- Jan 23, 2018
- 11
- 9
These kid of things are due to your device's graphic processing capacity. The game is oddly heavy to runhmm something seems wrong here
No, it's clearly the MC practising his marvellous hiding techniques.These kid of things are due to your device's graphic processing capacity. The game is oddly heavy to run
That just means we are going to get another 20 years of What a Legend!The art is amazing, but I am a little worried with the outlook of the game because of how much work it must be to create all those backgrounds and set pieces, and with at least two more towns to flesh out.
I don't think that's the main cause. I never had issues before update 0.5, but with it I saw some graphics either transition in advance or linger around longer than expected. I believe the new renpy version might be the cause, as it obviously caused other problems for the game's release.These kid of things are due to your device's graphic processing capacity. The game is oddly heavy to run
Yep, people moan about the time taken but I'd rather the time was taken and the dev's make what they want to make. rather than rushing out a lesser thing to stop the bitching
lol Shame more people don't have the same attitude.This is how I feel about the game here. Found it a few weeks ago, binged it, and as much as I want more, can't rush perfection.
He's not the only guy having graphical glitches, as I mentioned I had them too. I don't consider 8 core i7 + GTX 1080 to be a low end config. I do have to admit I used the rollback feature, which might be a contributing factor to reproduce some of these glitches.My GPU is a couple of years old & I have been running games which adapted to the not so new version of Ren'Py for a good while and have never seen any of them display graphical anomalies, like the one in the image.
I have also not experienced any with this game, whatsoever.
I'd reserve judgement, saying it's unlikely to be the main cause, until you see what GPU the guy with the problem is running.
He may well be on 10+ year old equipment. If his GPU does not have enough VRAM then you can see things like that occur with heavier images & animations.
Not quite true. I've heard this expression used in relation to services as well.That's an invalid comparison.
Primarily due to the fact that the expression is directly in relation to producing products/goods.
That really sucks man! Personally, I have always gotten my things fairly packaged and completely undamaged. There are people I know who've had the same problems as you but they're very rare and they've always been able to get a refund.Bad example, the amount of times I've received things badly packaged and boxes damaged in transit is way more than I've received them intact.
Also consider those making it happen behind the scenes that are working in horrible conditions. Are you suggesting the devs work 24/7 just to deliver something to you for free ?
Have no idea where people are getting the notion that game developers should "work 24/7" under "horrible conditions" or "pump out complete triple A games every week for next to no money" from my post.That's a service, not a product. But sure, because you found an online store that doesn't actually make something, developpers have no excuse to pump out complete tripple A games every week for next to no money.
Nop, there won't be NTR, devs have even stated that in big letters in the game's descriptionI know theres no NTR at the moment but will their be an option for it in the future? Holly's story has been set up almost exactly for optional NTR.
The reason why that mantra is often stated is because it's true. Sure, there are exceptions to it, but there's a valid reason that's not applicable to everyone (mainly the initial budget so they can provide it cheap on a large scale). But the reason why you got so much "hate" for it was because the initial post complained it'll never finish with the quality the game has right now, so obviously, anything that tries to counter any reason why the long updates are justified implies they're not valid excuses.I was just providing a reasonable counter-example to the often stated mantra of "Fast, Good, Cheap: Pick One!"
Yes, we all know the old saying - "The exception proves the rule!"The reason why that mantra is often stated is because it's true. Sure, there are exceptions to it, but there's a valid reason that's not applicable to everyone (mainly the initial budget so they can provide it cheap on a large scale).
(1) If you read my earlier post more carefully, I never said, nor implied, that I got any hate. I only said that Amazon is hated - which it is.But the reason why you got so much "hate" for it was because the initial post complained it'll never finish with the quality the game has right now, so obviously, anything that tries to counter any reason why the long updates are justified implies they're not valid excuses.
Hahaha. Fair enough.wow seen a few threads deteriorate, and some strange subjects being raised, but amazon??? come on, you are better then that
Its partially subsidized by USPS, and therefore the users of the mail system absorb these costs through increases in postage. The other carriers, UPS, and FedEx (my least Favorite domestic) do it through negotiations there is also private deliveries, and the drone program which are managed in house.The problem is amazon's 2-day delivery is *not* cheap: It's just set up so the end customer isn't the one who (directly) absorbs the cost.