Ren'Py What a Legend! [v0.7.03] [MagicNuts]
- Thread starter magicnuts
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg adventure anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating creampie exhibitionism fantasy groping group sex handjob harem humor male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game monster girl oral sex paranormal point & click romance sandbox sex toys spanking teasing titfuck transformation vaginal sex voyeurism
- Jul 25, 2018
- 702
- 1,106
Agreed. Good things happen because people have a vision, it's not for nothing that people say a camel is a horse designed by a committee (which, to be fair is a horrible thing to say to the wonderful camel).
- Sep 9, 2018
- 1,478
- 3,146
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Oct 23, 2019
- 18
- 50
Bro, keep huffing that copium. WaL has like 6 girls with 2 scenes each, SS has like 30+ girls with a shit ton having more than 5 scenes AND it has a repeatable pregnancy mechanic. It's like saying Veggietales is gonna be the next Harry Potter lol
- Oct 29, 2019
- 17
- 40
Only just came across this game, and all I can say is thanks to Lana I'm not gonna have any sensation in my cock for a week.
I hope she gets more than what's planned in future, but I can't be greedy. She's already gold.
I hope she gets more than what's planned in future, but I can't be greedy. She's already gold.
- Jan 3, 2022
- 11
- 8
They were saying that in the context of development speed I believe. Of course summertime has more scenes, it has been in development for a lot longer than this game.
- Jun 19, 2017
- 4,176
- 6,145
Ultimately both games are pretty much comparable, simply because they are both drawn by one person and the amount content we get roughly equals to what one person is able to drawn in a given period of time.
WaL! has the great advantage that it was properly planned right from the start, whereas SS started as a coding exercise for its dev and wasn't really supposed to become anything.
WaL! has the great advantage that it was properly planned right from the start, whereas SS started as a coding exercise for its dev and wasn't really supposed to become anything.
- Jan 23, 2018
- 102
- 101
The pregnancy mechanic is SS is completely shit, your baby doesn't even have a face and dissapears after some weeks. The plot and writing of WaL are much better as are the girls/character models. SS has better animation (which sometimes is completely distorted, like roxxy solo sex scene in the bottle game) and better minigames/game mechanics. To be honest the two games are similar the only difference is the size of available content, It's not a difference in quality.
If you expect that WaL is actually gonna have named children or any sort of actual kid content beyond "oh we shipped him/her off to a babysitter" you're in for a ride lol.
No porn game is going to write your kids. Mainly because it would be impossible to write that well.
- Apr 12, 2018
- 10,933
- 7,368
You'd be surprised about that actually... but "the good stuff" is reserved foir games with a limited character pool and one time pregnancy.
Still this is not "the impregnator" or something so I am not expecting much anyway.
- Jun 21, 2017
- 5,703
- 5,694
It's possible to achieve. It could be done by having the option to marry a woman at some point to unlock the pregnancy route and then you can have some quality time with her, some time skips if the devs offer a few stages of pregnancy and another time skip when the baby is there. Basically a larger CG scene that ends in a game over. To prevent people saving during that scene saving should be impossible.
- Jun 19, 2017
- 4,176
- 6,145
To be honest, the whole problem is that it's a lot of additional work, which seems to be an issue with pregnancy content in general. Either you make it quick and it'll seem a bit half-assed or you have to spend a significant amount of development time on it, while there's a chance that only few players will actually really appreciate that effort.
- Jun 21, 2017
- 5,703
- 5,694
You are right about that but you can use that argument on several kinks and fetishes. Not everyone likes anal, some people only like M/M content and will be disappointed if WaL might have that later but only a tiny bit and some people want more or less sex in a game.
You can't please them all but you can do have a solid pregnancy system/route which not many games have. Not all will like it but the kink is stronk nowadays so it's a sink to earn money. The way I described how it could be done will "spare" those who aren't into it (just don't marry someone) and reward those who like it. It will consume time and resources, yes, but so does everything else.
A game who has futanari as the main focus will devour a lot of time just for that. Why should pregnancy not get a huge spotlight if the devs would like to have that in their game?
Anyway... I will enjoy it when it becomes part of the game but I hope the devs will put the same love and effort into it as they have with the existing content.
- Jun 19, 2017
- 4,176
- 6,145
Hm, I think anal and pregnancy are almost the perfect opposites in this case. To add anal you can just add a scene or two with a few lines to almost every character and it'll be fine. That's a very reasonable effort.
For pregnancy on the other hand you need a lot of context/writing, several new CGs/sprites for different stages, art for the child, possibly even new game mechanics, etc. and there's still a chance that quite a few who actually like pregnancy content just aren't into the character that was chosen for it and rather would have liked to see somebody else. It's certainly a fetish that requires effort.
Oh, I totally agree and I'm not agianst that at all. I just want(ed) to add why it's not that clear for many who don't actually care that much. I mean, there's surely large number of devs who don't like every fetish they implement. If somebody is really into it, that's great, but for a dev who looks at fetishes he may wants add, pregnancy isn't the most obvious. But that's just my opinion.
- Jun 17, 2019
- 4,343
- 14,452
Depicting children in a porn game is a big no-no for Steam. If I were a dev, I wouldn't risk it as having a bunch of babies around doesn't really add anything of value to the game
- Jun 21, 2017
- 5,703
- 5,694
You mean in a sexual way, right? I can't imagine Steam going apeshit about games with children if they are just treated like children and not become the fantasy of an abuser.^^'
- Jun 17, 2019
- 4,343
- 14,452
Just having an underage character showing up on screen in an adult game, even in a wholesome, non-sexual context, will put the game at risk of being deplatformed