Most of us, want to shed another light on the whole AI game genre. With enough care and attention, you can create some visually stunning and coherent images, granted that you can write a decent enough story to go alongside it.
In a sense, we could sacrifice that quality in order to have faster updates, but then we're just like all the others. In an increasingly competitive market, there's so many of these games coming out, but only a few manage to stand out and that's mainly due to the reasons I mentioned above.
I think it must come down to a stylistic preference then - because for me, and I suspect several others here, a lot of ai art kinda blends together.
That's not to diminish the hard work you do, I've but a surface knowledge of how much time goes into reworking ai-generated renders in layers to produce the final in-game images.
But for myself, at the end of the day, it still looks like AI cartoon art. Pleasing to look at? Absolutely! And all the touchups done reduce the feeling of "ugh look at her hands" encountered with more bulk production methods. However, (and again, I get this is all highly subjective) - I feel there's a much smaller gap between "bad ai" and "good ai". Apologies for those I'll use as the 'bad' examples (cept capkitty guy's a jerk) - compare something like the following:
disclaimer- i just grabbed 4 random images from game promos; so I could certainly be cherrypicking or not a fair comparison...still, I think each is decently representative of the source.
Looks decent, though the longer I look at it I see little things like her hand or shirt folds or background errors, perspective errors etc. But I'm guessing most people would look at this and say "shrug, looks like a pretty typical ai game render".
Looks great, multiple characters on screen, and looking at the fine details everything is as it should be, no botched hands, no clipping errors or artifacts, characters have unique expressions not just the same generic "ai girlfriend smile".
Someone definitely worked harder when making this image.
Looks...fine I guess, you can tell what the characters are doing, but posing is pretty wooden, lighting is blasted out, environment and props aren't very interesting, expressions nonexistent.
I don't even need to elaborate or caption here. It's night and day, not even the slightest resemblence.
So in summary, while I do appreciate good-looking AI games, IMO the difference in quality to the layperson's eye is often so slight it doesn't justify the blood and sweat spent elevating those graphics from the baseline. I know that's a sucky message to tell anyone in a creative pursuit, basically saying "forget the complex syncopated solos, stick with 4/4 powerchords for success!" But I sincerely believe most players would prefer (with their wallets) faster production.
I'd welcome hear others opinions, would you take the tradeoff of twice the development time to get the better looking ai art above? Would you accept twice the development time for the better looking daz art?