PetraSilvia

New Member
Dec 3, 2025
1
5
3
Sorry if this was already posted for 1000 times but since there were so many negative comments lately I would like to present another opinion.

TLDR;
If you like JRPGs with good world building and loads of good quests, try this game.
If you are looking for porn, best skip this one.

TPE is in my opinion a very good and fun JRPG type game if you are looking for an interesting story with loads of rewarding quests, some of which are pretty deep. I didn't encounter any game breaking bugs so I guess a lot went into play testing all the complex combinations of quest progression.
The world building is solid and the characters are very well fleshed out, with very distinct personalities.
There is a lot of text to read but most of it is pretty light hearted and occasionally very funny. A lot of pop culture references made me laugh regularly. Example:
"... Look, this is Continent of Carnagecraft, not My Little Pony, okay? We solve problems by bashing them on the head, not inviting them to our birthday party."
The puzzle games are in my opinion mostly okay-ish and you have to keep in mind that you can switch the more challenging ones to easy mode without loosing rewards. On easy they are almost impossible not to solve. It might take a little time though with some, like the one with bombs. But c'mon, this is basically Sokoban and pretty nice in my opinion. JRPG without puzzles? That would be boring, wouldn't it?
What this game is definitely not, is the usual porn game. There are a few (very few in fact) very light hearted scenes that you can skip completely.
Just an opinion of a player who really likes this game.
 

Odo Shortwick

Newbie
Jun 13, 2018
22
23
101
In general, there are two types of games on here. Porn with a game wrapped around it, and games with some porn in them. The people complaining about a lack of content are looking for the first type. Story line, world building, etc is pointless to them because they're playing to see nudity and sex. If that's what someone wants, that's fine. Personally, I would rather have some story to go along with it and actually have a game to play.
 

Bob Barilaz

New Member
Oct 6, 2017
9
4
34
I don't get this kind of complaint. Why are you playing games instead of watching video if you don't want actual gameplay? Seriously, what's not to like about a classic JRPG with fucking in it as a bonus?
well in general i tend to agree but sometimes there are exceptions to every rule and while i agree that there is game play to be had so play the game, i have been thrue this game like over 10 times and EVERY time without fail i miss the one quest in the rock kingdom to do with the quest to find someone and also waste so much time on just the bomb puzzle, personally i would say the rock dungeon part needs a walkthrough/guide and the rest of the game any challenge is a fun challenge, the differance being quests you cant complete after a point should not be hidden so well or have puzzles that are frustratingly difficult.
 

Molly_O

Newbie
Sep 20, 2021
58
140
68
well in general i tend to agree but sometimes there are exceptions to every rule and while i agree that there is game play to be had so play the game, i have been thrue this game like over 10 times and EVERY time without fail i miss the one quest in the rock kingdom to do with the quest to find someone and also waste so much time on just the bomb puzzle, personally i would say the rock dungeon part needs a walkthrough/guide and the rest of the game any challenge is a fun challenge, the differance being quests you cant complete after a point should not be hidden so well or have puzzles that are frustratingly difficult.
A complete solution (walkthrough) in German and English is available above.
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Highland_Hunter

Highland_Hunter

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2019
1,456
601
260
A complete solution (walkthrough) in German and English is available above.
Above ? Above where ? . . . . There are 103 pages, "above" . . . Which, one(page), are you referring to ? :unsure:

That information included, would be more helpful, then just your 'comment', as it is stated.:rolleyes:
 

souldead341

Engaged Member
Oct 16, 2017
2,762
2,864
536
Above ? Above where ? . . . . There are 103 pages, "above" . . . Which, one(page), are you referring to ? :unsure:

That information included, would be more helpful, then just your 'comment', as it is stated.:rolleyes:
Go to the MAGICAL box in the upper right of the page. Type in the MAGICAL spell of what you want to find, then click search. This will bring up all the times it has been mentioned in the thread, including the multiple times that walkthroughs have already been posted. You can do this yourself instead of posting questions asking for people to do it for you.
 

Highland_Hunter

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2019
1,456
601
260
Go to the MAGICAL box in the upper right of the page. Type in the MAGICAL spell of what you want to find, then click search. This will bring up all the times it has been mentioned in the thread, including the multiple times that walkthroughs have already been posted. You can do this yourself instead of posting questions asking for people to do it for you.
Verry Funny . . . , (n) but Not really, give it up .

That, still hasn't answered the question, to their comment/posting .

They specifically stated that, the walk-troughs were available "above" , as-in a previous comment/posting, . . .

NOT !, as via a "search" . :rolleyes:
 

souldead341

Engaged Member
Oct 16, 2017
2,762
2,864
536
Verry Funny . . . , (n) but Not really, give it up .

That, still hasn't answered the question, to their comment/posting .

They specifically stated that, the walk-troughs were available "above" , as-in a previous comment/posting, . . .

NOT !, as via a "search" . :rolleyes:
Translation, you're still being too lazy to look above in the thread manually or via the search function. Above is the general term used to indicated that it was previously posted in the thread, not just on this page of the thread (especially when people can adjust how many posts are shown on a page on many forums).

Now, if you ABSOLUTELY insist that someone ELSE MUST directly post the link, page number, or post number for you, good luck. There are people who are willing to do that, but I personally am of the "teach a man to fish" school of thought rather than the "give a man a fish" side. Seriously, you could have found the walkthrough within about 5 minutes at most of you first posting if you'd bothered to do the work yourself.
 

Highland_Hunter

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2019
1,456
601
260
Translation, you're still being too lazy to look above in the thread manually or via the search function. Above is the general term used to indicated that it was previously posted in the thread, not just on this page of the thread (especially when people can adjust how many posts are shown on a page on many forums).

Now, if you ABSOLUTELY insist that someone ELSE MUST directly post the link, page number, or post number for you, good luck. There are people who are willing to do that, but I personally am of the "teach a man to fish" school of thought rather than the "give a man a fish" side. Seriously, you could have found the walkthrough within about 5 minutes at most of you first posting if you'd bothered to do the work yourself.
LOL . . . You just proved my point .(y)

Their comment/post was not helpful/useful, and didn't need posting .

Thank You, for proving MY point ! :sneaky:

:LOL::ROFLMAO:
 
3.70 star(s) 40 Votes