sparse and avoidable
That's exactly why I don't think it would be unreasonable to make the twins optional. It's not like they have a lot of content already like Lynn and Lucy, and the content that is there is avoidable, so it's not too late for the dev and writer to reconsider their decision.
 

Mommysbuttslut

Forum Fanatic
Feb 19, 2021
4,416
11,117
636
That's exactly why I don't think it would be unreasonable to make the twins optional. It's not like they have a lot of content already like Lynn and Lucy, and the content that is there is avoidable, so it's not too late for the dev and writer to reconsider their decision.
Except they're likely going to have an entire chapter dedicated primarily to them like most of the other girls have. Then that just adds extra work for the devs to create the story for those chapters while entirely avoiding developing the characters meant to be showcased. Makes it harder to connect the preceding chapter with the following one.
Besides that, anyone who's fine with Lucy but not the twins has an incredibly strange perception of all of this.
 

shmurfer

Engaged Member
Dec 29, 2019
3,083
4,739
387
That's exactly why I don't think it would be unreasonable to make the twins optional. It's not like they have a lot of content already like Lynn and Lucy, and the content that is there is avoidable, so it's not too late for the dev and writer to reconsider their decision.
At this point, play an aged up loud house game. With the required content already in the game you aren't making any moral victory excluding the twins.
 

Catspeaker 81

Member
Mar 18, 2023
207
1,317
277
Any chance you guys might consider making Lola and Lana optional as well? I know it's all in the realm of fiction and I don't judge anyone who's into it, but I'm not really fond of the idea of spending 2 chapters seducing and fucking girls that look and act like 7-year-old girls (even if they are stated to be 18 years old for legal reasons).
I legitimately understand this. That being said, there's already sexual content and teasing that's happened with Lana and Lola.
Could we make the sex stuff with them completely optional?
Maybe, but it would require A LOT of extra writing and rethinking on our parts.
I know it's dumb to say this, but I don't really see them as being their stated cartoon ages, since they act older though clearly not like adults.
Lisa worked as optional because her personal chapter is going to be the last one, and nothing within it requires any sexual activity ((It's gonna be fun and funny, all I can say is, we're planning on parodying both GTA and Breaking Bad with Lisa)).

But, Lana and Lola will share a chapter and we've kinda set things up to go sexual and romantic with them already in the current chapters.

If I had things my way, I would of aged up all of the characters from the get go, and set this game up with Lincoln being like 18...

But then it wouldn't *REALLY* be a Loud House Parody. We might as well be making an original IP at that point, and most likely we would have been overlooked among the morass of other games out there.

Parodying an existing cartoon and sticking to the canon is how DMF and I got eyes on us in the first place and how we're actually making money from this enterprise. That means compromising our own morals to some degree...

But at the end of the day... it's just drawings on paper and words on a screen. Nobody real is getting hurt, maybe a thin and flimsy excuse, but it's what I tell myself. I don't want anyone feeling guilty for gooning over this game anyway... It's meant to be a fun, light-hearted, heartfelt parody where a great young man gets to fuck all of his family... LOL.

Not the cleanest of fantasies, but then it's a fantasy, not reality.
 

NeoStarr

Member
Jul 2, 2017
378
356
259
Any chance you guys might consider making Lola and Lana optional as well? I know it's all in the realm of fiction and I don't judge anyone who's into it, but I'm not really fond of the idea of spending 2 chapters seducing and fucking girls that look and act like 7-year-old girls (even if they are stated to be 18 years old for legal reasons).
What makes Lynn and Lucy different? Or Ronnie Ann and her friend?
 
  • Like
Reactions: koljj and TBone9

Fran265

Newbie
Dec 27, 2018
38
91
169
Except they're likely going to have an entire chapter dedicated primarily to them like most of the other girls have. Then that just adds extra work for the devs to create the story for those chapters while entirely avoiding developing the characters meant to be showcased. Makes it harder to connect the preceding chapter with the following one.
You can develop characters without having them romance the main character. By making them optional, I don't mean writing Lana and Lola off like they never existed in the first place. Lincoln can help the two of them with their problems without having to fuck them.

Besides that, anyone who's fine with Lucy but not the twins has an incredibly strange perception of all of this.
By your logic, anyone who's fine with the twins, but not with Lisa has also an incredibly strange perception of this, but Lisa IS going to be optional, so I don't see how your logic applies. I could overlook Lucy's content because she's written to be more mature than her canon age, but Lola is shown having tea parties with stuffed animals and misspelling simple words, and Lana playing in the mud and getting dragged by her mother to the bathroom because she won't take a shower.


I legitimately understand this. That being said, there's already sexual content and teasing that's happened with Lana and Lola.
Could we make the sex stuff with them completely optional?
Maybe, but it would require A LOT of extra writing and rethinking on our parts.
I know it's dumb to say this, but I don't really see them as being their stated cartoon ages, since they act older though clearly not like adults.
Lisa worked as optional because her personal chapter is going to be the last one, and nothing within it requires any sexual activity ((It's gonna be fun and funny, all I can say is, we're planning on parodying both GTA and Breaking Bad with Lisa)).

But, Lana and Lola will share a chapter and we've kinda set things up to go sexual and romantic with them already in the current chapters.

If I had things my way, I would of aged up all of the characters from the get go, and set this game up with Lincoln being like 18...

But then it wouldn't *REALLY* be a Loud House Parody. We might as well be making an original IP at that point, and most likely we would have been overlooked among the morass of other games out there.

Parodying an existing cartoon and sticking to the canon is how DMF and I got eyes on us in the first place and how we're actually making money from this enterprise. That means compromising our own morals to some degree...

But at the end of the day... it's just drawings on paper and words on a screen. Nobody real is getting hurt, maybe a thin and flimsy excuse, but it's what I tell myself. I don't want anyone feeling guilty for gooning over this game anyway... It's meant to be a fun, light-hearted, heartfelt parody where a great young man gets to fuck all of his family... LOL.

Not the cleanest of fantasies, but then it's a fantasy, not reality.
I understand your vision and respect your decision. I won't insist on this topic any longer.

What makes Lynn and Lucy different? Or Ronnie Ann and her friend?
The thing is, the game goes out of its way to show that Lola and Lana behave like actual prepubescent children, unlike Lynn, Lucy and Ronnie, who behave more like horny teenagers. But as I said, I won't continue this discussion any longer. I'm not here to put myself on the moral high ground and call you guys freaks for enjoying loli content. I just wanted to voice my concerns and ask the writer if he is willing to reconsider his decision. I got my answer, so I'm done with this topic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: koljj

ningenzero115

Newbie
Nov 2, 2021
58
47
86
If it’s any consolation to the people turned off by the twins, so far their content is sparse and avoidable, so the game is still worth a try right now.



Also they confirmed Lola and Lana will share a chapter so it’s just one, but I understand that’s besides the point (especially considering there will no doubt be more scenes before and especially after their main chapter.)
my question is why are these tards looking at the game with the loli tag in it complaining or trying to avoid it they could blacklist the tag and literally play anything else
 

Catspeaker 81

Member
Mar 18, 2023
207
1,317
277
my question is why are these tards looking at the game with the loli tag in it complaining or trying to avoid it they could blacklist the tag and literally play anything else
They probably legitimately enjoyed the stuff with Lynn and Lucy and Ronnie Anne.

Nothing wrong with that.

The poster stated Lucy was written as far more mature for her age than she is supposed to be and they're correct.

I wrote Lucy more like she was a teenage Goth Girl than anything else. I don't think that's a betrayal of her character that's legitimately how she acts in the show as well.

But I also know part of Lana and Lola's appeal is the taboo nature of them being young while also wanting to be sexually active with Lincoln. So I write them as precocious.

Lana is a little more dense but it's more a willful denseness on her part. Like she doesn't want to admit to herself she's legitimately trying to seduce and entice her brother. She's not dumb she knows what sex is from watching her animals. She just wants to pretend in her own head that's not what she's trying to lead Lincoln towards, so she can act surprised and bashful when it happens.

Lola on the other hand.
She is fully aware of what she's doing. She is purposely trying to seduce her brother, it feeds her ego and she wants to become the desirable Princess he just can't stop himself from claiming when the time is right.
She'll grin knowingly, inwardly the whole time when it happens, knowing her plan succeeded.
 
4.70 star(s) 90 Votes