I like how one guy states a simple opinion that literally affects nothing, and people jump down his throat like he dm'd the dev threatening to seize his bank account if he doesn't add an NTR ending.
Homie, I think the fact that you put "consent" in quotations implies that it's not really consent. What you described is called coercion, consent describes a voluntary agreement. Both people agreed to start the NTS play in this case, so it shouldn't be an issue until one explicitly says to stop. Part of the appeal of NTS can be the anticipation of knowing it will happen, but not knowing exactly when. It's getting excited thinking up scenarios that could be happening at any given time, whether you end up knowing about it or not. Not all NTS play has to follow the same formula, some are strict in their wholesomeness, and some play into the immorality of sharing your girl, it's up to the dev's creativity as long as the couple is still clearly devoted and willing. Just because you play into the kinkiness of the situation doesn't mean everything is gonna go to shit (Especially in a video game where the dev has full control). I trust the dev's NTS vision, so having to treat the player base with kid gloves because they selectively forget that consent and understanding were established a minute ago is always silly.