You are certainly right for the most part; at least in the current state of AI, it is an extremely good mimic who uses the info you feed it to output something similar, but it can't generate anything new on its own. It can certainly do what you tell it to, and it will mimic your creativity, but it can't be creative on its own. However, when true AI, or AGI, is reached, then the gate to hell won't be able to be close. And from what I see, they are already planning to use brain cells to do that—a biological AI system if you will; whenever it will be successful is another matter.No, AI is fine for generating a random image with a similar design, that's why all the new AI games are garbage because they generate images without variants since AI lacks creativity, and even if a human uses AI, you will never be able to create anything other than random images copying a drawing style. This generates a devaluation of the product, Since those of us who like this type of drawings look for creativity, originality and style and not a copy of someone and AI will never be able to copy those 3 things and unfortunately, the people who use AI lack these 3 things, which is why they delegate it to a program.
And if I'm wrong, tell me why people are here and follow the work of this particular artist and not a random AI image forum
You must be registered to see the links
Last edited: