Mod Ren'Py Universal Ren'Py Mod / URM [2.5] (mod any Ren'Py game yourself)

[Darkrider1222]

AGENT 17 free version: i tried to use URM but when i increase the money and try to make a purchase in game a window appears saying "you cannot cheat in this free version of the game" anyone has solution to this? even if i restart the game and try to make any purchase turning URM off, it still shows the same message ie, "you cannot cheat in this free version of the game"

 

[Boehser Onkel]

AGENT 17 free version: i tried to use URM but when i increase the money and try to make a purchase in game a window appears saying "you cannot cheat in this free version of the game" anyone has solution to this? even if i restart the game and try to make any purchase turning URM off, it still shows the same message ie, "you cannot cheat in this free version of the game"

https://f95zone.to/threads/agent17-v0-24-8-hexatail.70810/post-11817860

 

[Boehser Onkel]

I've put this into lucky monster game and the game doesn't start.

extract the .rpa file
should work

 

[FaceCrap]

Am I the only one who gets %85 progress bar after finishing eternum 0.8?

Probably, just means you haven't seen _every_ dialogue line, and that's most likely because you didn't play every possible route.

 

[FaceCrap]

pretty sure this is the wrong thread here

Nope. It deals with the new progressbar feature, could affect any game so not a game feature.
Some folks expect it to say 100% after they finished an update of a game in which URM is installed, but they don't realize a game may have different paths, so they don't see every line of dialogue, thus the progress never reaches 100%

 

[Boehser Onkel]

Nope. It deals with the new progressbar feature, could affect any game so not a game feature.
Some folks expect it to say 100% after they finished an update of a game in which URM is installed, but they don't realize a game may have different paths, so they don't see every line of dialogue, thus the progress never reaches 100%

aah
i see
my bad then

 

[KKnuck]

extract the .rpa file
should work

I've put the rpa file into 'game' folder. I thought that was enough?

 

[Boehser Onkel]

I've put the rpa file into 'game' folder. I thought that was enough?

sometimes the dev's make options/preferences at the code to prevent "external" .rpa to load
and yes i tested it - it should work with the extracted files

 

[KKnuck]

sometimes the dev's make options/preferences at the code to prevent "external" .rpa to load
and yes i tested it - it should work

Damn. It worked on previous version so maybe added with a new update. No way around it I guess. Thanks anyway. Will definitely find use for this elsewhere.

 

[qljrnt6jc4eh2]

Is there a mod like this but for Unity anywhere here? I felt forced to post this here since searching for "Unity + cheat" inside the Modding section didn't really help.

 

[Boehser Onkel]

Is there a mod like this but for Unity anywhere here? I felt forced to post this here since searching for "Unity + cheat" inside the Modding section didn't really help.

unity is .dll modding
a whole other world
and as far as i know there is no such tool

 

[Boehser Onkel]

Is there a mod like this but for Unity anywhere here? I felt forced to post this here since searching for "Unity + cheat" inside the Modding section didn't really help.

uhm for what game where you looking ?
maybe i can take a look at the dll
activating dev mode or something

 

[vayora5984]

URM 2.5: Variable ignore option

Here's a new major release of URM. The main new feature it the possibility to ignore variables in path detection and in the codeview. This could be useful when you for example have a game that constantly checks a is_patched variable.
You can enable/disable this after remembering a variable.

Changelog:

• Added option to ignore variables in path detection and/or codeview
• Implemented custom tooltips system (prevents issues with games that use Ren'Py's system in an unconventional way)
• List all possible items when searching nothing (an empty string)
• Fix: Progressbar total could be 1 off

I think there is a slight "bug" in the 2.5 release. I say "bug" in quotes, because I think it is actually better than before. When searching with wildcard off, it treats it as a double end wildcard anyway. This makes quick searches for occurrences of a word (e.g. "points') much simpler, and it feels more intuitive. So if this was an unintentional change, I'd say keep it!