This is by no means a straw man argument since I addressed only the points you made, the way you made them, and even used your own words. Calling this a straw man argument is like pretending what you wrote isn't what you wrote. I am willing to believe that what you wrote isn't what you meant, but that doesn't make it a straw man argument, that's on you.
Now this is a good example of a straw man argument. You first misrepresent what I wrote when I said that the Mod is the owner of the thread and not the Dev, so it's unlikely that the missing tag was 'intentionally deceptive' as you suggested, then you said it is irrelevant and not a valid point, I explained to you why it is valid and relevant by expanding on what I meant by pointing out that Mods maintain many threads, so they can easily miss some tags in some threads by mistake, not intentionally or due to laziness like you suggested in your 2 posts multiple times. Now you once more repeat the same thing you said the first time ignoring what I said and try to suggest that somehow your misrepresentation makes my point irrelevant... what's irrelevant is the self-serving misrepresentation you are trying to use which has nothing to do with what I said. A classic straw man argument you are trying to pull there.
No one was arguing about what the basis of your initial comment was or if you should or should not point out mistakes... Your posts were accusing of intentionally misleading the users and laziness, I pointed that out, you doubled down and I provided further arguments, that was all. I argued what you posted, not the fact that you posted.
This is the key point that we were arguing... this is why I called your post delusional. I was explaining to you in my second post that in this case the problem is the system, and not the fact that someone was not using the system properly. I am not defending it, I am pointing this out. You keep trying to misrepresent what I write and argue against that... where did I say that I didn't want you posting about missing tags? Where did I defend the 'status quo'? I explained the reason behind it, which you suggested was laziness and deception, and I explained to you that it isn't, there are other causes such as shortage of time, far more game threads than people that maintain them, and human error. Lets not lie about what someone did or said and try to argue against that... try arguing aganist what is actally there.
Please provide at least 1 quote from any one of my posts to you here where I made a personal attack. I ridiculed what you wrote and the arguments you have made but I never said anything about you.
I called your post delusional, I repeatedly pointed out that the arguments you made are based on you confusing your fantasies with reality about how things actually work... but at no point did I make any remarks insulting you, only your arguments and the things you wrote. You on the other hand made a ton of baseless and false claims which I pointed out so I wouldn't call this a debate, more like dispelling baseless accusations/claims made by you.
