- Mar 14, 2020
- 54
- 41
Can anyone upload the ela and over-motivated recruit extended ?
Collection Video Trahao collection [2024-03-09] [Trahao]
Oh damn Trahao uploaded something new. Animation with the Plain Doll from Bloodborne. There seems to be a Lady Maria version too.
- Dec 15, 2019
- 386
- 2,360
- Nov 3, 2017
- 282
- 272
trahao security on leaker are so high he can track them easy thats why there are too few who sharesno hero anymore
- Sep 4, 2021
- 84
- 142
It seems that whenever someone shares his work on this forum, he track down whoever did so and ban them from his page, preventing them from subscribing again. You can check the previous pages to see it happened to a few guys.
Trahao isn't the only one.
Blackadder is known to be able to track down leakers and ban them from their paysites.
Trooch, MeetAndFuckGames, and Illuxxxtrandy I remember download links and uploaded videos of their works got deleted most likely by working with mods and the hosting sites like MEGA. Someone lost an entire collection of MnF games when their MEGA drive was purged.
Blackadder is known to be able to track down leakers and ban them from their paysites.
Trooch, MeetAndFuckGames, and Illuxxxtrandy I remember download links and uploaded videos of their works got deleted most likely by working with mods and the hosting sites like MEGA. Someone lost an entire collection of MnF games when their MEGA drive was purged.
What's the point of this site if mods are going to snitch on leakers here?
Don't ask me. I was just sharing what was discussed in the past.
If I had to guess, the mods here are just removing or disapproving shared download links. It is the file hosting sites that are telling who uploaded the leaked content because creators are legally allowed to protect their own works from piracy. Again this is just a guess.
Why do you think mods are snitching on leakers? It's more likely that some artists are using invisible watermarks or something similar to identify who shares content. And what could mods here do anyways? No smart leaker would use the same user name and/or mail address here and for artist subscriptions. I'm also guessing most artists know about f95zone,it just takes one google search of their name to find it.
Artists absolutely know about this site some of them are even active here. Lewdgazer himself shares some of his works here.
- Jan 19, 2019
- 523
- 527
This story sounds like alarmism. To be fair, MEGA might ban your account if you host illegal (incl. copyright infringing) content, but due to how their encryption works, they can't see if you host that unless you link it with the decryption key. So just make a free account and host there.
Also, I'm not sure, but don't pay site have some sort of anonymity going on? Even if the creator is paranoid enough to share custom files to each of their subscriber with some sort of key in them to figure out who leaked it, and they ban the user, the user should be able to just make a new account. I doubt Patreon, etc. share your card details like your name with creators, do they?
Basically, there are ways around this. Hunting down leakers sounds less efficient than just implementing superior security. Boombadaboom, for example, has a system where it's impossible to get his stuff through automatic leaking sites, by using some weird image link sharing thing, I forget the details, it's been a while since I read about it.
Also, I'm not sure, but don't pay site have some sort of anonymity going on? Even if the creator is paranoid enough to share custom files to each of their subscriber with some sort of key in them to figure out who leaked it, and they ban the user, the user should be able to just make a new account. I doubt Patreon, etc. share your card details like your name with creators, do they?
Basically, there are ways around this. Hunting down leakers sounds less efficient than just implementing superior security. Boombadaboom, for example, has a system where it's impossible to get his stuff through automatic leaking sites, by using some weird image link sharing thing, I forget the details, it's been a while since I read about it.
- Sep 6, 2021
- 573
- 957
using a system that allows them to implement watermaks to every single userr would necessitate them giving different archive links to people or using a datasite that doesnt allow up to download without putting in their own watermark as a functionality in order to idently them
more likely is the fact someone babbled, the leaker has the same username on both sites, or they were banning newest subs cause they sub in, leak and leave for max gains with min costs
- Sep 25, 2021
- 561
- 1,261
Ahhh and I was thinking about subbing. That'd be no then, don't like the zealous copyright types.
Last edited:
- Sep 25, 2021
- 561
- 1,261
That is indeed a very bad idea. Still being so petty as to ban people, meh.