I think i have a bug, maybe it was adressed but cant seem to find it in the thread. I cant wear the work/gym top clothes, when I click them they either dissappear or i get my normal top clothes equipped. Because of that i can´t go to work with Bailey and progress. Any solutions? Thanks in advance.
HTML The Making of a Slut [v1.0.9] [Austinhaney6969]
- Thread starter austinhaney6969
- Start date
- Sep 17, 2020
- 294
- 142
- Sep 7, 2019
- 2,590
- 2,268
Both NOPY links on the OP (page 1) worked fine for me just now - not sure why you would get a '404' error.
- Sep 17, 2020
- 294
- 142
- Sep 7, 2019
- 2,590
- 2,268
Use the Report button on the Op and let the Uploader's know there might be problem with the NOPY downloads. Not much else we can do, really.
What's the story with the gloryhole under work? Is this a Wip? I see the options but can only select go home.
- Aug 7, 2019
- 1,869
- 4,406
This is extremely buggy. Like a lot. Whatever you re-define your relationship with Gwen, it still says roommate more than half the time, if you steal her bra and wear it, she will confront you about where you got the bra saying she doesn't remember it but if you tell the truth, you admit its not hers....except that it is. Riley will have "disappeared" and you are extremely happy to see her again, except I randomly walked and saw her literally last afternoon. The sequences breaks all over the place in this...
- Dec 21, 2017
- 508
- 389
Yeah, I need a lot of inconsistency and variable stuff added, it's a WIP, try and put on your "This is a game, I'm just here for the porn" vision.
I started a new game and at 2nd day mc used the masturbation option to get rid of 100% arousal. The preference is set to vanilla porn but the masturbation page shows 3 videos : one vanilla and two shemales. The mc is at 0% feminization, so the shemale porn seems wrong at this point.
- Dec 21, 2017
- 508
- 389
Yeah, that's specifically because most people (including myself) would rather watch a shemale masturbate, than a dude. I AM tempted to swap that out with some femboys in the near future though, if I find the time.
The compressed version has been removed from all file hosting services, can you compress the game again?
- Oct 24, 2019
- 1,391
- 1,105
Just pulled the latest download and the bugfix2 hotfix from here and immediately slammed into this when attempting to go to the orientation:
Error: Promise.allsettled is not a function
Looking in the html I find a few places where this looks to be some sort of assertion test that the dev was trying to do. One of them looks like:
It looks like this is a new
Dev....
You might want to back off on using this for the time being.
Error: Promise.allsettled is not a function
Looking in the html I find a few places where this looks to be some sort of assertion test that the dev was trying to do. One of them looks like:
Code:
Promise.allSettled(imagesLoaded).then(async (results) => {
const errors = results.filter((result) => result.status === 'rejected');
if (errors.length) {
console.error(`Paperdoll for ${this.unit} failed to load image(s): ${errors.map((error) => error.reason.imageUrl).join(', ')}`);
You must be registered to see the links
that isn't available everywhere. I'm getting one or more popups bitching about this not being defined whenever I continue on from this point. It makes things just about unplayable. Looking around for comments about support for this thing yield results like
You must be registered to see the links
.Dev....
You might want to back off on using this for the time being.
- Oct 5, 2017
- 7,548
- 10,058
It has support in every major browser except Internet Explorer (lol). Maybe the problem is with you?
- Oct 24, 2019
- 1,391
- 1,105
Not everyone is able to update to the latest. Have you thought of that? At the very least, it's unplayable for my version of Chromium.
- Oct 5, 2017
- 7,548
- 10,058
The 'new' thing that you are complaining about is over two years old. Update to a browser released this decade like everybody else.
- Oct 24, 2019
- 1,391
- 1,105
Don't ever work in mission critical or life critical software development with an attitude like that.
Let's say you have to you have to get govt approval of your development environment for "reasons". Let's also say your development team insists on using Fedora for their Linux based software. It takes a minimum of 6 months to get the govt to approve your configuration and that was a number of years ago before idiots in a previous administration and global pandemic fucked everything up. So it's probably more than a year now before you can operate after a major update. Note: you need to use "supported" stuff. Guess what? RedHat updates Fedora every six months and only supports the latest. You're screwed.
Process control software can get put into places like oil refineries and stay untouched for 15 years or more since it's such a pain in the ass to shut everything down and then start it up again.
So no, not everyone can afford to jump and download stuff in a timely manner. If you bothered to look at the status link I posted, you would see Apple Safari in the unsupported list along with M$ Edge. That last status update was last month.
Let's say you have to you have to get govt approval of your development environment for "reasons". Let's also say your development team insists on using Fedora for their Linux based software. It takes a minimum of 6 months to get the govt to approve your configuration and that was a number of years ago before idiots in a previous administration and global pandemic fucked everything up. So it's probably more than a year now before you can operate after a major update. Note: you need to use "supported" stuff. Guess what? RedHat updates Fedora every six months and only supports the latest. You're screwed.
Process control software can get put into places like oil refineries and stay untouched for 15 years or more since it's such a pain in the ass to shut everything down and then start it up again.
So no, not everyone can afford to jump and download stuff in a timely manner. If you bothered to look at the status link I posted, you would see Apple Safari in the unsupported list along with M$ Edge. That last status update was last month.
- Apr 2, 2019
- 3,006
- 10,765
So, you're on a government approved setup and can't use Docker containers nor compile a recent Chromium to /opt… but it's perfectly fine to fill it with pirated porn? And people need to run JS porn games on rugged setups placed in hard to reach locations and most probably struggling to run modern day browser to begin with, now too? Interesting.
The feature got deployed with Chrome 76 – as is confirmed by the
You must be registered to see the links
of that version – published on July 30 2019. So 'timely manner' is really stretching it. Also, the document you've linked to, as stated, is only up to date on Chrome's own progress. See
You must be registered to see the links
for details on other browsers support.
- Oct 24, 2019
- 1,391
- 1,105
I used that as an example only. However I wouldn't be surprised if some state actors weren't up to their ears in porn because they are targeting certain corrupt politicians who are doing their grift in other states. OTOH I know of at least one major porn outlet who used a certain high end software change management product back in the day.
You don't seem to understand the point of getting approval for a configuration. Just putting something in a Docker container or a full VM on something that may be approved doesn't magically make something approvable. The point is to develop and build something in an environment that will be delivered and will need to be approved and supported wherever it ends up.
The point is that the set of all users who might be interested in your product may not be running something up to date. There's people out there still running WinXP who can't afford anything else as one example. The developers of Matlab build their products on shared libraries that are at least 5 years old or older so that they can sell their product to as wide a market as they can and have it work for as long as they can.
The moral of the story is to consider what you are using and how you might work around it if a framework isn't available. Also remember that the high end hardware you might be using to develop and test your game can have flawless performance. Meanwhile the wind up toy laptop that your end user might be stuck with for their daily driver may fall flat on its face trying to run the same thing.
You don't seem to understand the point of getting approval for a configuration. Just putting something in a Docker container or a full VM on something that may be approved doesn't magically make something approvable. The point is to develop and build something in an environment that will be delivered and will need to be approved and supported wherever it ends up.
The point is that the set of all users who might be interested in your product may not be running something up to date. There's people out there still running WinXP who can't afford anything else as one example. The developers of Matlab build their products on shared libraries that are at least 5 years old or older so that they can sell their product to as wide a market as they can and have it work for as long as they can.
The moral of the story is to consider what you are using and how you might work around it if a framework isn't available. Also remember that the high end hardware you might be using to develop and test your game can have flawless performance. Meanwhile the wind up toy laptop that your end user might be stuck with for their daily driver may fall flat on its face trying to run the same thing.