"Nope you left out most of that... what he ACTUALLY wrote was....
" Pregnancy is my fetish, so the idea of impregnating an entire town of horny women is extremely appealing to me. But as of Episode 2 The Builder does nothing good with its plot. "
He was reffering to pregnancy and how nothing good was done with it. That's why he wrote "it's plot" it's = pregnancy...not game plot."
I don't know how you could assume that it's = pregancy and not it's = the game, and so confidently, no wonder you are so good at patronising everyone, you know what they mean more than they do!
"Again, nope, as I said before pregnancy and harem are late game additions usually (unless the main or sole focus of the game for pregnancy) and his "review" clearly stated there was a bait and switch, meaning no harem or pregnancy would be ingame and that is false as it was still early in the game dev and there is NO way you could know for certain they would not be added.
Basically his "review" said there WOULD not be instead of is not yet... that is a big difference."
His review does not say there would not be anything, another huge assumption.
And the tags are meant to be for current content, otherwise they should be shown as planned content.
If the game has the wrong tags worth mentioning in the review for people looking for said tags.
"He mentioned the version, talked about NON-existent content NOT current state of game, parts of the plot without context but with his dislike of those parts.
It has nothing to do with what I like or don't like
He said he didn't break ANY rules, then
admitted it wasn't objective (one rule broken) and Fixated on NTR (second rule broken) the break down I gave was just countering his arguments as to why he didn't break rules."
If reviews should be deleted for not being about the current state of the game, should we report the 100's of reviews from "where it all began" because they are from the previous version before the remake, a completely different games?
Strange take, defeats the purpose of having the thread guideline about showing what update you are reviewing.
but you seem to be a bit of an expert so i would probably agree with you there.
"I was making a point that you only saw what you wanted too and that your point was incomplete as you left ALOT of details for each of those reviews out. As for if they were good, 2 did their jobs clearly and the other 2 should be reported."
I didn't only see what i wanted, i was highlighting worse reviews that remained on the game thread, because you were so baffled as to how he thought his review was acceptable.
then your response was saying that each one was good, i am happy you back peddled now, but that wasn't your first response was it.
"No, just because a review gets a like does NOT mean it was helpful. It could mean others wanted pregnancy in the game ahead of time, others could like his views on NTR, others could be unhappy with the speed of the game or updates and just like a bunch of negative reviews, others have found the way he referred to the MC as funny, others could be upset the harem path wasn't getting enough content as the ntr path AND other might have found it helpful....but there is no way to know for certain if it was one of those things, some of those things or all of those things."
It doesnt mean it was helpful, some people just liked it because they wanted one of the tags in the game which he highlighted were not in the game... which somehow in your head is not helpful?
You are assuming everyone that likes this negative review does so for the wrong reason.
At this point you might as well right everyones review for them, then tell people how and why they should like it.
Go a step further, delete all the ones you don't like.... oh wait.
" I've been following this game since 0.01 and
never really understood what the dev was aiming at, but just finished episode 3 and must say that
this game has found a real niche in a netori dynamic, and a
rural Norwegian setting. Excited to see this game thrive"
Does that review give you an idea of what you might get when starting the game? yes - norwegian netori?
Does that review give you an idea of what kind of pace you could expect from the game? yes - if you can get that from the above review you are wearing rose tinted glasses
Does that review give you an idea of how well it handles some CURRENT contents in the reviewers opinion? yes - Again really reading into the review, it says it has a netori dynamic, you can assume he likes it, but anything more and you should apply that to the negative reviews and assume they are all giving an idea how the game is handling some current contents.
Does that review give you an idea of the atmosphere and setting the games story takes place in? yes It says the setting, not the atmosphere
Does that review give you an idea if the reviewer thinks it's worth giving the game a try? yes - like the negative ones suggest the game isn't worth giving the game a try
Now the other "review"
Does that review give you an idea of what you might get when starting the game? nope - He says what you won't get against the games tags, equally as useful
Does that review give you an idea of what kind of pace you could expect from the game? nope - does every review need to?
Does that review give you an idea of how well it handles some CURRENT contents in the reviewers opinion? nope- it does DOES against the version he is REVEIWING which he STATES CLEARLY
but does say what WON'T be added...and " some simp who swore a vow of chastity because he's too on the hook to move on from the worst love interest ever. Don't make me sit through this loser cumming 3 seconds after seeing a barely exposed nipple because he's too cucked to be around women." - he talks about his opinion of the MC and you read he is saying the game will never have content, massively over reaching on your part.
"swore a vow of chastity" inaccurate, "worst love interest ever" inaccurate so so giving false information... - You want to report every review that uses a metaphor or hyperbole?
"Best game ever"! - "Hactually this is not the best game ever, that is misinformation, you exagerated" - Morphnet
Does that review give you an idea of the atmosphere and setting the games story takes place in? nope and doesnt need to
Does that review give you an idea if the reviewer thinks it's worth giving the game a try? nope, because the information given is either inaccurate or completely wrong. - you honestly, after his whole review, think it is even slightly ambiguous whether the reviewer thinks people should give this game a try? this response in particular detracts your credibility, you have made MASSIVE assumptions on what the reviewer means/thought, yet you can't possibly read from it whether he thinks it's worth giving it a try.
Does his review cover " Story, Originality, Renders, Sound, Playability, Performance, Bugs, Animations, Voice Acting, Grammar, Amount of content " ?
Story - yes - plot
Amount of content - yes number of scenes, content of three different tags
So you tell me which of those 2 is more helpful?
Obciously it depends, because you managed turn a 2 sentance review into a fountain of helpful info, but deduced nothing from a massive review.
I personally think his review was more helpful and the majority of people would agree, and they would do so to reacting to each review... that spoke for itself
I can't speak for others on that but I will say this, most negative reviews are written in a terrible way and if people just stopped and thought calmly / objectively they COULD find a way to leave a negative review.
Example...
Having read Rufio's replies I find them well worded and passionate, he seems to put alot of effort and research in them.
I think with some practice and time he will be able to improve them to the point where his point is easy to see and understand.
While he made a few mistakes in reading some others replies he was open and engaging and left room for discussion although some parts did seem to convey frustration on his part.
While I don't personally agree with his points, I am sure they will strike a cord with some and help continue the discussion.
I give him 2 stars.
or
Dude, like wtf he clearly friend wit other dude. like serious. bad replies. 2 stars.
Which do you think is the better choice? - You are right the detailed paragraph is much better than the 2 sentence response, and i say that even though i don't agree with the paragraph, but the reviewer is entitled to his opinion.
Seems to mirror the reviews we were talking about very closely too.
"although some parts did seem to convey frustration on his part." -
This must be in response to:
" Of course you can ignore those things if you like but no sure why when they are among the things advised in the review rules thread.... "
Don't worry, i didn't take offense and could understand your reason for being condescending. Kudos for bringing it up rather than focusing on a direct response to it
