aFairReviewer
Newbie
- Mar 16, 2025
- 93
- 192
- 52
glad I'm not the only one lolReason why I'm still on the fence about even playing this game.
glad I'm not the only one lolReason why I'm still on the fence about even playing this game.
That's honestly fantastic, I'm surprised about that work ethic. An update once every 45 days (more or less), means that you actually deliver. Can be more or less depending on the month, but you don't just dissapear for years and come back with a minor bugfix, like others do. I also finished this update already, and I am liking what I see. Just, a little piece of advice:Around 24 public updates in 33 months... some quick math and... an average of one public update every 41 days, some are some extra fixes, so lets it round to new content every 45 days, good enough?
I know western, 2D hand drawn porn games sadly come and go, so I can only say "trust me on this one, bro", but after 2 and a half years, I think I can also add "play the game and check for yourself how much we worked since launch!"
devs say in the end of chapter we'll be able to break up with herI was hoping for a Lori scenes but all i got i the shower scene. also i dunno, kinda avoiding any Ronnie Rp Points lmao
YES! HELL YEAH!! THATS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT!!! hahahadevs say in the end of chapter we'll be able to break up with her
Hi! By bush you mean full bush? Or trimmed?skillissue, that's the cheat, it's for those who struggle with the valentine's event.
Hmm, according to OP, you can submit games to the list. I may do it later myself, but anyone feel free to do so.
You are right, in chapter 4, I will make pubes optional per girl, so right now I'm drawing them without it until I draw the alts and make the option available. It won't be a simple "turn pubes on/off" button, but an actual in-character dialog choice, so some girls will either have a bush or not by default.
If the last update you played had a lower number than 0.2.31, then yes (for example, 0.2.29), this one is 0.2.31c, this means it has all the content from 0.2.31 + some fixes.
Around 24 public updates in 33 months... some quick math and... an average of one public update every 41 days, some are some extra fixes, so lets it round to new content every 45 days, good enough?
I know western, 2D hand drawn porn games sadly come and go, so I can only say "trust me on this one, bro", but after 2 and a half years, I think I can also add "play the game and check for yourself how much we worked since launch!"
Thank you!! glad you like it!
Not sure if break up was the words used, but ignore her definitelydevs say in the end of chapter we'll be able to break up with her
I dont hate Ronnie, i just dont like her. Is that makes sense hahaI really don't understand all the Ronnie Anne hate on this thread. To each their own, I guess.
Also they confirmed Lola and Lana will share a chapter so it’s just one, but I understand that’s besides the point (especially considering there will no doubt be more scenes before and especially after their main chapter.)Any chance you guys might consider making Lola and Lana optional as well? I know it's all in the realm of fiction and I don't judge anyone who's into it, but I'm not really fond of the idea of spending 2 chapters seducing and fucking girls that look and act like 7-year-old girls (even if they are stated to be 18 years old for legal reasons).
That's exactly why I don't think it would be unreasonable to make the twins optional. It's not like they have a lot of content already like Lynn and Lucy, and the content that is there is avoidable, so it's not too late for the dev and writer to reconsider their decision.If it’s any consolation to the people turned off by the twins, so far their content is sparse and avoidable
Except they're likely going to have an entire chapter dedicated primarily to them like most of the other girls have. Then that just adds extra work for the devs to create the story for those chapters while entirely avoiding developing the characters meant to be showcased. Makes it harder to connect the preceding chapter with the following one.That's exactly why I don't think it would be unreasonable to make the twins optional. It's not like they have a lot of content already like Lynn and Lucy, and the content that is there is avoidable, so it's not too late for the dev and writer to reconsider their decision.
At this point, play an aged up loud house game. With the required content already in the game you aren't making any moral victory excluding the twins.That's exactly why I don't think it would be unreasonable to make the twins optional. It's not like they have a lot of content already like Lynn and Lucy, and the content that is there is avoidable, so it's not too late for the dev and writer to reconsider their decision.
I legitimately understand this. That being said, there's already sexual content and teasing that's happened with Lana and Lola.Any chance you guys might consider making Lola and Lana optional as well? I know it's all in the realm of fiction and I don't judge anyone who's into it, but I'm not really fond of the idea of spending 2 chapters seducing and fucking girls that look and act like 7-year-old girls (even if they are stated to be 18 years old for legal reasons).
What makes Lynn and Lucy different? Or Ronnie Ann and her friend?Any chance you guys might consider making Lola and Lana optional as well? I know it's all in the realm of fiction and I don't judge anyone who's into it, but I'm not really fond of the idea of spending 2 chapters seducing and fucking girls that look and act like 7-year-old girls (even if they are stated to be 18 years old for legal reasons).
You can develop characters without having them romance the main character. By making them optional, I don't mean writing Lana and Lola off like they never existed in the first place. Lincoln can help the two of them with their problems without having to fuck them.Except they're likely going to have an entire chapter dedicated primarily to them like most of the other girls have. Then that just adds extra work for the devs to create the story for those chapters while entirely avoiding developing the characters meant to be showcased. Makes it harder to connect the preceding chapter with the following one.
By your logic, anyone who's fine with the twins, but not with Lisa has also an incredibly strange perception of this, but Lisa IS going to be optional, so I don't see how your logic applies. I could overlook Lucy's content because she's written to be more mature than her canon age, but Lola is shown having tea parties with stuffed animals and misspelling simple words, and Lana playing in the mud and getting dragged by her mother to the bathroom because she won't take a shower.Besides that, anyone who's fine with Lucy but not the twins has an incredibly strange perception of all of this.
I understand your vision and respect your decision. I won't insist on this topic any longer.I legitimately understand this. That being said, there's already sexual content and teasing that's happened with Lana and Lola.
Could we make the sex stuff with them completely optional?
Maybe, but it would require A LOT of extra writing and rethinking on our parts.
I know it's dumb to say this, but I don't really see them as being their stated cartoon ages, since they act older though clearly not like adults.
Lisa worked as optional because her personal chapter is going to be the last one, and nothing within it requires any sexual activity ((It's gonna be fun and funny, all I can say is, we're planning on parodying both GTA and Breaking Bad with Lisa)).
But, Lana and Lola will share a chapter and we've kinda set things up to go sexual and romantic with them already in the current chapters.
If I had things my way, I would of aged up all of the characters from the get go, and set this game up with Lincoln being like 18...
But then it wouldn't *REALLY* be a Loud House Parody. We might as well be making an original IP at that point, and most likely we would have been overlooked among the morass of other games out there.
Parodying an existing cartoon and sticking to the canon is how DMF and I got eyes on us in the first place and how we're actually making money from this enterprise. That means compromising our own morals to some degree...
But at the end of the day... it's just drawings on paper and words on a screen. Nobody real is getting hurt, maybe a thin and flimsy excuse, but it's what I tell myself. I don't want anyone feeling guilty for gooning over this game anyway... It's meant to be a fun, light-hearted, heartfelt parody where a great young man gets to fuck all of his family... LOL.
Not the cleanest of fantasies, but then it's a fantasy, not reality.
The thing is, the game goes out of its way to show that Lola and Lana behave like actual prepubescent children, unlike Lynn, Lucy and Ronnie, who behave more like horny teenagers. But as I said, I won't continue this discussion any longer. I'm not here to put myself on the moral high ground and call you guys freaks for enjoying loli content. I just wanted to voice my concerns and ask the writer if he is willing to reconsider his decision. I got my answer, so I'm done with this topic.What makes Lynn and Lucy different? Or Ronnie Ann and her friend?
my question is why are these tards looking at the game with the loli tag in it complaining or trying to avoid it they could blacklist the tag and literally play anything elseIf it’s any consolation to the people turned off by the twins, so far their content is sparse and avoidable, so the game is still worth a try right now.
Also they confirmed Lola and Lana will share a chapter so it’s just one, but I understand that’s besides the point (especially considering there will no doubt be more scenes before and especially after their main chapter.)
They probably legitimately enjoyed the stuff with Lynn and Lucy and Ronnie Anne.my question is why are these tards looking at the game with the loli tag in it complaining or trying to avoid it they could blacklist the tag and literally play anything else