And again, I did it:
It's you who keep ignoring what I write, and then inventing alternative facts. I'm quoting myself all the time to prove you wrong.
This is what I initially wrote about the harem in the game:
4º I couldn't put up with the game for long, but from what I know from my gameplay experience and what I read from others, you get a hentai harem in place just to be required to end up with only one. And the story is presented, as hard as it could, for you to end up with the BPD. Really? The game sets up a hentai harem for you just to be REQUIRED to choose only one? I get it had to be the BPD because it's the author own daughter, but then why setting up the harem story.
Did I say I was disappointed by the lack of a harem in the game? No
I said this:
My key points, for those which were home schooled around here:
- Poorest harem ever written
- The game throws women at you, happily into your harem, since the very first minutes of the game and during the main plot (the trip to the rockstar's away house)
- After much of the game being a harem plot, then you are forced to choose only one
- If the dev wants to force you to choose only one, then the harem should be either removed or toned down, because monogamous only women would never allow the protagonist to freely fuck around in front of them (like he did in the harem trip)
No, I don't, it's why my reasoning is solid and yours isn't.
Which are all inside the game folder, it's not like it's summoned out of nowhere using black magic. There are tools to check Renpy content without having to sequentially play it all.
How can you write such a childishly offensive and unwarranted comment, and then accuse me of throwing a tantrum?
I'm the adult here, trying to have a reasonable conversation about unrecommending games, specially those which get recommended all the time to everyone. And keeping it civil, despite an inordinate amount of hate. All while you keep flaming me, but at once accusing me of being negative...
75% of a game, 8 hours in, is enough to know if a game is shit or not. I'm not talking about being able to minutely describe it, but to tell apart if it's a shit or not.
And this game, to me IS SHIT. It's not my fault you are a fanboi and 99.99999% or 100% wouldn't be enough for you, if you can't prevent your little fanboi feelings from getting hurt, then don't come here and stick to the official butt-kissing thread.
I never had to deal with home schooled people, so I was wrong taking for granted adult men remember how it was to be 12 years old around other 12 years old mates.
Now I see there are (presumably) adult men around there which never experienced what a 12 years old male environment was, and which can't comprehend other men which do know and do remember.
And again:
View attachment 4270340
View attachment 4270341
"
THE LARGE TEXTS YOU READ AT THE END OF CHAPTER 6 HAPPENED IN REAL LIFE... ESPECIALLY THE PART WHEN SHE TOLD HIM TO WRITE THE STORY -- THE HUG, AND THE LAST TIME HE WOULD SEE HER ALIVE."
Is that real enough for you?
Since you are such a fanboi, you could ask himself if it wasn't all a fantasy.
Did you actually ever read or went to any Shakespeare stage play? Because if you did, you would know that even though he included magic in a few of his workings, it was all coherent inside each lore. And women were accurately portrayed, like in Othello.
I thought you would have at least played the game, since you are such a fanboi:
- The game starts with the protagonist recovering from some kind of heart broken depression, because his wife/girlfriend suddenly dumped him and disappeared, so he was single and open to new relationships
- The first scene is the protagonist and his buddy sidekick circling the macho wagons, preparing to go out on the hunt
- Hot women literally throw themselves at him, happily joining and contributing to run his harem
- Not only none of them talked about being monogamous, but they looked like being comfortable with being cattled into the protagonist harem
I don't know if you know, but monogamous people don't act like that, so it isn't exactly like it was a "monogamous relationship only" what was suggested by the early and mid parts of the game.
I do that all the time, but with games which AREN'T UTTER S.H.I.T.
Many other games have early open relationships until a certain point, and then either require you to choose, or offer you to choose but keep an option to keep being with open relationships. As with Being a DIK and many others.
And in those games, the harem isn't as blatantly thrown down your throat as it is in this game, as in Being a DIK and many others.
Pretty much, yes, in every AVN ever made. If you aren't playing AVNs to have sex, you are doing it wrong.
It's like playing chess and never moving any pieces or something.
The Room did well but nobody, except you, consider it a good movie.
I know enough prostitutes to know why they are in it for, which it isn't always the same reason but there is definitely a finite set of reasons, the others posible reasons (like a certain prostitute in the world doing it because she read it in her horoscope) being absolutely statistically negligible.
You are a proponent of
"Ignoramus et ignorabimus" and I'm of
"Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen".
Like David Hilbert replied 94 years ago to those of your school of thought. and still totally true today:
We must not believe those, who today, with philosophical bearing and deliberative tone, prophesy the fall of culture and accept the ignorabimus. For us there is no ignorabimus, and in my opinion none whatever in natural science. In opposition to the foolish ignorabimus our slogan shall be Wir müssen wissen – wir werden wissen ("We must know – we will know").
Natural science is totally able to explain at least >95% of prostitutes motives, and if there are unknown reasons it couldn't still, it will.
Enough said about The Room, it fits your other opinions.
So you invent alternative facts all the time about what I think or thought, but at once accuse me of not providing proof etc...
What is your proof of that? I already provided my proof why that female spy story is in line with the rest of the story, except for the suicidal BPD: a 12 years old boy fantasy.
I get it someone which considers The Room a good movie must have waived coherency as a desirable attribute, but I find the lack of coherency a massive turn off, everywhere, including in fiction.
The female "spy" being a joke of a spy, in a serious game tributed to a dead daughter is offensive enough for me.
1) I assume the majority of LOF fanbois are in the official thread and on the dev Patreon/Subscribestar/the like, but I definitely got a few hard cases here
2) , 3) , 4), 5) and 6) You agreed to this hateful piece with a happy emote:
so now don't play dumb.
You are really intelligent:
You must be registered to see the links
"
Intelligence agency" under the authority of the "
Director of National Intelligence"
Would they deal in intelligence things?
Well well well, "
Global monitoring, collection, and processing of information and data", you really know your shit, don't you. Also they employ "
a variety of measures, the majority of which are clandestine", everything sounds very
intelligent to me.
Nothing related to spies though, of course, nothing at all.
Wasn't it a happy ending for you? Damn, then what's a happy ending for you? Besides LOF and The Room, of course.
I don't know, please tell me like if English were your first, second or third language:
"
WAS" a major in the military police is the part you missed, "
was" as in he is no longer in either the military or related to the military police.
He worked in the military police after being graduated from West Point, which is the academy where tons of USA SPIES are recruited from.
What he actually does in the novels and movies, is to be a solo drifter, always acting in unknown territory, having to resort to operate with whatever he can get around by chance (like a spy, not like a military policeman).
Does a military policeman usually operate secretly, alone, outside of the army or any official hierarchy, outside of any chain of command, with whatever he can muster around by chance? No, totally the opposite, they always operate inside the chain of command, surrounded by other military policemen, with their provided equipment, following strict orders and almost never behind enemy lines.
Does a spy usually operate secretly, alone, outside of the army or any official hierarchy, outside of any chain of command, with whatever he can muster around by chance? Yes, all the time, when they are behind enemy lines and can't contact anybody else.
Jack Reacher in the books and movies is acting like a spy, doing spy things, using spy tricks. He isn't arresting military personnel in a military policeman uniform, like the military police does.
I tried to dumb it down as much as I could to highlight the difference between military policeman actions and spy actions.
I filled this post with facts you were ignoring since the beginning, you aren't about facts but about being hateful.
No, that's what you do. Accusing others of what you actually do is called projection, it's what some people do when they can't process their own thoughts.
It's not, as I abundantly made it clear.
I hate LOF, and I pity the fool who thinks it's a good game. But if I wanted a thread to just hate on that game, I would have called it "
LOF Hate's Club" and not "
The thread for the NOT recommended games".
Now, if you could stop being hateful here, we could have a constructive dialogue about games. Thank you.
