HiHaHo
Engaged Member
- Jan 2, 2023
- 2,589
- 3,994
- 387
Don't fret a fuck ... The only sad thing is that folks can't comprehend or interpret common EnglishHi! I’m glad you like the game. There’s no lesbian content and I don’t plan on adding it in the long run.
The game is and will be Harem. So if you like that tag, you’ll enjoy the game![]()
Not sure if it's accurate or not, since it's not like I've scoured every comment of every game... but I think most actually like the option for FFM threesomes (2 women with the mc at the same time), which isn't quite the same as lesbian scenes (just 2 women, possibly with the mc watching which is probably even worse if he's there and can't join)... so perhaps you should do a poll? Ask if people want FFM scenes or only 1-on-1 scenes? Honestly, I don't agree with the dude who finds lesbian scenes to be NTR, anyway... and especially not FFM (with the mc as the male). But I figure a poll is the best way to get the opinions of most potential players. Maybe I'm actually in the minority, loving FFM scenes. Idk.Hi! No, that's completely wrong. In the game, there are literally only two characters who, you could say, at some point felt some kind of affection for another woman. All the others have no interest in that at all.
I like both. Honestly I always get the feeling the absolute no lesbians in the harem types are just an incredibly vocal minority. I suspect most people straight up don't care one way or another, especially if it's optional.Not sure if it's accurate or not, since it's not like I've scoured every comment of every game... but I think most actually like the option for FFM threesomes (2 women with the mc at the same time), which isn't quite the same as lesbian scenes (just 2 women, possibly with the mc watching which is probably even worse if he's there and can't join)... so perhaps you should do a poll? Ask if people want FFM scenes or only 1-on-1 scenes? Honestly, I don't agree with the dude who finds lesbian scenes to be NTR, anyway... and especially not FFM (with the mc as the male). But I figure a poll is the best way to get the opinions of most potential players. Maybe I'm actually in the minority, loving FFM scenes. Idk.
yeah the idea off a poll is nice and all ,but IMO the way to go is make it optional ,those who like it will go for it,and those who don't won't ...I like both. Honestly I always get the feeling the absolute no lesbians in the harem types are just an incredibly vocal minority. I suspect most people straight up don't care one way or another, especially if it's optional.
I mean, yes, if enough people want it. But if 90% don't like the idea anyway, why bother? I'm guessing at absolute worst it'd be like 60/40, but idk, hence recommending a poll. Then, if enough people want it, strongly consider adding it and make it optional. I think most things should be optional in VNs and RPGs... that's kinda the point. These games give choices, so give lots of choices. (Though some VN creators go way too far with that, and they're like, "Oh, you want as many choices as possible? Click to wake up. Click to get dressed. Click to go to work. No, you don't have 2 or more options to choose from. It's just to give you a 'choice' to click." lol)yeah the idea off a poll is nice and all ,but IMO the way to go is make it optional ,those who like it will go for it,and those who don't won't ...
the ratio's would be more like 30 for / 60 indifferent / 10 against. like MBS said those who are against it just a are very loud minority at least in the harem tag circle(where i travel).I mean, yes, if enough people want it. But if 90% don't like the idea anyway, why bother? I'm guessing at absolute worst it'd be like 60/40, but idk, hence recommending a poll. Then, if enough people want it, strongly consider adding it and make it optional. I think most things should be optional in VNs and RPGs... that's kinda the point. These games give choices, so give lots of choices. (Though some VN creators go way too far with that, and they're like, "Oh, you want as many choices as possible? Click to wake up. Click to get dressed. Click to go to work. No, you don't have 2 or more options to choose from. It's just to give you a 'choice' to click." lol)
Not sure if it's accurate or not, since it's not like I've scoured every comment of every game... but I think most actually like the option for FFM threesomes (2 women with the mc at the same time), which isn't quite the same as lesbian scenes (just 2 women, possibly with the mc watching which is probably even worse if he's there and can't join)... so perhaps you should do a poll? Ask if people want FFM scenes or only 1-on-1 scenes? Honestly, I don't agree with the dude who finds lesbian scenes to be NTR, anyway... and especially not FFM (with the mc as the male). But I figure a poll is the best way to get the opinions of most potential players. Maybe I'm actually in the minority, loving FFM scenes. Idk.
I'm in favor of threesomes, but only when they focus on the MC, and the girls don't touch each other in a sexual way. As I said in my previous comment, I'm in favor of almost any fetish as long as the MC is only the romantic or sexual focus. Otherwise, from my point of view, and I'm just giving my opinion, not trying to impose it on anyone, to me, that's like NTS (Netorase), which means you're voluntarily giving or sharing your romantic or sexual partner with another person. Mostly, when people talk about that label, it refers to sharing with another man, but for me, it's the same because I don't like sharing my partner with anyone else, be it a man, a woman, an animal, etc.the ratio's would be more like 30 for / 60 indifferent / 10 against. like MBS said those who are against it just a are very loud minority at least in the harem tag circle(where i travel).
in the end it should be 100% how UAB(the dev) wants it to be,its his story to write after all, if he wants to add girl on girl action he should.
he will get his fans regardless if he does or not as long as he writes it properly.
Letting a poll decide things like this is a bad idea IMO, especially if its content related it could be used as a survey or something along those lines but only for things for which he uncertain about.
as for choice's they've fine thus far aside from the vampire or hunter route is the only one that isn't a do want a Lewdscence or start a LI path.
and even that one choice still goes back into 1 main plot line, it could hold some more things later down the line.
no more choices are really needed aside from opting into certain fetishes or paths.
anyway as just my personal opinion i think he should add threesome's ,he could be make them just 2 girls focusing on the MC,or do allow intimacy between and girls and add a choice to for those who don't want it.
its all up to dev if he wants to put the time into that,he could go HAM and make a scene with like 3 variations ,a choice where you pick a 1on1 between 2 girls / one where its a threesome with girl on girl action and one for threesome without girl on girl.
4 scene's for one choice a lot off work to be done.
the middle of the road path is force the threesome but 2 scene's one with girl on girl and one without ,just 2 scene's then so less dev time required.
So far, it seems like a good game. I'm going to keep an eye on it.
I just hope that if there's lesbian content, it's completely avoidable and not just skip the scene, but not happen at all. My apologies to those who love lesbian content, and I don't mean to offend anyone, but from my point of view, it's like NTS because you share your woman with another person, and I don't like that, even if it's shared with another woman.
I think a harem game should focus on the MC, both romantically and sexually. I don't mind adding almost any fetish, but the only one that would bother me is a LI being with someone other than the MC.
I think you guys are in the minority, but that's why I'm in favor of games having options, anyway. Edit: (Sticking it here because it's most relevant here) 6 of the 8 reactions on my post disagreed with me, so at least among the people interested in this game, you appear to be in the majority. So maybe I'm just totally wrong, or maybe it's different on other games pages, and I'm not completely crazy? Idk.As I said, I'm not trying to impose anything, just giving my opinion with respect. I saw that my previous comment had several likes, so I'm not the only one who sees it that way.
A man can satisfy two women at the same time. You just need a little imagination. For example, he can use his mouth to bring her to orgasm or prepare her with his fingers until it's her turn to have his cock. They can also talk dirty, he kisses the other woman, they can play a little role-playing game where one of the women tells the MC and the other girl what to do, etc., etc. It all depends on a little imagination. I'm sure there are 1,000 more ways that I'm not mentioning, but they're just small examples.I think you guys are in the minority, but that's why I'm in favor of games having options, anyway. Edit: (Sticking it here because it's most relevant here) 6 of the 8 reactions on my post disagreed with me, so at least among the people interested in this game, you appear to be in the majority. So maybe I'm just totally wrong, or maybe it's different on other games pages, and I'm not completely crazy? Idk.
But man... why even have a threesome if they won't touch each other? What a waste. Let's be real, a guy is not gonna please two women at once, successfully, if they don't assist with that. I suppose they COULD just touch themselves... but that's boring. Like, at that point, why don't they just all masturbate? And then we can go one further, and they can all do it comfortably in separate rooms.
That's almost like inviting 2 people to play Smash Bros with you, but they'll only attack you, and only you can attack them. I just don't get your logic. But whatever. Like I've said, IF the dev even adds it, it should optional to have a threesome in the first place. But I don't think your version of a threesome makes any sense, dude.
I hope it doesn't sound like I'm being hostile, because I'm not intending to. I have Asperger's Syndrome. I'm bad with words. Your opinion just seems illogical to me lol. But I still don't want it forced on you. Just like I wouldn't want NTR forced on me despite NTR fans possibly not understanding why I don't like it? Idk lmao
Don't tell me you never be in real 3some, without telling me you never be in 3some ))But man... why even have a threesome if they won't touch each other? What a waste. Let's be real, a guy is not gonna please two women at once, successfully, if they don't assist with that. I suppose they COULD just touch themselves... but that's boring. Like, at that point, why don't they just all masturbate? And then we can go one further, and they can all do it comfortably in separate rooms.
That's almost like inviting 2 people to play Smash Bros with you, but they'll only attack you, and only you can attack them. I just don't get your logic. But whatever. Like I've said, IF the dev even adds it, it should optional to have a threesome in the first place. But I don't think your version of a threesome makes any sense, dude.
There's a bias towards negativity. For one thing a lot of people are in this thread discussing this solely because they're bothered at the idea that there might be lesbian content in this game. That and they feel there's a disconnect between the game saying that lesbianism is prevelant within vampire society, which tbf is usually very true in a lot of vampire media, and the dev saying there won't be any of that content.I think you guys are in the minority, but that's why I'm in favor of games having options, anyway. Edit: (Sticking it here because it's most relevant here) 6 of the 8 reactions on my post disagreed with me, so at least among the people interested in this game, you appear to be in the majority. So maybe I'm just totally wrong, or maybe it's different on other games pages, and I'm not completely crazy? Idk.
Don't tell me you never be in real 3some, without telling me you never be in 3some ))
And, if you gonna end up in MMF 3some, do you gonna help another man? Because it's 3some, you need to help your bro, suck him off a little![]()
An average man takes 3–5 minutes to cum, whereas an average woman takes 12-15, so up to 5x as long. You really think a man who can finish in 3 can please 2 women who each take 15 in a single threesome without them doing things to themselves or each other? I was slightly joking to exaggerate my point... but realistically speaking, even though it's POSSIBLE, it's NOT happening.A man can satisfy two women at the same time. You just need a little imagination. For example, he can use his mouth to bring her to orgasm or prepare her with his fingers until it's her turn to have his cock. They can also talk dirty, he kisses the other woman, they can play a little role-playing game where one of the women tells the MC and the other girl what to do, etc., etc. It all depends on a little imagination. I'm sure there are 1,000 more ways that I'm not mentioning, but they're just small examples.
First, if you shove your cock right in the woman without any prelude, yep she gonna last longer.An average man takes 3–5 minutes to cum, whereas an average woman takes 12-15, so up to 5x as long. You really think a man who can finish in 3 can please 2 women who each take 15 in a single threesome without them doing things to themselves or each other? I was slightly joking to exaggerate my point... but realistically speaking, even though it's POSSIBLE, it's NOT happening.