Can't understand the movie theater..no sense.drugbing Sarah..not into it..opening scene.was greatdinner ok...should have had Lester in dominating mode at apartment and completely finish the night taken Sarah anallthis would complete Lester's control..
I'll add that I too didn't really care for the theater scene, however I don't think it's pandering to his patron's (I'll get to that). The concept of the scene was an important one but personally I would have preferred a different setting.
It served many psychological purposes for the 3 MCs.
- 3some: It showed for Sarah once again that, what she wanted, Lester could provide for her in a far better way than Dan ever could. “You wanted more than one cock. Dan couldn’t deliver but Lester does.”
- It deepened Sarah's exhibitionistic kink.
- For Lester it achieved quite a few of his goals;
1) he got Sarah to admit that he was her boyfriend and that her pussy was under his control. “He’s my boyfriend,” Sarah said, “It’s his pussy.”
2) it reinforced for Sarah that Lester was only going to share her by his rules, that he wasn't Dan and wouldn't let her run wild
3) it fueled his taunting and humiliations of Dan--it was Lester who suggested for Sarah to call Dan--and Dan had to witness all of the above.
I'm intrigued by the subtext of the dinner scene and some of the nods that Renee might be the dominant in her marriage and a possible hotwife. “It’s a wonder she hasn’t found a paramour.”
As for Tricia I much prefer reading about her seducing Dan than reading about the background of TLG or SS companies. I do think it would be a dark irony if Tricia does seduce Dan, he wakes up and realizes he lost Sarah, marries Tricia and then finds out she is into some twisted shit that would make even Sarah blush.