- Jan 13, 2020
- 17
- 45
Hey. People like what they like and hate what they hate. I can't blame you for being who you are. Have a nice day.let these shit games coming, next step is 1 5-star vote.. i'm so glad we have unlimited ignores...
Hey. People like what they like and hate what they hate. I can't blame you for being who you are. Have a nice day.let these shit games coming, next step is 1 5-star vote.. i'm so glad we have unlimited ignores...
Fair enough, it would be wise to put that in description.Because you can choose to be female, or a futa.
Differences from person to person are not really relevant since we're talking about basic anatomy here. If you place a woman sideways and use an X-ray on her to look at the anatomy of her pelvis area, the vagina will be pointing down and diagonally backwards, not forwards like a man's penis.Apparently you haven't seen enough labias, then. You for sure can see the labias from the front. Then again, not every woman is the same and this picture does not show the vagina at all seeing how it is hidden by the labias.
I didn't draw the picture but I'll make sure to let the artist know (who is female) that she doesn't know female anatomy. I'm sure the criticism will help her become a better artist. Another thing, what makes you think that this picture is supposed to be anatomically correct in the first place? Women don't have gems embedded in their chest, either.Differences from person to person are not really relevant since we're talking about basic anatomy here. If you place a woman sideways and use an X-ray on her to look at the anatomy of her pelvis area, the vagina will be pointing down and diagonally backwards, not forwards like a man's penis.
Labias are obviously placed in relation to the vagina, and not a single woman in existence has the entire labia visible on the front of her pelvis when she is lying flat like that. You will only see the front-most part. This is just an example of artists being anatomically challenged and sexually inexperienced, nothing more.
If you haven't noticed that trend in the art in these games, then either you haven't played many of them or you don't know basics of women's anatomy.
Hey man, from one dev to another, you shouldn't be getting into these petty squabbles the moment you release a game. It looks juvenile and will make people question your professionalism. If you want to be serious about doing this, you need to learn to ignore people.I didn't draw the picture but I'll make sure to let the artist know (who is female) that she doesn't know female anatomy. I'm sure the criticism will help her become a better artist. Another thing, what makes you think that this picture is supposed to be anatomically correct in the first place? Women don't have gems embedded in their chest, either.
You make a good point. I didn't see really see it as an argument. I was engaging my audience. I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt.Hey man, from one dev to another, you shouldn't be getting into these petty squabbles the moment you release a game. It looks juvenile and will make people question your professionalism. If you want to be serious about doing this, you need to learn to ignore people.
Since this seems to be sarcastic, are you suggesting constructive criticism can't help an artist improve their work?I didn't draw the picture but I'll make sure to let the artist know (who is female) that she doesn't know female anatomy. I'm sure the criticism will help her become a better artist.
"Hentai anatomy" probably needs to be filed in the same folder of soi-disants as "porn logic", yeah.And it's not really a personal remark. Take solace in the fact that the frontal vag is a pretty common artistic "choice" when it comes to lewd games, so much so that people often don't seem to notice it. There are games where penetration happens from the front where she's not in missionary position and the players don't seem to notice anything wrong with this lmao. I guess you could argue it's part of an established "artstyle" by now, kinda like gravity defying boobs and so on.
It is super early. Maybe 15 minutes of reading so far. I'm currently working on finishing up Ch. 1.how much content is there so far? playtime wise?
I hadn't really planned on putting it online. I was just going to update the links with the updated file like other devs do. Isn't that what local is?Took one look and see the dl is just an html. I take it this thing is going online for the rest of the content? If so, count me out until things are made local.
I hadn't really planned on putting it online. I was just going to update the links with the updated file like other devs do. Isn't that what local is?
Well, I'm new to this, so please explain why that is bad. It is a game I'm creating on Twine. I do plan on adding images to it as well.So is this text only or do you have media content? If you have images or video and are only providing html, that means you are going with external sources for it. That will get me started on my lecture about why that's bad.
Well, I'm new to this, so please explain why that is bad. It is a game I'm creating on Twine. I do plan on adding images to it as well.
On hiatus for the time being. Ran into some real-life situations.dead?